Coyle Must Go

Donate To GopherHole
Dano564

Dano564

Fleck Superfan
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
10,214
Reaction score
3,016
Points
113
The way he's handling this is pathetic, but the little bit he has said publicly has already been lies.

We're paying his salary with public money to have him lie on who is making the decision.


Sorry for creating another thread, but he's not controlling this situation well at all. He's floating whichever way the wind is blowing at the moment clinging on for his next paycheck.

He is not owning this situation in any way.
 


Face The Facts said:
The way he's handling this is pathetic, but the little bit he has said publicly has already been lies.

We're paying his salary with public money to have him lie on who is making the decision.


Sorry for creating another thread, but he's not controlling this situation well at all. He's floating whichever way the wind is blowing at the moment clinging on for his next paycheck.

He is not owning this situation in any way.
Click to expand...

Correct. Explain the public $$$ thing to dpdoll. The dolly.
 

The reason AD's get paid big money is to proactively deal with these issues.

These conversations with the team should have happened SEVERAL TIMES over the last couple months letting them know that a result in the end COULD BE expulsion, etc., as a on-going reminder.

Also, at that time, it would have been good to also remind the team that "By the way, you play for us, and something that's also in the code of conduct is you don't call out the President and the AD publicly and threaten to boycott, etc.

This all should have been discussed, managed, etc., as this went forward, not after it goes public.


If any of this was happening in the background, the AD should have mentioned when the players names were released as being suspended, that "We have talked with the team, and they understand" or "We talked with the team, and they are upset and angry, and are thinking of not playing in our program into the future as a result".

At least that way, he would have been controlling the situation.
What he has now is the mess he deserves which should be cause for termination in a few weeks.
 

BarnBurner said:
Correct. Explain the public $$$ thing to dpdoll. The dolly.
Click to expand...

dpdoll has enough to worry about regarding all the misspellings of Khailer pervasive on this message board. Please don't bother him with petty issues.
 


Face The Facts said:
The way he's handling this is pathetic, but the little bit he has said publicly has already been lies.

We're paying his salary with public money to have him lie on who is making the decision.


Sorry for creating another thread, but he's not controlling this situation well at all. He's floating whichever way the wind is blowing at the moment clinging on for his next paycheck.

He is not owning this situation in any way.
Click to expand...

Ad salary isn't paid by public dollars. The Athletics department is self funding with btn money, ticket sales, etc


U has many revenue streams
 

salzie said:
Ad salary isn't paid by public dollars. The Athletics department is self funding with btn money, ticket sales, etc


U has many revenue streams
Click to expand...

It's still the U.
I'm not disagreeing they have several streams, but to think that public money isn't part of the reason they have jobs, your obviously not going to comprehend much more of this conversation.
 

Face The Facts said:
The way he's handling this is pathetic, but the little bit he has said publicly has already been lies.

We're paying his salary with public money to have him lie on who is making the decision.


Sorry for creating another thread, but he's not controlling this situation well at all. He's floating whichever way the wind is blowing at the moment clinging on for his next paycheck.

He is not owning this situation in any way.
Click to expand...

You should have created a poll. Nice to see what the crowd thinks so those who wish to remain anonymous can add their two cents.
 

Face The Facts said:
It's still the U.
I'm not disagreeing they have several streams, but to think that public money isn't part of the reason they have jobs, your obviously not going to comprehend much more of this conversation.
Click to expand...

In your eyes maybe, but U doesn't just have one pot of money

They track their different sources and certain funds have restrictions

You are correct that without the u and public funding there would be no athletic department, but public money doesn't go to athletics
 




salzie said:
In your eyes maybe, but U doesn't just have one pot of money

They track their different sources and certain funds have restrictions

You are correct that without the u and public funding there would be no athletic department, but public money doesn't go to athletics
Click to expand...

Noted. Agree.
 

Pretty telling to me that the entire football team, including the coaches, hates him. Not exactly a great start...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

I don't get why so many people are coming down on the U, why are the players supporting these 10 who obviously participated in an immoral event. Who the f0ck stands in line to f*ck a passed out chick while others watch. If that is not against student policy and holding students to higher standard, WTF...rip up my degree from that institution...bravo to the U, IMO, shut down football for this year.
 



Face The Facts said:
It's still the U.
I'm not disagreeing they have several streams, but to think that public money isn't part of the reason they have jobs, your obviously not going to comprehend much more of this conversation.
Click to expand...

Edit: no need to escalate on message board
 

the.chucker said:
I don't get why so many people are coming down on the U, why are the players supporting these 10 who obviously participated in an immoral event. Who the f0ck stands in line to f*ck a passed out chick while others watch. If that is not against student policy and holding students to higher standard, WTF...rip up my degree from that institution...bravo to the U, IMO, shut down football for this year.
Click to expand...
Immoral by whose standards? She wasn't passed out- video shows her enjoying the events.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk
 

the.chucker said:
I don't get why so many people are coming down on the U, why are the players supporting these 10 who obviously participated in an immoral event. Who the f0ck stands in line to f*ck a passed out chick while others watch. If that is not against student policy and holding students to higher standard, WTF...rip up my degree from that institution...bravo to the U, IMO, shut down football for this year.
Click to expand...

Your narrative is so fabricated I can hardly believe your keyboard allowed you to type it.
 

the.chucker said:
I don't get why so many people are coming down on the U, why are the players supporting these 10 who obviously participated in an immoral event. Who the f0ck stands in line to f*ck a passed out chick while others watch. If that is not against student policy and holding students to higher standard, WTF...rip up my degree from that institution...bravo to the U, IMO, shut down football for this year.
Click to expand...

code of ethics, that is the phrase that I could not think of at the time of the post, their actions cannot be in w/I the guidelines of the code of ethics for the students
 

the.chucker said:
I don't get why so many people are coming down on the U, why are the players supporting these 10 who obviously participated in an immoral event. Who the f0ck stands in line to f*ck a passed out chick while others watch. If that is not against student policy and holding students to higher standard, WTF...rip up my degree from that institution...bravo to the U, IMO, shut down football for this year.
Click to expand...

Where have you been all day, Chucker. A couple of other posters and I could have used some help from voice of reason like yours.
 

I'm not defending any of the 10 players until I know more, but it sounds like all 10 might not be that guilty of breaking a code of conduct. I think that's the argument.
In fact, they all might not have based on what people's interpretation of the code of conduct is, which I'm not here to defend.

What I'm calling out is how chicken-sh!t Coyle has been on that and how he's hiding behind "privacy" crap. Well, you named the players. Nice job with the privacy.

But furthermore, he should have been having conversations with the team which could have been done weekly.

"Guys, I want to remind you of the code of conduct"

"Guys, if you mess up, the EOEEIOU Board is the board who will review your case as they will be with a couple players who I won't name"

"Guys, the OEUEIA board is not kind in the past to men who screw up, so don't put yourselves in bad situations"

"guys, in the next week or two we should hear their thoughts on the matter. When it happens, if you have any questions, I'll try to talk as detailed as I can about it, but let's keep things in house. "

"Guys, I have to announce the following players will be suspended. I want to understand any questions you might have and let me understand how you may have felt this was unfair. I can't change their minds. It's outside my realm, but let me hear you out so we can avoid more situations like this in the future"

"Guys, I understand you want to make a statement publicly, but the EOEOOAOA board is going to be all over each and every one of you should you speak publicly to boycott, etc. Realize you may be jeopardizing your scholarship by crossing the code of conduct through your actions".


It's like Coyle's been hiding this hole time and wants people to believe Maturi is still AD.
 

the.chucker said:
code of ethics, that is the phrase that I could not think of at the time of the post, their actions cannot be in w/I the guidelines of the code of ethics for the students
Click to expand...

The code of conduct in the student handbook is a f'n joke. To think that you have to have written permission to have consensual sex is about as misguided as it gets. The problem that happens is that it can be completely consensual, but afterward have regrets about it. That is just a bad decision, not sexual assault or harassment. The same manner as making a losing wager in Vegas.

I'm just glad that I never attended the U in these times, because I would have been on a yearly suspension continually, because I was in the area of something happening. I'm glad that my son, who was a scholarship collegiate athlete, never attended the U, and am very thankful that my daughter, who did attend the U, was smart enough to make her own good decisions.

I'm hopeful that the players continue to stand together and try to cause some change for what has taken place.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom