Audit Organizer Says Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots MISSING In Arizona, Boxes Full of Blank Ballots

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,827
Reaction score
5,334
Points
113
Not following. In old bob’s scenario he would hold zero power. Why on earth would these groups help him forcefully take over the Country? We are firmly planted in bat sh!t crazy land here.
I’m saying his grip on those institutions was never really iron. No reason to expect different in a second term.
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
31,266
Reaction score
8,101
Points
113
I’m saying his grip on those institutions was never really iron. No reason to expect different in a second term.
If anything, they'd (and the country) would be more prepared for what an awful shitshow it would be.

Legit would need to keep the nuclear football out of his hands.
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
23,262
Reaction score
7,014
Points
113
I’m saying his grip on those institutions was never really iron. No reason to expect different in a second term.
OK. So we agree that old bob's sceanrio of those institutions helping him forcefully take over the Country is.... well.... let's just say not very likely.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,827
Reaction score
5,334
Points
113
OK. So we agree that old bob's sceanrio of those institutions helping him forcefully take over the Country is.... well.... let's just say not very likely.
That would be correct. He doesn't really seem to inspire loyalty.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
59,685
Reaction score
15,324
Points
113
Can you remind me again why the military, FBI, and DOJ are going to help him forcefully take over the Country?
He won't need them next time. All necessary states just need to claim "fraud", throw out their results and send Trump electors.
 


Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
23,262
Reaction score
7,014
Points
113
He won't need them next time. All necessary states just need to claim "fraud", throw out their results and send Trump electors.
This has to do with water and voting before noon, right?
 

OldBob53

Banned
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
321
Points
83
Not following. In old bob’s scenario he would hold zero power. Why on earth would these groups help him forcefully take over the Country? We are firmly planted in bat sh!t crazy land here.
I would hold zero power of course but perhaps you're saying Trump would hold zero power? In other words if he lost the election again by vote count and had his people in place as election officials and lieutenant govenors , and tens of millions of rabid supporters, mostly armed, supporting him, he would have no power to overturn an election he lost?
 

OldBob53

Banned
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
321
Points
83
I would hold zero power of course but perhaps you're saying Trump would hold zero power? In other words if he lost the election again by vote count and had his people in place as election officials and lieutenant govenors , and tens of millions of rabid supporters, mostly armed, supporting him, he would have no power to overturn an election he lost?
The election officials and electoral college would simply ignore the vote count because the "machines were rigged again", and on the next January 6th go to Washington and report Trump won their respective states. All superficially nice and official.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
59,685
Reaction score
15,324
Points
113
This has to do with water and voting before noon, right?
You're determined to keep your head in the sand, ignore the big picture and pretend what the GQP is doing is all just innocent. They're all means to the same end. They hope to win the election "legitimately" by stopping enough of the wrong people from voting. If that doesn't work, they have the right people in place to oversee the counting/certification. It's not that complicated.
 



OldBob53

Banned
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
321
Points
83
Then to spell this out a little further once Trump is illegitimately voted in via the electoral college January 6th, despite losing the actual popular and electoral counts, he becomes President of the U. S. and starts putting his people in place in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Defense Department who can then reorder the officer corps as Trump can directly: General Milley you're fired etc.

Would some in the Military resign and lead a counter insurgency? Trumps done away with democracy at this point. Some might think thats worth fighting for. And we'd need them as leaders.

It would get damn ugly, hard to imagine given modern weaponry.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
45,297
Reaction score
6,266
Points
113
Then to spell this out a little further once Trump is illegitimately voted in via the electoral college January 6th, despite losing the actual popular and electoral counts, he becomes President of the U. S. and starts putting his people in place in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Defense Department who can then reorder the officer corps as Trump can directly: General Milley you're fired etc.

Would some in the Military resign and lead a counter insurgency? Trumps done away with democracy at this point. Some might think thats worth fighting for. And we'd need them as leaders.

It would get damn ugly, hard to imagine given modern weaponry.
What the heck are you talking about? What was requested on J6 was more time to verify certain states. You are a victim of fake news.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
59,685
Reaction score
15,324
Points
113
What the heck are you talking about? What was requested on J6 was more time to verify certain states. You are a victim of fake news.
All 50 states had certified long before 1/6. Why do you lie?
 





