btowngopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 8,246
- Reaction score
- 4,578
- Points
- 113
According to scout.com, would be nice to see thios kid accept.
If he comes to the U this is an excellent pick up. I've got a friend that scouted him for a Big 12 school and he thinks Engel should walk on for the U. He said that Engel has the skills to start in the Big 10, possibly as early as his sophomore year, when he gets college level coaching.
We have 30+ seniors with scholarships on the roster this year and we can only bring in 28 scholarship players in the 2010 class so his chances of getting one by 2010 look fairly good.
I guess it's not the most exciting news, but what else is there to post about?
good point. I guess really anything that introduces a topic about Minnesota Recruits is good enough.
I've often been curious about this kid. He's been talked about a while, I have expected him to blow up and catch some decent offers. It would be cool if he walked on.
Related. Can anyone confirm this. Rengel the kid from Sartell, is he the same kid that did so well in the state track meet last spring? If he is, that's pretty damn good for a FB don't you think?
I am curious which Big 12 school was scouting him because I didn't see any listed on rivals with him.
I looked it up. Remember this is for a FB and not a WR/DB
Nick Rengel
Class AA 4th in the 100 at 11.37
4th in the 200 at 22.84
I'm not sure why Rivals doesn't show everybody that has shown interest in Engel but he has been offered preferred walk on status by Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Nebraska.
Are you friends with some of the coaches at Nebraska then?
so grunkiejr what did he have to say about cosgrove as a coach/recruiter?
I looked it up. Remember this is for a FB and not a WR/DB
Nick Rengel
Class AA 4th in the 100 at 11.37
4th in the 200 at 22.84
Funny, I just posted something about this in the "Perspective on Cosgrove" thread. He didn't like Callahan and thought he was incredibly overrated as an offensive mind. You wouldn't believe the rants that I heard from him while he was working under them. His biggest criticism of Callahan was that his playbook was a collection of plays rather than true offensive philosophy. Therefore, the playbook was incredibly hard for college players to grasp and there was no logic in the playcalling.
Despite Cosgrove's reputation with Nebraska fans he wasn't negative toward him at all. He pointed out that the defense was the strongest unit on the team first few years Callahan was at Nebraska. He said that they did have one really bad year and didn't elaborate. However, he went on to say that Pellini is a defensive genius because of the results he is getting out of a defense that lacks talent. The Nebraska teams were rated high on recruiting the past few years but he said there were a couple guys that they were high on that turned in to total busts and Cosgrove had to work with that his last year in Nebraska. I think they are starting 2-3 walk ons that have developed better than 3 or 4 star guys that they brought in.
Cosgrove was liked by a lot of the players there but he never instilled that family type atmosphere and that hard edge to the defense that Pelini has.
What do you mean by "family type atmosphere" and "hard edge" and how do you know Pelini has it while Cosgrove never did?
The players also talk about how they feel Pelini and his staff generally care for each player as a person (i.e. family atmosphere) versus it was more of just a business under the old staff.
I don't mean to knock Rengel or anyone from Minnesota, but it is amazing how much slower our track athletes are compared to other states. For comparison, Rengel's time would have put him with the 60th-fastest time in Florida. Florida's state champion ran a 10.40. In Texas, Rengel would have tied for third among GIRLS!!! He would not be in the top 110 times listed in the state of Texas for boys. Their state champion for boys ran a 10.32...110th-fastest time in Texas last year was 11.34.
A little off-topic, but I found an old ESPN the Mag the other day and it happened to be the "Next" edition from Adrian Peterson's freshman year at OU. I read in there that Peterson ran a 10.3 100m as a senior in high school. That's phenomenal.
Could you please provide a quote where a player talks about how it was more just about business under Cosgrove? If true, it might significantly change my opinion on the Cosgrove hire.
I don't mean to knock Rengel or anyone from Minnesota, but it is amazing how much slower our track athletes are compared to other states. For comparison, Rengel's time would have put him with the 60th-fastest time in Florida. Florida's state champion ran a 10.40. In Texas, Rengel would have tied for third among GIRLS!!! He would not be in the top 110 times listed in the state of Texas for boys. Their state champion for boys ran a 10.32...110th-fastest time in Texas last year was 11.34.
A little off-topic, but I found an old ESPN the Mag the other day and it happened to be the "Next" edition from Adrian Peterson's freshman year at OU. I read in there that Peterson ran a 10.3 100m as a senior in high school. That's phenomenal.
Good point but, how many of the girls and other guys ran his time or better weighing 225+?
I agree with you. I'm not sure if my HS was different than others but all of the good football players were either playing baseball or just lifting in the spring rather than running in track. The population of the state obviously has some impact on the numbers but there has to be something else going on there because it is such a drastic difference. I'm curious if they have separate classes for track too like they do for every other sport. It doesn't seem necessary but given the MSHSL's propensity to allow everyone to participate in the state tournament it wouldn't surprise me.