A_Slab_of_Bacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 24,611
- Reaction score
- 15,306
- Points
- 113
I feel like we need an overreaction thread for overreactions.
That is an over-reaction.I feel like we need an overreaction thread for overreactions.
Iowa lost to a (Jeff) Brohm and Rondale Moore-less Purdue team. PSU lost to Indiana. Both much āworseā opponents than MI. I stated this in another thread, but this one hurt much more because we donāt get another crack at the jug for 3 more years (unless we meet them in the 9th game). Iād much rather lose some fluke game like Maryland than MI for that reason alone.
2019 we got break but for whatever reason when things don't go well the gophers have this mass of haters show up.Clearly brought out the worst of the worst on the threads last night. Going to be a weird year this year.
Have the Vikings and Gophers play to see which is best of the bad Minnesota football teams. Honestly will be a long season for both teams.Overreaction: "They're as bad as the Vikings!"
I guess I'm missing the thread or mass posts as described. Wondering your definition of mass of haters and #2G worst of the worst...2019 we got break but for whatever reason when things don't go well the gophers have this mass of haters show up.
Considering the 9th game setup....I think it's VERY possible that we see Michigan for a second time this year.
No, 1 plays 1 (championship game), 2 plays 2, 3 plays 3 etc...I thought the Big 10 was going to do everything possible to avoid repeat match ups, unless it was the 2 Division winners.
Should it happen, I was surprised to learn Minnesota/Michigan have played twice before in the same season, back in 1926. The Wolverines won both games, 20-0 on Oct 16 in Ann Arbor and then 7-6 on Nov 20 in Minneapolis. So there is a precedent.
No, 1 plays 1 (championship game), 2 plays 2, 3 plays 3 etc...
No, you're right...they did mention that somewhere. For example, Purdue doesn't play Michigan this year. So let's say MN ends up #2 in the West with Purdue at #3. Michigan ends up #2 in the East with Indiana #3. It's likely the B1G would pair MN - IU and PU - Mich to avoid repeat matchups.I know that is the general idea, but I thought there is some leeway to avoid repeats if possible (except for the Title). Say for instance Northwestern and Nebraska tie for 4th in the West and Maryland finishes 4th in the East. The Terps would play the Huskers to avoid the repeat.
Things change so often, maybe I am way off base or I mixed it up with other conferences.
No, you're right...they did mention that somewhere. For example, Purdue doesn't play Michigan this year. So let's say MN ends up #2 in the West with Purdue at #3. Michigan ends up #2 in the East with Indiana #3. It's likely the B1G would pair MN - IU and PU - Mich to avoid repeat matchups.
No, you're right...they did mention that somewhere. For example, Purdue doesn't play Michigan this year. So let's say MN ends up #2 in the West with Purdue at #3. Michigan ends up #2 in the East with Indiana #3. It's likely the B1G would pair MN - IU and PU - Mich to avoid repeat matchups.
I haven't been able to find any written "rule" for how they will set the match-ups, but I have heard Barry Alvarez (who was on the scheduling committee, I believe) say that they will avoid repeat games. Obviously, 1 v 1 in the Championship Game will happen even if it's a repeat, but after that they will try to give each team a new opponent.Thanks, reassuring I was not making stuff up in my head.
I haven't been able to find any written "rule" for how they will set the match-ups, but I have heard Barry Alvarez (who was on the scheduling committee, I believe) say that they will avoid repeat games. Obviously, 1 v 1 in the Championship Game will happen even if it's a repeat, but after that they will try to give each team a new opponent.
With only two crossover games in the regular schedule, it shouldn't be too hard to avoid repeats, but agree if there's a "perfect storm" where the games line up that way I think they'd prefer a repeat over that.I want to say Barry emphasized try. Hopefully they don't try too hard. I'd hate to see it go full bonkers and like #7 has to play #2 or something dumb like that.
Iowa lost to a (Jeff) Brohm and Rondale Moore-less Purdue team. PSU lost to Indiana. Both much āworseā opponents than MI. I stated this in another thread, but this one hurt much more because we donāt get another crack at the jug for 3 more years (unless we meet them in the 9th game). Iād much rather lose some fluke game like Maryland than MI for that reason alone.
I'll take that bet.My money is on Rutgers to win the conference!
I'll take that bet.
It would be right in line with things I didn't expect!I was joshing, but how great would it be for 2020!