Firing Brewster

[MBAGuy]

So Illinois did beat Iowa?

Good Christ....

<a href="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php" title="Smileys"><img src="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-violent072.gif" alt="Smileys" border="0" /></a>

 

[Schnoodler]

Maybe he remembered wrong? It wasn't prepared data. It wasn't his release. And this is where you and your types lose any crediblity you think you gain by using crap like this as a part of your arguments. The grasping at anything you can find no matter how absurd to try and spin your web of hatred towards this man becomes laughable. It's apparent you care little for the truth, only for building a case against Brewster. For any little bit that you think this reflects what type of a man Brewster is because he couldn't remember something like this from over twenty years ago when put on the spot, makes you and the whole lot look like complete tools because you think it has any merit, that it means anything. The absurdity of the depths that is gone to try to find anything that might reflect poorly on Brewster makes you all look like a bunch of whiners, and media hacks.

 

[holereader]

yep - coaching thoses tight ends at Denver and San Diego

really has made the difference - how far back does his record go? - to his high school days? At least we don"t hear him soundng off about Mack Brown, Mike Shannahan, Marty Schottenheimer - Bottom line is I think he is probably staying at least another year so we'll have to saddle up. One other thing though is this BS about he hasn't had a chance to let his recruits show what they got. Sorry but my view is you coach the team you got - He's only had three years??? Heck my opinion is that he had three months to get this team better (who cares about three years) and we could not get a play in on 4th and one (amongst other indications of a poorly coached team) - Coach the team you got and make them better - I just did not see that happening - but wait til next year I guess - maybe they catch lightning in a bottle

 

[steffyboy]

This is getting retarded. I like this board for the value of information some bring especially on the recruiting front. Thanks in advance. It is fun to speculate but this topic has gone off in a million tangents. I generally don't like to post what I know or learn from insiders because most would call it pure speculation and I've heard form good sources on Brew and Maturi. From what I gather it is pretty simple. A lot of the high-profile boosters and U admins (Including Maturi) would like him gone, but they have to tread lightly. They will not just fire him. He will only be replaced if they get a solid alternative. For that reason Brew will probably be here at least another year. It will be interesting to see what he does with his recruits. Personally I think Brew is in over head as a top coach and should be doing what he's good at which is recruiting for the larger programs. I hope I'm wrong, but the guy needs some quality wins or at least must compete against the better teams. Next year's tough schedule will give him plenty of chances. I love the fact that we play USC. That's something we would never have the opportunity to do the past 20 years.

 

[Schnoodler]

You coach the team you've got to the ability they're capable of. The seventh or eigth best talent is likely to be coached to the seventh or eigth best outcomes. This is the highest level of college football, you don't achieve much beyond your talent level. It's just the way it is. The other coaches are very good as well, they're not going to be out coached in any dramatic fashion. You can do that at lower levels, not at this level. you can get luckly though. a couple of games go your way, an easier schedule, and things can happen. But typically at this level, your results reflect your talent level.

 

[holereader]

you may be right but you put them in a situation to perform

take for example the first and goal in the 4th quarter at Iowa - three plays run out of the shot gun? why? in my mind poor coaching decisions did not put the team in a position to perform> What about the first and goal agains Illinios and the first and goal agains wisconsin - all yielding no points - each time assanine plays being called - receivers running poor routes - false starts not being corrected- leading the conference in personal fouls - agree with you on the talent but a good coach shows improvement - Gotta run the wife gave me a hall pass to go watch the hoops game at the bar with some buddies - he is staying so lets see what he can do next year

 

[hudson14]

Maybe he remembered wrong? It wasn't prepared data. It wasn't his release. And this is where you and your types lose any crediblity you think you gain by using crap like this as a part of your arguments. The grasping at anything you can find no matter how absurd to try and spin your web of hatred towards this man becomes laughable. It's apparent you care little for the truth, only for building a case against Brewster. For any little bit that you think this reflects what type of a man Brewster is because he couldn't remember something like this from over twenty years ago when put on the spot, makes you and the whole lot look like complete tools because you think it has any merit, that it means anything. The absurdity of the depths that is gone to try to find anything that might reflect poorly on Brewster makes you all look like a bunch of whiners, and media hacks.

Are you really serious? "Remembering wrong" is what everybody says when they don't tell the truth. He needs prepared data to remember if a fine team he played for won or lost a game?
That's a stretch, but we'll see how it plays out. Do you care anything about the truth?

 

[Schnoodler]

Are you really this big a tool? Do you really think Brewster was lying about the win? Really? You don't think he knows that a bunch of people aren't hanging on every word he says looking for something to hang him with? Do you really think it was such an important thing to lie about, that we would risk being caught in the lie? Tell me you're not this foolish to believe such a rediculous thing.

There is nothing material about it, there is no benefit to Brewster whether he won that game or not, whether we believed he won that game or not. Absolutely nothing to be gained by Brewster to lie. And yet, somehow, the conclusion you buffoons come to is that Brewster is a liar. It's impossible that he remembered wrong, he had to be lying, even though he benefited not one iota by lying, he's a lying scoundrel in your eyes. Unreal. Oh, and welcome to my ignore list. Your opinion has no value as you've just proven, you can only make this site worse.

 

[MBAGuy]

Awesome, Schnoods.

I'll give you the idiotic highlights of his responses. I'll ask him if he can remember the result of every high school game he ever played in. I sure as hell couldn't remember mine. If I ventured to take a guess and was wrong, I'd get to be a filthy liar too.

I love our fans.