Gopherhole's Sports Huddle Recap: Tracy Claeys - 12/18/16

DL65

Active member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
16
Points
38
As was mentioned in an earlier post, Sid Hartman fell and broke his right hip on Friday and underwent surgery yesterday. According to Dave Mona, Sid slipped on ice when he left his house for a birthday party. He went to the party, however when he returned home he didn’t feel well and couldn’t ascend the stairs at home. An ambulance was summoned and he was transported to Fairview Hospital. Dave said if people want to send cards or notes of good wishes, they should send them to WCCO radio and they’ll forward them to Sid, daily. Hospital officials said no visitors, as Sid recovers from his injury and surgery.

As a result of his injury and surgery, Mike Max appeared on today’s Sports Huddle with co-host Dave Mona; however he was not present for the Tracy Claeys segment because of television duties.

Questions directed to Tracy Claeys on today’s Sports Huddle focused on player suspensions, EOAA’s 85-page report, the players’ announcement Thursday of their boycott and participation in the Holiday Bowl, and Saturday’s announcement that their boycott had ended.


1) Before any questions were asked by Dave Mona, Tracy Claeys expressed his best wishes to Sid Hartman: “Thoughts and prayers go out to Sid.” He also said Sid is a great supporter of Gopher athletics and an “all-time best Gopher fan.”

2) Dave Mona opened the segment mentioning the boycott, EOAA report and the effects of the week has had on the coaching staff, players and program:

Claeys replied, “Everything needs to go forward.”

He emphasized that no one connected with the football program support or minimize the seriousness of sexual assault: “No way do they (players) support sexual assault . . . due process was the reason (boycott) for the kids.”

He also said the players’ action/purpose was “not overthrow powers” (administration).

3) Dave Mona asked if Claeys announcement of his support of the players had affected his relationships with the school’s/sports administration:

Claeys said, “You pick up the report (EOAA 85-page report) and you know why they (administrators) made the decision.”

He said he had a long meeting with players before they announced their boycott, He said the players’ decision was solely about “due process:” By signing a scholarship you don’t give up your rights . . . this was never about sexual assault.”

4) Dave then asked Claeys if he tried to separate the players involved and not involved in the suspensions/report:

Again, Claeys stressed the importance of due process, which was mentioned throughout the Tracy Claeys segment, “Make sure all the kids (involved) get a fair hearing.”

5) Dave Mona asked if the players knew and understood the potential fall-out if they moved forward with a boycott:

Claeys said that’s why he spent a lot of time with the players before they announced their boycott. He told there would be a group of people who would be against their action. He also said he told the players in the meeting, “There’s a great chance I could lose my job” - because of his support of their action they were about to take.

6) Dave Mona turned his attention to the upcoming Holiday Bowl game, wanting to know about the team’s preparations:

Before he answered Dave’s query, Claeys, once again stressed the seriousness of sexual assault and the effects it has on the victims. He then told Dave that he was personally going to donate $50,000 to those who have been affected by sexual assaults.

He said the Holiday Bowl would be a platform about sexual assault and due process. (IMO, he was referencing the news medias coverage during bowl preparations and on game day; and that discussions were not a bad thing.)

He ended Dave’s question by saying they would be practicing this afternoon and they’ll be competitive in their game with Washington State; and even though they’ve missed a couple scheduled practices they’ll do their best in bowl game preparations.

7) Dave Mona then cited a team – Arkansas coached by Lou Holtz in the1978 Orange Bowl against Number One Oklahoma - that came together in the bowl game in which three players were suspended. Mona said the trio accounted for 78% of the plays. The Razorbacks were 24 point underdogs; however, they upset the Sooners 31-6:

Claeys said he was familiar with the story and the importance of teams coming together when adversity strikes – "the powers of a team."

Claeys then said, “Our kids will be ready to practice.”

