He said on his show this week that his freshman class has played much better than he expected and added that he thinks they are the best freshman class he has ever recruited. Yikes. I replayed it to make sure i heard it correctly.
If Tubby is taking the long (4 year view), he might be telling the truth.
He said on his show this week that his freshman class has played much better than he expected and added that he thinks they are the best freshman class he has ever recruited. Yikes. I replayed it to make sure i heard it correctly.
Maybe a little(or a lot) but it's hard to argue with the results. I love Chip and the skill set he brings to the team. Mo easily out played our other two big men last game. Austin can shot and is sneaky good around the rim. Maverick is steady and shooting 90% from the line. O2 and E2 get a year to sit and improve their strength for next season which is huge for them and us because we really don't need them this year. Zero off the court problems (knock on wood) equals a very nice freshman class. I'm sure FOT will find a class at Kentucky that would kill this group but I'm lovin them right now.
Agree on the Nolen/Ahanmisi comparison, but disagree on the Hoffarber/Hollins one. There is nothing that suggests to me that Hollins will not be as good as the Hoff. Hollins is more versatile and athletic. This is not a knock on Hoff - he's been a great player for us. But I see no reason why Hollins will not equal or surpass his skills., but I would agree that Ahanmisi and Hollins are never going to be as good as Hoffarber and Nolen.
If Tubby is taking the long (4 year view), he might be telling the truth.
....I wonder if paradigms will switch towards recruiting 5* types (and their parents, advisors, and entourages) with plans for a short pit stop to showcase their talents and with the expectation for offenses to run through them so The League scouts can have highlight tapes of their skills.
LOL - reason #476 to be grateful we have Tubby!is Tubby exaggerating? For his whole career? Probably? His time at MN? Probably not. In any case it doesn't even register on the Brewster BS meter.
is Tubby exaggerating? For his whole career? Probably? His time at MN? Probably not. In any case it doesn't even register on the Brewster BS meter.
Best ever? Hard to believe that he didn't have a better class at Kentucky. I will leave that up to FOT to debate.
However, if he is talking about his recruiting classes just here at MN, perhaps he is correct....hard to tell. Joseph, Sampson and Colton have been pretty solid.
The good part is that every one of these recruiting classes were better than Monson. Plus we have a couple of great great players coming in next year.
I hope we continue to have Tubby for many more years as we continue to reload each year and make some noise in the big ten.
I think it's too early to tell on most of the freshman. Rodney Williams looked great around this time last year, then was not very effective in Big Ten play.
Speaking of too early: Looking at nexty year, when was the last time Minnesota had this many athletes in the backcourt? Chip, Andre, Austin, Joe, and Devoe? 5 deep? Athletic doesn't mean good at basketball and I don't know if any of them can be the PG we need, but they all appear to have Big Ten athleticism (in this case meaning running, jumping, first step quickness).
I agree, and I've seen a few people say this before.I'm not sure I'd call Devoe athletic.
I agree, and I've seen a few people say this before.
He's not quick, doesn't have blow-by speed, doesn't jump very well nor "quickly"...I wouldn't call Joseph "athletic" either.