Gimme 5, Day 1: Historical look Rivals five-stars

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
63,049
Reaction score
20,723
Points
113
per Rivals:

Rivals.com takes a historical look this week at its five-star honorees through the years. In this series, Rivals.com ranks the best five-star facts within certain topics each day. Today's topic: The Big Three.

Beginning with the class of 2002, the first year of numerical and star rankings in our Rivals.com database, every recruit has strived to receive this honor, the ultimate in football recruiting rankings. However, over that time only 421 high school recruits have actually accomplished it. Some have thrived while others have disappointed, but overall it has been an interesting ride.

Not surprisingly, three states stand out when it comes to the quantity of five-stars produced from the class of 2002 until the class of 2015. Leading the way is Florida, with 72, followed by California with 53 and Texas with 49. This means that these three states have produced around 41 percent of the five-star recruits. With this many five-stars in each of these three states, it is normal for people to remember the success stories more than the disappointments. However, the reality is that the negatives tend to outnumber the positives.

4 Recent Trends From 2010 to 2014, only eight of the 25, or 32 percent of the top five players have come from Florida, California or Texas. During those years, Indiana, Minnesota, Illinois, Missouri and New Jersey have all had top five recruits.

"I love the diversity, I really do," said Farrell. "I think the recent trend comes with a better ability to scout and see kids from every place. In the early days we relied upon film and one all-star game, but nowadays you can see everyone and almost every top kid goes against other top players at all-star camps or games. It really makes a huge difference for kids from smaller states."

https://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1781933

Go Gophers!!
 

In reality there is no difference between rated the 12th best recruit and the 8th best recruit.
It makes sense they would try to diversify the top 10 to draw more interest from more places to make more money.


Seantrell henderson would not have been a top 10 recruit if you just graded his senior year. But once the services have rated him through the roof they can't come back and say they were wrong about the best player just one year later.
 

In reality there is no difference between rated the 12th best recruit and the 8th best recruit.
It makes sense they would try to diversify the top 10 to draw more interest from more places to make more money.


Seantrell henderson would not have been a top 10 recruit if you just graded his senior year. But once the services have rated him through the roof they can't come back and say they were wrong about the best player just one year later.

Seantrel was #1 on Scout.
 




He's also in the NFL.

If you watched him play he wasn't the best player in the country. He was still very good.

7th round pick says he was very good but clearly didn't live up to being in the top 10
 

Seantrel absolutely did not live up to the rating he was given by the fantasy recruiting sights but so far in the NFL he has been an overachiever. He started in most if not all of the games in his rookie season which earned him a pretty good bonus over what the league minimum is, which is what I believe he signed for. I have no idea how his NFL career will pan out but I would not judge him as a pro until his career is over. If his dad gets out of the way or is pushed out of the way and Seantrel applies himself he still has tremendous upside.
 

If you watched him play he wasn't the best player in the country. He was still very good.

7th round pick says he was very good but clearly didn't live up to being in the top 10

He wasn't picked in the 7th round because of ability.

He was the top recruit in the country because he has the physical tools to be a dominant Tackle, at any level. That's obvious "if you watched him play." Ratings are largely based on perceived upside. You're dealing with 17 year olds. He had huge upside, and It could be argued that he still has the upside of a Pro Bowl caliber Tackle. That's why he was drafted at all, considering his attitude.
 

He wasn't picked in the 7th round because of ability.

He was the top recruit in the country because he has the physical tools to be a dominant Tackle, at any level. That's obvious "if you watched him play." Ratings are largely based on perceived upside. You're dealing with 17 year olds. He had huge upside, and It could be argued that he still has the upside of a Pro Bowl caliber Tackle. That's why he was drafted at all, considering his attitude.

Have you ever met him?
You have no idea what his attitude is.

He didn't finish blocks in high school. He didn't finish blocks in college.


If you never finished blocks at an elite level, were you ever an elite player?


Rivals downgraded him after the allstar game because they thought he was overrated. They only moved him down one or two spots. It is easier for a recruiting service to say he was a bust due to his attitude than to say they did a bad job scouting (because the latter would call into question the reliability of their entire operation)
 



Have you ever met him?
You have no idea what his attitude is.

He didn't finish blocks in high school. He didn't finish blocks in college.


If you never finished blocks at an elite level, were you ever an elite player?


Rivals downgraded him after the allstar game because they thought he was overrated. They only moved him down one or two spots. It is easier for a recruiting service to say he was a bust due to his attitude than to say they did a bad job scouting (because the latter would call into question the reliability of their entire operation)

IMO Henderson is a classic motivated by $$$ player who also battled injury. Henderson started all 16 games at right tackle in his rookie season!!! I would say he is still elite.
 

IMO Henderson is a classic motivated by $$$ player who also battled injury. Henderson started all 16 games at right tackle in his rookie season!!! I would say he is still elite.

Obviously anyone who plays division one football is elite compared to the rest of the general population? Was he the best rookie in the NFL? Not close. Is he an elite NFL player? Not close.

He is still very good. Not elite.
 




Top Bottom