No way man. The Buffalo was easily driven to the brink of extinction. Gophers are much harder to eliminate. Just ask Carl Spackler.
Very true. Gophers are very dogged and persistent little beasties. They are born prey, which forces them to be wily and very, very quick if they want to survive. Buffaloes on the other hand are large, lumbering behemoths, not terribly bright and pretty darn easy to kill.
In my opinion the whole Colorado-Minnesota thing is entirely subjective and a matter of personal opinion. If you like mountains and Alpine skiing, then probably Colorado is the place. Or if you love tons of lakes and some world-class fishing, then maybe Minnesota is the place. If 'lifestyle' is a criteria, then both places in my opinion offer a very good quality of life. It just depends on what you like.
I don't think it would come down to an issue of money, because Bruinink's and Maturi have both indicated they're willing to pony up in order to get the right guy, and they continue to indicate that, so I'm assuming they're being straight-up and honest about that. It sounds like they're willing to pay a guy enough to where he would be within the top 15 of all college coaches in pay, which is very fair rate and should be a real draw to almost anyone. I'm not sure what Colorado is willing to pay or whether they'd be able to meet or top what we are allegedly prepared to offer the right guy, but either way it shouldn't matter. They're not going to significantly outspend us, and that's pretty much all that matters.
And as far as Big Ten-Pac Ten, again I think that's just a matter of personal preference as to which conference it might be better to coach in. Personally I prefer the Big 10 and see it as being a much more prestigious conference, but that's just me and there are plenty of other people who would say the same thing about the Pac 10.