dpodoll68
Elite Poster
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 19,347
- Reaction score
- 1,040
- Points
- 113
I have argued this to much ridicule for football - but especially for basketball there should be more than 5 stars to rate a player. A 3 star rated player in basketball is basically a recruiting service throwing up their arms and saying "we have no idea, but a major conference team signed them so here we go." They may end up being a star or Gilbert. Even the 247 number rankings are ridiculous - if they were equivalent to football, the Gopher basketball team would be a top tier program. All rankings are somewhat predictive, but subjective - but basketball is way more of a farce than football.
There is much more to it than simply a star rating - there is a numerical value assigned to players as well. Are you seriously not aware of this?