Audit Organizer Says Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots MISSING In Arizona, Boxes Full of Blank Ballots



saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113
Clicking on the above with help with Beeg's fantasy that all the ballots earmarked by the audit are from Democrats. Give it a look.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
Clicking on the above with help with Beeg's fantasy that all the ballots earmarked by the audit are from Democrats. Give it a look.
There was no fraud, but now there is fraud but not enough because party affiliations. Is that what you are saying?

Look, I have said from the beginning, we need to be on a search for the truth.
The truth is that there are a lot of anomalies in Arizona and perhaps far worse in other key areas.
The truth is that Zuckerberg put 400 million into making cheating possible in the 2020 election and we need to find out what was done and how it can never happen again.

There is no remedy for the Dem cheating of 2020. It is mission accomplished. You helped elect Joe Biden the trojan horse and now we are seeing the consequences. What we can do is get serious about never letting a shameful event like this happen again.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113
There was no fraud, but now there is fraud but not enough because party affiliations. Is that what you are saying?

Look, I have said from the beginning, we need to be on a search for the truth.
The truth is that there are a lot of anomalies in Arizona and perhaps far worse in other key areas.
The truth is that Zuckerberg put 400 million into making cheating possible in the 2020 election and we need to find out what was done and how it can never happen again.

There is no remedy for the Dem cheating of 2020. It is mission accomplished. You helped elect Joe Biden the trojan horse and now we are seeing the consequences. What we can do is get serious about never letting a shameful event like this happen again.
I'm saying your claim that all of the flagged ballots break for Biden is not supported by the audit. The break is even enough that throwing them out wouldn't change the outcome, nor does an even split support an narrative of obvious election rigging.
 


stocker08

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
26,377
Reaction score
7,456
Points
113
There was no fraud, but now there is fraud but not enough because party affiliations. Is that what you are saying?

Look, I have said from the beginning, we need to be on a search for the truth.
The truth is that there are a lot of anomalies in Arizona and perhaps far worse in other key areas.
The truth is that Zuckerberg put 400 million into making cheating possible in the 2020 election and we need to find out what was done and how it can never happen again.

There is no remedy for the Dem cheating of 2020. It is mission accomplished. You helped elect Joe Biden the trojan horse and now we are seeing the consequences. What we can do is get serious about never letting a shameful event like this happen again.

Actually....what has been said for a while is that the fraudit ninjas haven't correctly identified ballots that shouldn't have been counted. They are stretching and making up numbers. But even IF those ballots were fraudulent (they weren't) Trump still would have lost.....because the split is fairly even.

Fail.
 

stocker08

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
26,377
Reaction score
7,456
Points
113
QKPSYE7A75G6LCANK46CX52B6I.jpg
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
Actually....what has been said for a while is that the fraudit ninjas haven't correctly identified ballots that shouldn't have been counted. They are stretching and making up numbers. But even IF those ballots were fraudulent (they weren't) Trump still would have lost.....because the split is fairly even.

Fail.
You are a child.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
I'm saying your claim that all of the flagged ballots break for Biden is not supported by the audit. The break is even enough that throwing them out wouldn't change the outcome, nor does an even split support an narrative of obvious election rigging.
You have no clue what it true and you don't care. You want to settle on a result. I want to find out why 57,000 votes were messed up so that we never have this again. None of us even know how those votes were used or who even really cast them. The people that moved- who actually cast those votes? The people that moved or ballot harvesters?
 



GopherJake

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
18,867
Reaction score
2,657
Points
113
You have no clue what it true and you don't care. You want to settle on a result. I want to find out why 57,000 votes were messed up so that we never have this again. None of us even know how those votes were used or who even really cast them. The people that moved- who actually cast those votes? The people that moved or ballot harvesters?
Shut the fuck up, you fucking Moron. Yeah. Capital’M’.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
58,200
Reaction score
13,875
Points
113
Actually....what has been said for a while is that the fraudit ninjas haven't correctly identified ballots that shouldn't have been counted. They are stretching and making up numbers. But even IF those ballots were fraudulent (they weren't) Trump still would have lost.....because the split is fairly even.

