Go Gophers Rah
Section 238 Row 21
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,374
- Reaction score
- 195
- Points
- 63
Attached is a table showing how our Offense compares to their Defense, how their Offense compares to our Defense and special teams matchups. If anyone can tell me how to put this in columns, it would be easier to read).
Here are some noteworthy stats:
#8 KU Passing Offense versus #88 Gopher Passing Defense (ouch)
#57 Gophers passing yards versus #113 KU Pass Defense
#118 KU yards per kickoff return versus #12 Gopher Kickoff Defense (of course when you don't kick off very often...)
#25 sacking Gophers versus #92 KU in Sacks Allowed
After going through the stats, I am feeling far better about our chances. Sure Kansas has an awesome passing game, but look at the pass defense rankings of some of their opponents: #117 Mizzou, #116 Louisiana Tech, #115 Iowa State, #109 Texas, #105 K-State, #99 Oklahoma and #91 Texas Tech.
I think that they will have a few more rushing yards than us and will get 100+ more passing yards than us. But I think we will get into their backfield a fair amount and could cause some mistakes on their part. In the end, if we are to win, we will have to play a very good game and win the turnover and special teams battles.
I'm putting th e whole list of stats in a quote box so that ads won't mess it up:
Here are some noteworthy stats:
#8 KU Passing Offense versus #88 Gopher Passing Defense (ouch)
#57 Gophers passing yards versus #113 KU Pass Defense
#118 KU yards per kickoff return versus #12 Gopher Kickoff Defense (of course when you don't kick off very often...)
#25 sacking Gophers versus #92 KU in Sacks Allowed
After going through the stats, I am feeling far better about our chances. Sure Kansas has an awesome passing game, but look at the pass defense rankings of some of their opponents: #117 Mizzou, #116 Louisiana Tech, #115 Iowa State, #109 Texas, #105 K-State, #99 Oklahoma and #91 Texas Tech.
I think that they will have a few more rushing yards than us and will get 100+ more passing yards than us. But I think we will get into their backfield a fair amount and could cause some mistakes on their part. In the end, if we are to win, we will have to play a very good game and win the turnover and special teams battles.
I'm putting th e whole list of stats in a quote box so that ads won't mess it up:
Bold = differential of 60 or more
U of M KU Winner
Minn O vs KU D #91 (322 ypg) #94 (402.2 ypg) U of M
Minn Scoring O vs KU Scoring D #81 (23.4 ppg) #87 (29.5 ppg) U of M
UM Rushing O vs KU rushing D #104 (106 ypg) #33 (126.7 ypg) KU
UM Passing O vs KU Passing D #57 (216 ypg) #113 (276 ypg) U of M
UM Sacks Allowed vs KU Sacks #85 (27) #47 (25) KU
UM RZ Off vs KU RZ Def #18 (89%) #46 (80%) U of M
UM 3rd Down % vs KU 3rd Down Def#90 (35.5%) #81 (41.8%) KU
UM Ints Allowed vs KU Ints #21 (8) #32 (15) U of M
UM TFL allowed vs KU TFL #52 (5.6 ypg) #34 (6.3 ypg) KU
KU O vs Minn D #74 (378 ypg) #23 (431 ypg) KU
KU Scoring O vs Minn Scoring D #49 (23.3 ppg) #27 (32.7 ppg) KU
KU Rushing O vs Minn Rushing D #71 (147 ypg) #80 (129 ypg) U of M
KU Passing O vs Minn Passing D #8 (302 ypg) #88 (232 ypg) KU
KU Sacks Allowed vs Minn Sacks #25 #92 U of M
KU RZ Off vs Minn RZ Def #62 (82%) #36 (85%) KU
KU 3rd Down % vs UM 3rd Down Def #54 (38%) #11 (50%) KU
KU Ints Allowed vs UM Ints #62 (12) #42 (14) U of M
KU TFL allowed vs UM TFL #22 #84 U of M
UM KO returns vs KU KO Def #22 (23.5 ypr) #55 (20.7 ypr) U of M
UM Punt Ret vs KU Punt Def #42 (10.24 ypr) #86 (10.9 ypr) U of M
KU KO returns vs UM KO Def #118 (17.4 ypr) #12 (18.4 ypr) U of M
KU Punt Ret vs UM Punt Def #22 (12 ypr) #57 (8.5 ypr) KU
Net Punting #43 (36.2 ypk) #95 (33 ypk) U of M
Turnover Margin #12 (+12) #46 (+3) U of M