Fleck: This is still a developmental program. Year nine has nothing to do with it. Every year is its own entity. We lost nine NFL players last year…

Donate To GopherHole


I like Fleck and that he has raised the floor but come on. He needs to stop this. Year 9 matters. The fact that they missed on almost all of their portal addictions matter. The fact that they don't have 5 division 1 offensive lineman on the team in year 9 matter. Injuries happen to everybody. Step up and take responsibility and say this needs to get better. This is not womens basketball where a 500 record and people want to build a statue for you.
 

Gopher Mac said:
I like Fleck and that he has raised the floor but come on. He needs to stop this. Year 9 matters. The fact that they missed on almost all of their portal addictions matter. The fact that they don't have 5 division 1 offensive lineman on the team in year 9 matter. Injuries happen to everybody. Step up and take responsibility and say this needs to get better. This is not womens basketball where a 500 record and people want to build a statue for you.
Click to expand...
In the current landscape though the expectations you mentioned are attainable or missable in year 3 as they are in year 9. Increased tenure doesn’t magically cure anything.
 

I think he was referring to the coaches on his staff more than anything else.
 


It's college football... there's no keeping players for 10 years.

It's always changing.

Based on talent level ... I'd argue that last years team actually underachieved and this years has to some extent overachieved.
 
Last edited:

People tend to perceive program development as if it were in a video game, where year to year progression is just that, a constant climb without any regression until five star program status is achieved. The reality is that it does ebb and flow. That being said, I do expect our defensive schemes to make fucking sense if we aren't able to field an Alabama-esque defense in year nine
 





Counting guys who didn't get drafted or make it out of training camp as "NFL players" is unreasonable.

Even if you count it as 9, Ohio State and Oregon both had more than that drafted last year and that didn't stop them from blowing us out.

Sounds like he's saying this is the best we should expect out of him - if 9 years isn't enough, 19 won't be either.
 

GoGophersUMN said:
Counting guys who didn't get drafted or make it out of training camp as "NFL players" is unreasonable.

Even if you count it as 9, Ohio State and Oregon both had more than that drafted last year and that didn't stop them from blowing us out.

Sounds like he's saying this is the best we should expect out of him - if 9 years isn't enough, 19 won't be either.
Click to expand...
He wants culture sustainability. But in year 9 does not have a team with players developed to plug into the system and play that is on him. Plus if he makes mistakes he can go out and get players from the portal to plug holes. If he does not have players ready to play again that is on him. I don't care if they are freshman or seniors or how young they are.Get the players that can play.
 

Wait a minute...year 9?
What happened to years zero??
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom