I'm not calling for anyone's head. I have issue with how vanilla our offense has been, but not the overarching approach (run the ball, shorten the game, control possession, etc.).
And I wasn't too alarmed about Leidner going into the game. He'd thrown what - 76 passes in college? That's equal to maybe three games (typically)? I felt like I'd seen enough to make me think, "he'll get there, he just needs to play".
But I was shocked at how bad we looked on so many levels Saturday:
1. Our veteran offensive line was dominated
2. The difference in speed and skill between their receivers and ours. Everybody knows we are weak/young/raw at WR, but besides that, we're ridiculously slow
3. Leidner was obviously hurting, but he didn't just look like an inexperienced QB, he looked like he'd never played QB - ever. That was embarrassing, and I don't necessarily blame him. He was obviously limited, and I'm not sure if the coaches left him in because he's the supposed "leader" or because they are that afraid of playing Streveler. Either scenario is troubling. Boykin is a very good player, but he is in a completely different stratosphere compared to ML at this point.
For me, and I'm sure a number of other people on here, it wasn't just that we lost the game Saturday, it was the way in which we lost. The score doesn't indicate the disparity in talent that was so obvious to anyone watching.
That said, it could very well be that TCU has a 10+ win team this year, plus they had a bye week, had only played a dump team, were healthy, etc. And thankfully, as I've said several times in other threads, the Big Ten is wide open this year and anything could happen.
It was just really disappointing to see that while I think we have progressed, we're still so much farther away than I thought/hoped.