gopherncostarica
Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2008
- Messages
- 253
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
Based off todays first half, along with what we have seen so far this year, do you think it is very detrimental to WR recruits looking at the U?
Based off todays first half, along with what we have seen so far this year, do you think it is very detrimental to WR recruits looking at the U?
If my son was a stud receiver, I would definitely discourage him from going to the U under these circumstances-and that really hurts to say.
Absolutely.
On the other hand, RB's and O-line probably love it.
It can be different. Immediate playing time is a possibility. Depends on how you look at it. You'll be manned up one on one all day. Some guys salivate at that
Will your stud play on Sunday?
Immediate playing time...as a full-time blocker.
I mean it could be worse, like running the triple option or something like that.
He is 11- He thinks he is a stud, but has a ways to go!
Didn't top us from landing two stud top 100 WRs this year.
If they're studs, why are they not playing? Clearly we need the help.
Do you guys really think we have no other receivers on the team that have "true receiver hands" and can go up and get a ball? Think again. And I'm not talking the freshman WR's.
Kill is loyal to his coaches and to players to a fault. You think there is no one better than freuchte or someone that has better hands the D. Jones and Wolitarsky?? Sometimes coaches promise things to players to get them to come to the school. Like "you will play your first year". Even though they may not be the best at their position and of course the coach has to play them to prove a point since they recruited them so hard.
Maybe the coaches don't recognize the talent (i.e. D Cobb was third string until last year).
How was the passing game at NIU during Kill's tenure?
So your argument is that our current WRs are playing for unknown reasons and they could be replaced with success, but the coaches refuse?