Moses87 said:No, I was unsure because I thought I missed something last night in the pregame show. ESPN didn't mention anything at all. You would think two professionals like Dykes and Nessler would at least take some interest in updating his status....but nothing!
I'd even accept bi-lateral leg weakness as an excuse right now. The way the team's been playing now, does anyone really care? Maybe he's happy where he's at. Team has been much more aggressive without him. Even Ingram has shown some fight in his limited chances.
MadtownGopher said:Ralph was able to go last night if they needed him, I'd bet he plays Tuesday. With that being said, I'm in the boat that believes we are a better team without him.
I'd even accept bi-lateral leg weakness as an excuse right now. The way the team's been playing now, does anyone really care? Maybe he's happy where he's at. Team has been much more aggressive without him. Even Ingram has shown some fight in his limited chances.
Last night I'd bet Ralph would have put up 20.
I'd definitely rather have Ralph than not. He is a good shooter, makes free throws, and a safety net on inbounds passes. He is better offensively by far than EE. EE shows more hustle, but in nearly all aspects of talent, Ralph is the better player.
Exactly. The offense flows much better than when Ralph is out on the perimeter clogging things up.
Ralph's softness and passiveness rubs off on the rest of the team, his sky hooks are also mementum killers for our offense. Give me Eazy E over Ralph all day long.
Moses87 said:I have been as critical as anybody about his lack of development, but we could definitely have used his 5 fouls and low post presence on both sides of the ball last night.
I hope Tubby finds a way to use him and I hope for Ralph's sake he's able to go out on a more positive note. I like the kid and his old man and wish them nothing but the best.
Pardon my ignorance, but do we know for certain why he's not playing?