It seems like every year the Big 10 gets a bad rap leading into the tourney, yet we consistently out perform other conferences. Similar come bowl season in football. We haven't won the national championship, but advance well in tourney each ear as a conference. I remember a couple posters pointing out last year how the Big Ten had played above it's seed. I didn't do that much analysis, just simply copied someone else's work through wikipedia. Just wish some of the talking heads that do the ripping would point this out as we go on. The ACC and Big East really have done poorly this year.
Conference # of Bids Record Win*&^!#% R32 S16 E8 F4 CG
Big East 8 6–6 .500 4 2 – – –
Big 12 7 7–5 .583 5 2 – – –
ACC 6 5–5 .500 4 1 – – –
Big Ten 5 7–2 .778 4 3 – – –
Mtn West 4 2–4 .333 2 – – – –
SEC 4 4–2 .667 2 2 – – –
Atlantic 10 3 2–2 .500 1 1 – – –
C–USA 2 0–2 .000 – – – – –
Pac-10 2 3–1 .750 2 1 – – –
WAC 2 0–2 .000 – – – – –
WCC 2 3–1 .750 2 1 – – –
Colonial 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
Horizon 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
Ivy 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
MAC 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
MVC 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
Ohio Valley 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
SWAC 1 1–1** .500 – – – – –
One and done teams* 13 0–13 .000 – – – – –
Conference # of Bids Record Win*&^!#% R32 S16 E8 F4 CG
Big East 8 6–6 .500 4 2 – – –
Big 12 7 7–5 .583 5 2 – – –
ACC 6 5–5 .500 4 1 – – –
Big Ten 5 7–2 .778 4 3 – – –
Mtn West 4 2–4 .333 2 – – – –
SEC 4 4–2 .667 2 2 – – –
Atlantic 10 3 2–2 .500 1 1 – – –
C–USA 2 0–2 .000 – – – – –
Pac-10 2 3–1 .750 2 1 – – –
WAC 2 0–2 .000 – – – – –
WCC 2 3–1 .750 2 1 – – –
Colonial 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
Horizon 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
Ivy 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
MAC 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
MVC 1 2–0 1.000 1 1 – – –
Ohio Valley 1 1–1 .500 1 – – – –
SWAC 1 1–1** .500 – – – – –
One and done teams* 13 0–13 .000 – – – – –