BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,740
- Reaction score
- 20,088
- Points
- 113
per Chip:
The NCAA took a necessary step in tweaking the targeting rule starting this season. Targeting penalties called in the second half of a game can be appealed to the national coordinator of officials for review. If the call is overturned, the player does not have to sit out the first half of the next game. I have never liked the ejection portion of the targeting penalty because it is too punitive in most cases. Too often we see hits ruled as targeting that clearly are not malicious or are borderline. The potential to appeal at least will lighten the punishment.
www.startribune.com
Go Gophers!!
The NCAA took a necessary step in tweaking the targeting rule starting this season. Targeting penalties called in the second half of a game can be appealed to the national coordinator of officials for review. If the call is overturned, the player does not have to sit out the first half of the next game. I have never liked the ejection portion of the targeting penalty because it is too punitive in most cases. Too often we see hits ruled as targeting that clearly are not malicious or are borderline. The potential to appeal at least will lighten the punishment.

15 thoughts on the college football season from Chip Scoggins
It starts with a predictable top five. From there, keeping track of teams, conferences and players will be anything but.
Go Gophers!!