Bowl Game

ncgo4

Active member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
7
Points
38
Someone in a previous post said that, Brewster is quoted...as saying -- "Good coaching is making the system fit the player, not the player fit the system"

I think he and the OC believe this. I expect many of us will only partially recognize our offensive scheme come late December. It will look much more "Spreadish" or is it "Spreadly" and Weber and the receivers will function much more effectively in it.

Our defensive will do just fine, thank you.
 

I am looking forward to see it, actually. I sure hope our offense finds itself again - I would be really happy to see Weber have a good game and laser a few touchdowns to Green and Gray. It will also be nice to see the seniors one last time, too!!

I wasn't too pumped for the game last year vs. Kansas, but I think this one could be a lot of fun.
 


This is almost the exact same message we were hearing this time last year (offense being majorly tweeked for the bowl game and beyond). I am confident that we'll see better results this time around.
 

Be it spread or pro set or wildcat or single wing

If you cannot block the front 7 you have nothing. All the talent in the world at running back, all the talent at QB and all the talent at wide recieved goes down the drain in less than 3 seconds. Stuffed up the middle, off tackle, or a loss sprinting to the sidelines. Coach Davis has got to get the O line in gear. We cannot drive anyone off the ball, are not quick enough to trap, and our zone blocking has too many holes. Part of it is talent in the offensive line, part is technique, the rest in lack of strength and leverage. Alford couln't hit me if I was standing right in front of him, and Wills is helpless in pass protection. Either coachem up, or lets get someone else in there.

Coaching comes in two basic styles, recruit players to a system. Or evaluate your players and design what the do best. We seem to do neither. We have changed the offense, every week. And cannot seem to understand why we cannot move the ball.

And given Coach Fisch's penchant to scheme in favor being disciplined, leads to too many three and outs and an inablity to control the clock. If we win it is a heroic play by the defense.

If Coach Brewster pulls this off during the Bowl Game practices, and the offense comes out crisp, disciplined, and able to block the front 7 then I say give him the extension after the game.

But that's a big IF
 


It seems our line was improving. The pass protection improved the last third of the year while the run blocking the last. I did see a little push late. I think there's a decent chance we look competent at the bowl.

The thing to remember is that we crumbled against better defenses but did quite well against average to poor defenses (sodak excluded). For some reason whatever negative we have gets magnified against a better defense. This won't be the case against ISU.

Interestingly enough the same phenomena exists with the Cyclones. It could be a very interesting game.
 

If you cannot block the front 7 you have nothing. All the talent in the world at running back, all the talent at QB and all the talent at wide recieved goes down the drain in less than 3 seconds. Stuffed up the middle, off tackle, or a loss sprinting to the sidelines. Coach Davis has got to get the O line in gear. We cannot drive anyone off the ball, are not quick enough to trap, and our zone blocking has too many holes. Part of it is talent in the offensive line, part is technique, the rest in lack of strength and leverage. Alford couln't hit me if I was standing right in front of him, and Wills is helpless in pass protection. Either coachem up, or lets get someone else in there.

Coaching comes in two basic styles, recruit players to a system. Or evaluate your players and design what the do best. We seem to do neither. We have changed the offense, every week. And cannot seem to understand why we cannot move the ball.

And given Coach Fisch's penchant to scheme in favor being disciplined, leads to too many three and outs and an inablity to control the clock. If we win it is a heroic play by the defense.

If Coach Brewster pulls this off during the Bowl Game practices, and the offense comes out crisp, disciplined, and able to block the front 7 then I say give him the extension after the game.

