I know the football program is in a low spot right now, so it's justified to go into every Saturday for the rest of this season not expecting to win unfortunately, but that's not really what I'm getting at, as this doesn't only apply to the football team.
I just read a thread suggesting that Marcus Jones might be out for the rest of the season, which would be too bad as I personally really like him. The poster then decided to take a shot at him for one garbage excessive celebration call against Nebraska last weekend. (When I was watching this game, the announcers seemed to disagree with the call and almost sounded like they felt bad for the kid). Do other fanbases take shots at their players for things like this?
After our exciting game against USC, losing by only 2 points on the road to a ranked opponent, starting out the season with genuine optimism and hope that maybe we could go to a bowl game in Coach Kill's first season, someone pointed out that we easily could have lost by 40+ points. Ok, so what? We didn't lose by 40+, so what's the point in saying that we could have? Do other fanbases actually COMPLAIN when things go better than expected?
On the basketball board, some people still try to downplay the importance of Al Nolen to last year's team, insisting that we still would have sucked even if he were playing for the full season, that somehow having a senior and a great defender as the floor general wouldn't have helped maintain the leads we had and lost late in games last season. Do other fanbases insist that their team would have sucked even if things had gone right?
Do other fanbases have sports writers that rip on them and the teams they support?
Do other fanbases search for negatives in even the greatest of victories?
Ok, my rant is done. I realize this is probably just a vocal minority who have this attitude of how things always could have been and should have been worse and seem almost disappointed when things are going well, but since such negativity is not uncommon here, it just led me to wonder if perhaps some Wisconsin fans chalk up 2005 as a Minnesota victory because they "shouldn't have won?" Or maybe if, up until this year, when a writer is evaluating the coach of the Chicago Bears, he or she doesn't take wins over Detroit into account because the Lions always stink and wins over the Lions don't count because they are a given? Maybe some people think that the USA's win over the USSR in the Olympics was just a fluke, and so it doesn't really count, because the USSR could have beaten them by a lot. If by some miracle we beat Wisconsin this year in football, and it's the program's greatest, sweetest win in the last 10 years, will someone point out that we should have gotten killed instead of celebrating the victory? Unfortunately we will probably never know. It just seems that for a football team coming off a bad season, albeit with a good ending, and likely in the midst of an even worse season, and a basketball team that was likely about to have its best season of the last 10 years until Minnesota bad luck reared its ugly head yet again, some "fans" really like to downplay what little we do achieve, and attack players who sometimes don't really deserve it.
TL;DR Do other fanbases have the same level of self-deprecation that we have?
I just read a thread suggesting that Marcus Jones might be out for the rest of the season, which would be too bad as I personally really like him. The poster then decided to take a shot at him for one garbage excessive celebration call against Nebraska last weekend. (When I was watching this game, the announcers seemed to disagree with the call and almost sounded like they felt bad for the kid). Do other fanbases take shots at their players for things like this?
After our exciting game against USC, losing by only 2 points on the road to a ranked opponent, starting out the season with genuine optimism and hope that maybe we could go to a bowl game in Coach Kill's first season, someone pointed out that we easily could have lost by 40+ points. Ok, so what? We didn't lose by 40+, so what's the point in saying that we could have? Do other fanbases actually COMPLAIN when things go better than expected?
On the basketball board, some people still try to downplay the importance of Al Nolen to last year's team, insisting that we still would have sucked even if he were playing for the full season, that somehow having a senior and a great defender as the floor general wouldn't have helped maintain the leads we had and lost late in games last season. Do other fanbases insist that their team would have sucked even if things had gone right?
Do other fanbases have sports writers that rip on them and the teams they support?
Do other fanbases search for negatives in even the greatest of victories?
Ok, my rant is done. I realize this is probably just a vocal minority who have this attitude of how things always could have been and should have been worse and seem almost disappointed when things are going well, but since such negativity is not uncommon here, it just led me to wonder if perhaps some Wisconsin fans chalk up 2005 as a Minnesota victory because they "shouldn't have won?" Or maybe if, up until this year, when a writer is evaluating the coach of the Chicago Bears, he or she doesn't take wins over Detroit into account because the Lions always stink and wins over the Lions don't count because they are a given? Maybe some people think that the USA's win over the USSR in the Olympics was just a fluke, and so it doesn't really count, because the USSR could have beaten them by a lot. If by some miracle we beat Wisconsin this year in football, and it's the program's greatest, sweetest win in the last 10 years, will someone point out that we should have gotten killed instead of celebrating the victory? Unfortunately we will probably never know. It just seems that for a football team coming off a bad season, albeit with a good ending, and likely in the midst of an even worse season, and a basketball team that was likely about to have its best season of the last 10 years until Minnesota bad luck reared its ugly head yet again, some "fans" really like to downplay what little we do achieve, and attack players who sometimes don't really deserve it.
TL;DR Do other fanbases have the same level of self-deprecation that we have?