USAF

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
4,314
Reaction score
4,473
Points
113
What the heck are you talking about? What was requested on J6 was more time to verify certain states. You are a victim of fake news.
JHFC I don't know if you are this stupid, and actually believe this, or this dishonest and contemptuous of democracy.

Either way, it's really bad for my nation.
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
23,262
Reaction score
7,014
Points
113
I would hold zero power of course but perhaps you're saying Trump would hold zero power? In other words if he lost the election again by vote count and had his people in place as election officials and lieutenant govenors , and tens of millions of rabid supporters, mostly armed, supporting him, he would have no power to overturn an election he lost?
The election officials and electoral college would simply ignore the vote count because the "machines were rigged again", and on the next January 6th go to Washington and report Trump won their respective states. All superficially nice and official.
Then to spell this out a little further once Trump is illegitimately voted in via the electoral college January 6th, despite losing the actual popular and electoral counts, he becomes President of the U. S. and starts putting his people in place in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Defense Department who can then reorder the officer corps as Trump can directly: General Milley you're fired etc.

Would some in the Military resign and lead a counter insurgency? Trumps done away with democracy at this point. Some might think thats worth fighting for. And we'd need them as leaders.

It would get damn ugly, hard to imagine given modern weaponry.
Wow Bob. Just Wow.
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
23,262
Reaction score
7,014
Points
113
You're determined to keep your head in the sand, ignore the big picture and pretend what the GQP is doing is all just innocent. They're all means to the same end. They hope to win the election "legitimately" by stopping enough of the wrong people from voting. If that doesn't work, they have the right people in place to oversee the counting/certification. It's not that complicated.
Stop watching CNN. For the love of God.
- And you talk about Beegs and CRG having wacko conspiracies. Do you honestly worry about this happening? You honestly think Trump will be President in 2024 whether or not he wins the vote?
 


howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
59,685
Reaction score
15,324
Points
113
Stop watching CNN. For the love of God.
- And you talk about Beegs and CRG having wacko conspiracies. Do you honestly worry about this happening? You honestly think Trump will be President in 2024 whether or not he wins the vote?
It has nothing to do with CNN. Just stop.

What % chance of it happening does it have to be to become a worry? 10%? 30%? He's very likely to run again. Biden's fairly likely to run again. Biden won by narrow margins in 3-4 states. It's not a huge stretch at all that we could have a repeat of the 2020 election in 2024. And GQP voter suppression could make it even closer if it doesn't put him over the top.

And to think the R-led legislatures in GA, AZ, etc. would never throw the results out and declare Trump the winner of their electoral votes even if he lost is extremely naive.
 
Last edited:


Section2

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
50,776
Reaction score
4,665
Points
113
It has nothing to do with CNN. Just stop.

What % chance of it happening does it have to be to become a worry? 10%? 30%? He's very likely to run again. Biden's fairly likely to run again. Biden won by narrow margins in 3-4 states. It's not a huge stretch at all that we could have a repeat of the 2020 election in 2024. And GQP voter suppression could make it even closer if it doesn't put him over the top.

And to think the R-led legislatures in GA, AZ, etc. would never throw the results out and declare Trump the winner of their electoral votes even if he lost is extremely naive.
Does the Supreme Court weigh in with disputed states? What do you think that vote would be? Very few Republicans would support what you suggest. This is as far fetched as it gets. Again, the only way this happens is if there is proof of some kind of voter fraud, and ruled on by scotus.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
59,685
Reaction score
15,324
Points
113
Does the Supreme Court weigh in with disputed states? What do you think that vote would be? Very few Republicans would support what you suggest. This is as far fetched as it gets. Again, the only way this happens is if there is proof of some kind of voter fraud, and ruled on by scotus.
"Very few". You wish. How would the SCOTUS rule? I don't know and neither do you. But we do know it's a 6-3 conservative court and they are reluctant to involve themselves in election matters if they don't have to. State legislatures have the right to do it. They very well might let them.
 

