You can't paralyze yourself with every possible bad outcome that exists. Yes that's a possibility. My mother in law has emphysema and we have suspended visits to her based on not wanting to infect her. But for the last few years we had already been taking that precaution whenever we were sick, because any cold or virus would be just as likely lethal to her. That doesn't mean that I will accept that with the flip of a switch we have all signed off on never hugging our parents again indefinitely. It's about measuring the risk and taking appropriate action. There will come a point where the risk is small enough I'm not going to obsess about it. In the Section 10 scenario if you went to the game and waited 2 weeks before visiting someone at risk you've gotten outside the reasonable window where you could transfer something you picked up at that game to someone else. Depending on your level of interaction in that 2 weeks with other people, you might decide your in the clear. We've all taken 4 weeks now of isolation, that's two cycles of the generally accepted life of the virus. Those of us on day 1 that were carriers and asymptomatic should now be safe from spreading this by community contact. We've been through 2 life cycles of this bug, we are accepting another life cycle in isolation. All I'm saying is that we should be expecting in May a structured back to work plan based on where we are at.