But that's a big IF

Love your approach here, obviously you're a guy who gets it, AKA football is won in the trenches.
I've seen 2 games this year that we actually ran the ball well in, NW and Purdue.
It just seemed like we had a really solid running gameplan in place for NW, and we actually had a physical edge against Purdue.
Why we scrapped the gameplan against NW is beyond me, we mixed in well timed tosses to Whaley, with Gray in the wildcat, as well as classic off tackle, dive, and play action.
That should have been our base offense all year, and the fancy tricks and misdirection could have been built off that gameplan. Stommes in motion playing TE was brillliant, and the dive action tosses to Whaley could have been made extremely effective when Hoese got going late in the year. As for going forward, ISU gives up avg of 170 on the ground, if we can't get 150, we didn't do our jobs up front.
I also expect some young guys to contribute next year, we'll see how ready Olson and Michel are. I hate throwing freshmen linemen into the lineup, but they might just be better than Alford or Bunders. I was not impressed with Wynn last year,and a back injury can be career ending but maybe he contributes at C/G. I'd actually like to see Wills at guard, let him lean into interior tackles, and eliminate his perimeter pass blocking.
Maybe a lineup of Michel-Wills-Wynn-Carufel-Olson?
Any way you cut it, it all starts up front. Tim Davis needs to make a highlight tape of all the missed blocks and light some fires under the big men.
 

I also expect some young guys to contribute next year, we'll see how ready Olson and Michel are. I hate throwing freshmen linemen into the lineup, but they might just be better than Alford or Bunders. I was not impressed with Wynn last year,and a back injury can be career ending but maybe he contributes at C/G. I'd actually like to see Wills at guard, let him lean into interior tackles, and eliminate his perimeter pass blocking.
Maybe a lineup of Michel-Wills-Wynn-Carufel-Olson?
Any way you cut it, it all starts up front. Tim Davis needs to make a highlight tape of all the missed blocks and light some fires under the big men.

I seriously doubt Wills will ever be a guard for us. His pass protection got MUCH better as the season progressed and shouldn't be a problem at all once he drops some more weight. I do, expect, Olson to crack the lineup at the left guard position though. Alford and Carufel will stay put barring a certain recruit coming...
 

I seriously doubt Wills will ever be a guard for us. His pass protection got MUCH better as the season progressed and shouldn't be a problem at all once he drops some more weight. I do, expect, Olson to crack the lineup at the left guard position though. Alford and Carufel will stay put barring a certain recruit coming...

Agreed, Wills improved as the season went on, but he could be a dominant run blocking guard.
I don't see it happening, but it's fun to speculate.
Olson to me looks a bit light still, but if he can get himself a bit bigger and still move, Bunders may be looking at some competition, Michel is big ten body ready and led the freshmen in the fall weight room tests. He might be a candidate to compete with Alford. It sure would be nice if we had a solid and unquestionable position on the Oline, right now Carufel is as close to that as it comes and he's had his troublesome moments this year too.
There are way too many guys in contention for positions going on 2 years now.
Alford, Burris,Orton, Bunders, Davis, Wynn, Carufel, Wills, Olson, Michel all have a shot to start, but we need 5 of them to step into a position and bulldog it away from any competition.
 



Someone in a previous post said that, Brewster is quoted...as saying -- "Good coaching is making the system fit the player, not the player fit the system"

I think he and the OC believe this. I expect many of us will only partially recognize our offensive scheme come late December. It will look much more "Spreadish" or is it "Spreadly" and Weber and the receivers will function much more effectively in it.

Our defensive will do just fine, thank you.

If he said that (I haven't had the chance to read much in the past few weeks) that would be a sign perhaps he's starting to figure it out. For three years Brewster has done the exact opposite (e.g. spread offense with two quality WRs, not using a very good pass catching tight end at all in the offense in Jack Simmons, bringing Weber up under center all of last year when he clearly was not comfortable, etc) of adapting the system to the players.

If he's serious, then there may be hope for him yet. I hope this isn't another "pound the rock" statement and after 12 games of not being spreadish or Spreadly, that it doesn't screw up the offense further.
 


I don't think the comment about matching the system to the player tanscends schemes. I think it's more about tweaking the scheme to enhance the qualities of the athletes playing in it.
 




Top Bottom