Section2

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
50,776
Reaction score
4,665
Points
113
"Very few". You wish. How would the SCOTUS rule? I don't know and neither do you. But we do know it's a 6-3 conservative court and they are reluctant to involve themselves in election matters if they don't have to. State legislatures have the right to do it. They very well might let them.
Conservative court yes, do you even know what that means? John Roberts wouldn’t even overturn the clearly unconstitutional ACA. You think he’s voting to install trump despite no evidence he won?
Trump has a few huge fans in congress. How many senators would support this? It’s less than 10 and that’s generous.
You don t really believe this. This is just letting yourself get ginned up by the MSM and to feel like a hero. This is as looney as pizza gate for reference.
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
23,262
Reaction score
7,014
Points
113
And to think the R-led legislatures in GA, AZ, etc. would never throw the results out and declare Trump the winner of their electoral votes even if he lost is extremely naive.
First, let's hope for the sake of the Country that neither of them run in 2024. In fact, let's pray for that.

Next, what is extremely naive is to think that they would be allowed to do this and that there would be nothing the Supreme Court or anyone else could (or would?) do about it and so Trump would just take over as President. Naive is a nice way to put it. Lucky for you I am a nice guy.
 

stocker08

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
27,321
Reaction score
8,551
Points
113
First, let's hope for the sake of the Country that neither of them run in 2024. In fact, let's pray for that.

Next, what is extremely naive is to think that they would be allowed to do this and that there would be nothing the Supreme Court or anyone else could (or would?) do about it and so Trump would just take over as President. Naive is a nice way to put it. Lucky for you I am a nice guy.

Yeah well.....it's been just about a year now.....and not only is the dopey stolen election claim still going strong.....the fraudit still hasn't even wrapped up. Repub politicians have been censured and punished for speaking out against the stolen election claim. Right wing legislatures are passing bills under the guise that the election was stolen and fraud is running rampant.

It's foolish to say it isn't possible considering the previous year of hysteria. Unfortunately to say.....there is a solid portion of righties that fully buy the stolen election claim. Look no further than the OTB. Several of your best buddies are stolen election truthers. And if a democrat wins a narrow election in one of those repub run states.....there's little doubt that shit is going to go down.
 

kg21

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
1,340
Points
113
"Very few". You wish. How would the SCOTUS rule? I don't know and neither do you. But we do know it's a 6-3 conservative court and they are reluctant to involve themselves in election matters if they don't have to. State legislatures have the right to do it. They very well might let them.
The Supreme Court would rule in favor of a rigged election and Trump wins.

But then the idiots on your side would go after their kids and hang out at their houses. So they refused to have anything to do with it. You know, kind of Rosenbaum it and be where you shouldn't be.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,827
Reaction score
5,334
Points
113
The Supreme Court would rule in favor of a rigged election and Trump wins.

But then the idiots on your side would go after their kids and hang out at their houses. So they refused to have anything to do with it. You know, kind of Rosenbaum it and be where you shouldn't be.
We all know the right thing to do would be to crawl in through the windows of the Supreme Court building and prevent the vote from happening, like patriots do, and shout Hang Mike Roberts, maybe sit at his desk for a bit.
 

kg21

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
1,340
Points
113
We all know the right thing to do would be to crawl in through the windows of the Supreme Court building and prevent the vote from happening, like patriots do, and shout Hang Mike Roberts, maybe sit at his desk for a bit.
I had no problem with that since the election was stolen. It was for naught, which is so sad.

I saw riots for a year straight. That one seemed very calm.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,827
Reaction score
5,334
Points
113
I had no problem with that since the election was stolen. It was for naught, which is so sad.

I saw riots for a year straight. That one seemed very calm.
Just in case people deny this is an actual opinion of people, let's frame this.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
45,297
Reaction score
6,266
Points
113
Yeah well.....it's been just about a year now.....and not only is the dopey stolen election claim still going strong.....the fraudit still hasn't even wrapped up. Repub politicians have been censured and punished for speaking out against the stolen election claim.

Link?
Right wing legislatures are passing bills under the guise that the election was stolen and fraud is running rampant.
It is and it was stolen in many ways. You can start with 400 million in Facebook $$$
It's foolish to say it isn't possible considering the previous year of hysteria. Unfortunately to say.....there is a solid portion of righties that fully buy the stolen election claim. Look no further than the OTB. Several of your best buddies are stolen election truthers. And if a democrat wins a narrow election in one of those repub run states.....there's little doubt that shit is going to go down.
When I look for stupidity on the left- I look for you and Howie to post something.
 




Top Bottom