Big Ten Leaders Slip behind WAC & Big East Conferences

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
62,234
Reaction score
18,875
Points
113
per this story from David Shama:

Big Ten Leaders Slip behind WAC & Big East Conferences

Think the Big Ten isn’t having a difficult time in football? The BCS standings have Boise State and Cincinnati, Western Athletic Conference and Big East Conference schools, ranked ahead of Iowa, the top rated Big Ten team.

The first six schools in the standings are: Florida, Alabama, Texas, Boise State, Cincinnati and Iowa. A WAC school ahead of everybody from the Big Ten? Woody Hayes and Bo Schembechler must be fuming in their graves.

Opinion by some who follow college football is that the following conferences are better than the Big Ten: Southeastern, Pac-10, Big 12 and Big East. The SEC is in a class by itself with Florida and Alabama both in the league’s East Division. LSU at No. 9 and South Carolina at No. 23 give the 12 member league four teams in the BCS top 25 rankings.

The Big Ten has four teams also, with No. 13 Penn State, No. 19 Ohio State and No. 21 Wisconsin joining Iowa in the rankings. But based on this season and past performance the Big Ten isn’t impressive. Watching conference teams leads an observer to see fewer extraordinary players and sometimes less team speed on defense than the elite teams in other parts of the country.

Ohio State, the conference’s poster program for success, couldn’t win signature games against Southern California this season and last. The Buckeyes were one of six Big Ten schools to lose bowl games after last season. Iowa was the only winner. And in the last three years the Big Ten has lost all six of its BCS bowl games.

Forty or more years ago it was a good argument as to whether the Big Ten or SEC played the better football. In that era Big Ten teams played black athletes when many other schools didn’t. In the 1950s, 1960s and early 1970s the Big Ten was more active than any other conference in its recruiting and playing of African-Americans. Other conferences were segregated or much more restrictive about opportunities. That edge is long gone.

The Big Ten has been in decline since the 1970s when for the first time it started losing Rose Bowl games with surprising frequency, coming up short in nine of 10 games. More recently Ohio State, for example, has lost three of its last four bowl games, including two games for the national championship.

This season the Big Ten may deserve better than to be ranked behind four other conferences. It’s questionable that the Big East is superior, that’s for sure. And those who are anti-Big Ten shouldn’t go too far in their excitement over conferences like the WAC, Big East and Mountain West (TCU is No. 8 in the BCS standings). Teams like Boise State and TCU play schedules that aren’t all that challenging. Boise’s weak schedule will keep the Broncos from a place in the national championship game.

But give a lot of other schools and conferences across the country credit for improvement and achievement. College football’s limitation on the number of scholarships that schools can provide has created more parity across conferences and the country. The marquee schools can’t hoard players like they once did.

More and better athletes in the south, southwest and west are stocking team rosters with greater talent than in the past. Schools with geographic proximity to that talent often have an advantage in recruiting. There’s an edge some places, too, in academic admissions regarding who gets into one school versus another.

Coaching makes a difference and few would argue that the Big Ten is a league of great coaches. Certainly Kirk Ferentz at Iowa deserves the label. Based on longevity and reputation, Penn State’s Joe Paterno does, too. Ohio State’s Jim Tressel, who has won one national championship and lost in two other title games, is a good coach. Michigan’s Rich Rodriquez must prove he can have the same success in Ann Arbor that he created coaching West Virginia.

The commitment of Big Ten schools to producing winners may not be as all consuming as it once was. At places like Florida and Alabama they have no problem justifying a 24-7, 365 day commitment to football.

In college football, as in life, you get what you ask for. Looks like the Big Ten needs to ask for more.

http://www.shamasportsheadliners.com/

Go Gophers!!
 

The first six schools in the standings are: Florida, Alabama, Texas, Boise State, Cincinnati and Iowa. A WAC school ahead of everybody from the Big Ten? Woody Hayes and Bo Schembechler must be fuming in their graves.

I don't see the Pac-10 or the ACC in that list, they must be behind the highest-rated team in the Big Ten. But how can that be, surely in that case, the article wouldn't be about the Big Ten, but about the Pac-10 or the ACC. Unless this is just a smack piece, but no, that would never happen. :D Woody and Bo were a long, long time ago, college football has changed. Schools like Boise and Utah are playing on a much higher level than they used to. Now that I think about it, I remember BYU winning the National Championship, beating Michigan in the 1984 Holiday Bowl.
 

I think the ACC and PAC 10 look worse than the Big Ten. Big Ten and Big East have had brutal weather this year for games. It's been cold and wet.
 

If Cincy beats Louisville and Iowa beats MSU this weekend I bet Iowa bumps Cincy in the BCS standings. It's that close.

As others have mentioned, the Pac10 and ACC have no teams on that list either.

Also, Alabama is not in the SEC East Division.
 

What articles like this ignore is that the current BCS standing do not reflect the current situation in college sports. The BCS poll is designed to do ONE THING and only one thing: determine which two teams play in the Championship. And if Iowa orTexas goes unbeaten Cincy and Boise State have absolutely no shot. And that's exactly how it should be.

Iowa is building it's case slowly. But if BSU and Iowa are both unbeaten at the end of the regular season Iowa's resume will be twice as impressive. BSU has the opportunity to play 5 non-conference opponents and, once again, they chose to supplement their insanely weak conference schedule with several cupcakes. If they wanted any shot at the BCS Championship they should have passed on the FCS and MAC opponents. If they are unbeaten, the choice to play these games will have directly resulted in leaving them out of the title game.
 


Now that Sagarin's ranking is based on this year's results only, it can be used as good measuring stick. Sagarin has the Pac 10 and SEC the 2 best conferences top to bottom, and the ACC, Big East, Big 12 and Big 10 neck and neck for the second tier of teams. All other conferences when rated top to bottom, fall behind.

Link: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc09.htm
 

If they top teams of the WAC and the MWC were to form a new conference, it would be a conference that could stake a claim as a BCS conference. There are a total of 6 BCS teams with Sagain ratings of 100+. Conference USA has 6 all by itself. The MAC has 7 100+ teams. The MWC has 4 100+ teams. The Sun Belt has 7 100+ teams. The WAC has 3 100+ teams.
 

If they top teams of the WAC and the MWC were to form a new conference, it would be a conference that could stake a claim as a BCS conference. There are a total of 6 BCS teams with Sagain ratings of 100+. Conference USA has 6 all by itself. The MAC has 7 100+ teams. The MWC has 4 100+ teams. The Sun Belt has 7 100+ teams. The WAC has 3 100+ teams.

They know better than that. Look what happened to Florida State and Clemson when the ACC decided to add Miami, Boston College and Virginia Tech. We haven't heard from FSU since. ACC football was exposed as the fraud that it always was.
 




Top Bottom