BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,374
- Reaction score
- 19,167
- Points
- 113
per Helmholdt:
Minnesota was the only Power Five school, and one of just three FBS programs, to extend an offer to Richardson coming out of high school even though he played for a Chicago Mt. Carmel team that won state championships in both his junior and senior seasons. Recruiting networks, like-wise, were less than optimistic for Richardson’s college career. He was ranked no higher than the 56th best defensive tackle prospect in the 2014 class and as low as the 57th best prospect coming out of the state of Illinois that year.
“Honestly, I think it was just the height,” Richardson conceded at Tuesday’s Big Ten Media Day. “If I was 6-3 maybe I would have gotten a couple more stars or a couple more looks.”
As the director of Midwest scouting for Rivals.com, I am one of the culprits. We initially rated Richardson as a two-star prospect, elevating him to a 5.5 Rivals Rating, lowest in the three-star category, only after a productive senior season in which he helped Mt. Carmel to their second straight state title.
While a three-star rating is a Power Five rating, Richardson’s career has played out better than expectations for a prospect rated just above the dividing line between Group of Five and Power Five. Height, or lack thereof, was certainly a major factor in Richardson’s prospect rating. The official Minnesota roster generously lists him at 6-foot even. His Rivals.com prospect profile had him at 5-foot-11, and even that may have been optimistic. The production was certainly there – he had 34 tackles for loss and 17 sacks among 65 total tackles as a senior – and he truthfully was the catalyst of a Mt. Carmel defensive line that also featured four-star Enoch Smith. Ratings are projections, though, and his effectiveness battling taller offensive linemen with longer reaches at the college level was reason for concern.
Rating prospects involves more than film review or in-person evaluations. We talk with others who have coached or scouted these prospects. One who advocated strongly for Richardson, and ultimately proved to have a more accurate handle on the Chicago native’s potential, was Rivals.com’s Illinois High School publisher EdgyTim. His input was a catalyst for Richardson’s bump to three stars following his senior season, though Tim was advocating for an even higher move.
“If you look at him on the hoof and compare him to other defensive tackles in the class it is pretty understandable why he was ranked where he was,” EdgyTim commented. “But he showed me three years of production that was really second-to-none. He went up against top-notch competition that also had size and strength. He never backed down and never had a problem with anyone.”
https://n.rivals.com/news/why-the-recruiting-industry-got-it-wrong-with-steven-richardson
Go Gophers!!
Minnesota was the only Power Five school, and one of just three FBS programs, to extend an offer to Richardson coming out of high school even though he played for a Chicago Mt. Carmel team that won state championships in both his junior and senior seasons. Recruiting networks, like-wise, were less than optimistic for Richardson’s college career. He was ranked no higher than the 56th best defensive tackle prospect in the 2014 class and as low as the 57th best prospect coming out of the state of Illinois that year.
“Honestly, I think it was just the height,” Richardson conceded at Tuesday’s Big Ten Media Day. “If I was 6-3 maybe I would have gotten a couple more stars or a couple more looks.”
As the director of Midwest scouting for Rivals.com, I am one of the culprits. We initially rated Richardson as a two-star prospect, elevating him to a 5.5 Rivals Rating, lowest in the three-star category, only after a productive senior season in which he helped Mt. Carmel to their second straight state title.
While a three-star rating is a Power Five rating, Richardson’s career has played out better than expectations for a prospect rated just above the dividing line between Group of Five and Power Five. Height, or lack thereof, was certainly a major factor in Richardson’s prospect rating. The official Minnesota roster generously lists him at 6-foot even. His Rivals.com prospect profile had him at 5-foot-11, and even that may have been optimistic. The production was certainly there – he had 34 tackles for loss and 17 sacks among 65 total tackles as a senior – and he truthfully was the catalyst of a Mt. Carmel defensive line that also featured four-star Enoch Smith. Ratings are projections, though, and his effectiveness battling taller offensive linemen with longer reaches at the college level was reason for concern.
Rating prospects involves more than film review or in-person evaluations. We talk with others who have coached or scouted these prospects. One who advocated strongly for Richardson, and ultimately proved to have a more accurate handle on the Chicago native’s potential, was Rivals.com’s Illinois High School publisher EdgyTim. His input was a catalyst for Richardson’s bump to three stars following his senior season, though Tim was advocating for an even higher move.
“If you look at him on the hoof and compare him to other defensive tackles in the class it is pretty understandable why he was ranked where he was,” EdgyTim commented. “But he showed me three years of production that was really second-to-none. He went up against top-notch competition that also had size and strength. He never backed down and never had a problem with anyone.”
https://n.rivals.com/news/why-the-recruiting-industry-got-it-wrong-with-steven-richardson
Go Gophers!!