8) Dave Mona asked if the issues and circumstance of the past week have brought the team together:

Claeys told Dave that this year’s team is the closet group of players that they’ve had since the coaching staff arrived at Minnesota, which helps explain the players action on Thursday – not that they don’t think sexual assault is a serious matter but “due process” is important, too.


Note: Because Christmas falls on Sunday next week, there will be no Sports Huddle as WCCO will be playing Holiday music all day.



Go Gophers!!
 

Interesting: TC donating 50k to victims of sexual assault. Will that be enough to keep his job? Sounds as tho TC is getting some PR help.
 

Sounds like Claeys did a good job of differentiating the two issues and affirming the need for due process while declaring the evils of sexual assault.
It would be great if the majority of people could recognize the reason the team boycotted.
 

Sounds like Claeys did a good job of differentiating the two issues and affirming the need for due process while declaring the evils of sexual assault.
It would be great if the majority of people could recognize the reason the team boycotted.

It's incredibly unfortunate that in the statement read by the team announcing the boycott the goal was the reinstatement of players versus a call for a fair and impartial hearing for the players involved. It was already going to be a moral conflict over a process conflict, but it galvanized it as a moral one by calling for a blind reinstatement.
 

It's incredibly unfortunate that in the statement read by the team announcing the boycott the goal was the reinstatement of players versus a call for a fair and impartial hearing for the players involved. It was already going to be a moral conflict over a process conflict, but it galvanized it as a moral one by calling for a blind reinstatement.
Very good point.
 


It's incredibly unfortunate that in the statement read by the team announcing the boycott the goal was the reinstatement of players versus a call for a fair and impartial hearing for the players involved. It was already going to be a moral conflict over a process conflict, but it galvanized it as a moral one by calling for a blind reinstatement.

The statement did talk a lot about due process. My guess is the call to reinstate the players was because they didn't feel the investigation was done fairly.

But I know that doesn't fir the narrative of some that the boycott meant they were okay with sexual assault.
 

Thanks DL for doing this and Merry Christmas to you and your family!
 

Good on TC for doing this interview. He could have chosen to be completely bunkered-down. I've actually gained respect for him based on how he's handled this abhorrent situation. He's said more and done more than others regarding this situation "which is bigger than football".
 

It's incredibly unfortunate that in the statement read by the team announcing the boycott the goal was the reinstatement of players versus a call for a fair and impartial hearing for the players involved. It was already going to be a moral conflict over a process conflict, but it galvanized it as a moral one by calling for a blind reinstatement.
You are right. Wording is important and in their emotion the team did not word their complaint very well.
Claeys has added clarification, which I think is important for all of us to understand.
 



It's incredibly unfortunate that in the statement read by the team announcing the boycott the goal was the reinstatement of players versus a call for a fair and impartial hearing for the players involved. It was already going to be a moral conflict over a process conflict, but it galvanized it as a moral one by calling for a blind reinstatement.

I will give the players this: They were willing to learn and change direction based on new information. The change in content and tone between the statements was dramatic. They, like Claeys, seemed to come to an understanding that there were two issues here, the fairness of the process, and the vital importance of addressing sexual assault. I hope that those who were disgusted by the boycott and the first statement can see the player's change of heart as a positive thing, and maybe a step towards common ground.

We need to find a way to deal with the very serious problem of sexual assault on campuses, as detailed in this disturbing Startribune article: http://www.startribune.com/after-au...e-her-rapist-u-student-fought-back/398051931/

Those who think there is systematic bias against the accused might want to consider this quote from that article: "What she didn’t know was that there had been more than 1,000 sex assaults reported since 2010 to the Aurora Center, the school’s rape prevention and victim advocacy department, according to a Star Tribune review of the center’s reports. Yet, according to the Aurora Center’s director, Katie Eichele, the total number of rapists who had been prosecuted was zero."

We also need to have due process for those accused. Rushing to one side or the other, digging in, and slamming our hands over our ears will not solve anything.
 

Thanks DL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




Top Bottom