Good analysis TBNL....
I've seen Wipson play a couple times and I definitely think he is a Big 10 caliber LB. In style of play, he reminded me of Clay Mathews (i'm not comparing him to Clay Mathews in ability, I am comparing him in style). His tape makes him look like more of a traditional type LB, but in the two games that I saw him play, he really seemed to cause a lot of havoc near the line of scrimmage. More than being a pass rushing LB (which he is not), he reminded me of Mathews in just how often you saw him running around the ball. He's a really good HS LB, the best HS LB I've seen in some time in MN (right there with Cottrell).
Keep in mind that I missed a lot of LB prospects (Maxx Williams in HS, Westerhaus, I'm sure that I am missing someone), but Wipson REALLY stands out when you watch Wayzata play. I think in real life, he is even more impressive than his film demonstrates. Whatever you want to call Nick Rallis in HS (LB or S), I prefer Wipson to him as a player. I liked Wipson quite a bit more than Drake Michaelson (EP OLB who got a few BCS offers.
In another thread a few months ago, I posted about how I really wanted Wipson and Cottrell and if I had to pick, it would be Cottrell. I still stand by that comment, but it is more because I see Cottrell as an obvious Big 10 MLB. He has a much larger frame than Wipson. But I am pumped about about getting this kid as well.
So, in my novice opinion, Wipson is a good get.