cheeseburgerphil26
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2026
- Messages
- 285
- Reaction score
- 231
- Points
- 43
I’ll say if Larson is planning on having 80-90% Minnesotans on the roster like he said then that’s not a great start lol. Have to get Schneider.
Agreed 100%. And I’m perfectly fine if we’re not going with that ratio, but if you are you have to get the ones that are projected 1st round picksI’ll say if Larson is planning on having 80-90% Minnesotans on the roster like he said then that’s not a great start lol. Have to get Schneider.
Stings more that it was just down to us and them.Agreed 100%. And I’m perfectly fine if we’re not going with that ratio, but if you are you have to get the ones that are projected 1st round picks
Completely meh consolation prize. UND doesn't take too many cake eaters so sure the Gophers will get him.Have to get Schneider.
Willis will definitely be a priority but I was just talking about the Minnesotans. I wouldn’t use meh to describe the potential for Schneider but yes Fitzhenry was the top one you needed to get.Completely meh consolation prize. UND doesn't take too many cake eaters so sure the Gophers will get him.
If you're gonna lose Fitzhenry, you have to get Willis.
The 2nd tier Minnesota kids are less interesting now with CHL opened up. You have to get the top guys.Willis will definitely be a priority but I was just talking about the Minnesotans. I wouldn’t use meh to describe the potential for Schneider but yes Fitzhenry was the top one you needed to get.
I mean Schneider is still seen as one of the top forwards in the age group for US. Most u17s don’t light it up first year.The 2nd tier Minnesota kids are less interesting now with CHL opened up. You have to get the top guys.
First Minnesota recruiting test: failed