Big Ten QBR

upnorthkid

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
9,800
Reaction score
5,152
Points
113
found this interesting since several people have been critical of Nelson's play thus far. currently he ranks at 7th in the Big Ten and 45th in the nation with a QBR of 74.3. mainly due to his running, but still shows he's getting the job done. 50 is considered average.

http://espn.go.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/5
 

found this interesting since several people have been critical of Nelson's play thus far. currently he ranks at 7th in the Big Ten and 45th in the nation with a QBR of 74.3. mainly due to his running, but still shows he's getting the job done. 50 is considered average.

http://espn.go.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/5

Thanks for posting, personally I hate rankings like this because they use stats that casual fans have no possible way of understanding.

From the Glossary in the link:
PASS EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added on plays with pass attempts.
RUN EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added through rushes.
SACK EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added (lost) on sacks.
PEN EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added on penalties.
TOTAL EPA: Total clutch-weighted expected points added.
ACT PLAYS: Action Plays
RAW QBR: Raw Total Quarterback Rating, which values quarterback on all play types on a 0-100 scale.

Even after reading the glossary I couldn't tell you what most of those stats mean. What the heck is clutch-weighted?
 

Even after reading the glossary I couldn't tell you what most of those stats mean. What the heck is clutch-weighted?

I think I remember hearing that it's weighted heavier towards end-of-game stats. Could be wrong though.
 

I think I remember hearing that it's weighted heavier towards end-of-game stats. Could be wrong though.

And it probably matters if the game is close or not. So Nelson running for a touchdown with 2 minutes left in the game to tie the game will be more impactful than if he runs for a touchdown with 2 minutes left in a blowout.
 







Top Bottom