BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,384
- Reaction score
- 19,195
- Points
- 113
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Go Gophers!!
Go Gophers!!
He's not defenseless. He's a runner who puts his head down. The stretches on this site for justification of losses is unreal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stop changing the subject with video evidence. We are a dirty team, and nobody else is.<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Go Gophers!!
So you just assume that if it's called targeting and he has to sit out, that his replacement is in the same exact spot on every play?Who cares? That play had no affect on the game and if anybody else besides the QB is tackled like that we aren't even having this discussion, it would be considered a legit football play (which is good). If anything I'm thankful that they didn't call targeting on Lynn (not that I thought it was targeting).
Don't have to be defenseless if the defender launches and leads with the crown of the helmet. That was textbook targeting. Didn't cost MN the game, so whatever. But was definitely BS.
Don't have to be defenseless if the defender launches and leads with the crown of the helmet. That was textbook targeting. Didn't cost MN the game, so whatever. But was definitely BS.
So you just assume that if it's called targeting and he has to sit out, that his replacement is in the same exact spot on every play?
If the Mitch play today was targeting, then about 50 percent of the running plays involving a RB would be targeting. The officials rarely if ever call targeting when a runner is advancing and helmet to helmet contact happens. Regardless of what the rule books says that is not how the officials call it.
I am tired of reading these misguided calls for targeting. Watch some games, and get back to me when you see the officials call targeting on a hit on a runner. The only one I have ever seen was when the player was on the ground and the defender came up late and "speared" the runner.
I just about threw a chair at the TV when "Bad Mitch" made his inevitable reappearance and threw that awful interception in the end zone.
In my heart I knew better, that a TD was probably needed to have any hope of holding on and 20-10 lead would probably not be enough, but it still destroyed all momentum. I half though/ hoped that our defense could hold up with a 20-10 lead and if the running game could kill some clock. The fact that the defense hung in there for four quarters against what has been a very active and explosive Northwestern last week gave me some hope.
Right before the play I said to the two cats sitting next to me, that we either needed to hand the ball of to Brooks, or let Mitch take one look and if it was not there throw it into the seats. Instead he threw the predictable pic, and the two cats were quickly exiting the living room.
Mitch and Jay Johnson pretty much made anything the defense did or did not do irrelevant.