In the Iowa game last year, we split our De's out wider to prevent Iowa's stretch play, and perhaps more importantly their patented play action off of said stretch play. The result was totally taking that off the table for Iowa, but getting gashed up the gut (252ish for Coker).
Do we employ a similar tactic tomorrow to attempt to keep Robinson in the pocket, and if he runs make sure it's up the middle (where he hopefully gets hit)? Is Robinson getting to the second level on the edge worse than up the middle?
My two cents would be to put getting direct pressure on him on the back burner in exchange for keeping him in the pocket. I would much rather him beat us with his arm than his legs. It is my observation that he is far better improvising against pressure and making things happen than standing back there and flinging it. Rush 4 with wide end splits, 1-2 spies and let their WR's beat our 5-6 DB's. Oh yeah, and stop the run on 1st and 2nd downs or this doesn't matter.
Do we employ a similar tactic tomorrow to attempt to keep Robinson in the pocket, and if he runs make sure it's up the middle (where he hopefully gets hit)? Is Robinson getting to the second level on the edge worse than up the middle?
My two cents would be to put getting direct pressure on him on the back burner in exchange for keeping him in the pocket. I would much rather him beat us with his arm than his legs. It is my observation that he is far better improvising against pressure and making things happen than standing back there and flinging it. Rush 4 with wide end splits, 1-2 spies and let their WR's beat our 5-6 DB's. Oh yeah, and stop the run on 1st and 2nd downs or this doesn't matter.