Fail.
The Cyber Ninjas audit was weak and sad. Just like Beeg's hero.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
58,200
Reaction score
13,875
Points
113
You have no clue what it true and you don't care. You want to settle on a result. I want to find out why 57,000 votes were messed up so that we never have this again. None of us even know how those votes were used or who even really cast them. The people that moved- who actually cast those votes? The people that moved or ballot harvesters?
It's been explained to you multiple times. You refuse to listen. It doesn't matter, your side got what it wants out of this. Justification to ignore the actual results in 2024 and declare Dear Leader the winner in AZ, GA, PA, WI etc.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
It's been explained to you multiple times. You refuse to listen. It doesn't matter, your side got what it wants out of this. Justification to ignore the actual results in 2024 and declare Dear Leader the winner in AZ, GA, PA, WI etc.
And as usual you are lying. I want the truth. I have stated over and over again that there is no remedy that installs Trump as President as a result of the massive fraud that took place in the 2020 elections. What we need is for it to never happen again. We also need Democrats to be voted out of office in droves in 2022...not because Rs are the solution, but to slow the damage caused by the hard left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDR



Bob_Loblaw

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
14,206
Reaction score
4,084
Points
113
When you cant take a loss and move on,yes.
Yep, the only thing more disgusting than people who can't take a loss are people who can't take a loss on their end and pretend to be shocked when their opponents can't either. The last 6 years have been really f'n gross from both dems and republicans and now we're stuck in the mess they all created.
 



Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
24,620
Reaction score
2,713
Points
113
The audit proves massive fraud, and irregularity. Enough to easily swing the election to Trump. Watching he left claim this as a victory, is right up there with their big win on the Afghanistan disaster.

We see the results, and there's enough to swing it to Trump. That's without getting the Dominion servers, which Dominion (a private company), refused to comply with judicial subpoenas from the Az Senate. We also saw they wiped the entire results tabulation system clean the day before the audit began, which is a felony. And we also had the blatantly partisan AG Marland Garrick threaten Az Republicans if they tried to do a canvass. The canvass of course, is the key to one of the main claims made by the Az Reps. Then there was Dominion lying, saying their system was never online, only to find out that the wifi was wide open. And...this is just Maricopa Cty. Time to prosecute the voters, and organizers caught cheating, the Dominion officials, and cancel all Dominion machines/contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDR

USAF

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
4,255
Points
113
Seeing you this angry, makes me really happy. I'm literally smiling thinking about how out-of-your-mind-with-anger you have to be, to make that post.
The audit proves massive fraud, and irregularity. Enough to easily swing the election to Trump. Watching he left claim this as a victory, is right up there with their big win on the Afghanistan disaster.

We see the results, and there's enough to swing it to Trump. That's without getting the Dominion servers, which Dominion (a private company), refused to comply with judicial subpoenas from the Az Senate. We also saw they wiped the entire results tabulation system clean the day before the audit began, which is a felony. And we also had the blatantly partisan AG Marland Garrick threaten Az Republicans if they tried to do a canvass. The canvass of course, is the key to one of the main claims made by the Az Reps. Then there was Dominion lying, saying their system was never online, only to find out that the wifi was wide open. And...this is just Maricopa Cty. Time to prosecute the voters, and organizers caught cheating, the Dominion officials, and cancel all Dominion machines/contracts.
Oh, the irony.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113
You have no clue what it true and you don't care. You want to settle on a result. I want to find out why 57,000 votes were messed up so that we never have this again. None of us even know how those votes were used or who even really cast them. The people that moved- who actually cast those votes? The people that moved or ballot harvesters?
If the audit is to be trusted, we do know how the votes were used.
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
22,581
Reaction score
6,410
Points
113
It's been explained to you multiple times. You refuse to listen. It doesn't matter, your side got what it wants out of this. Justification to ignore the actual results in 2024 and declare Dear Leader the winner in AZ, GA, PA, WI etc.
Right, this “audit” will definitely give people the right to do that. And courts will be forced to allow that now because of this “audit”. The supreme court’s hands are tied. But the “audit” only allows that for the Rs. Not the Ds. As usual, a totally rational theory from you. Not bat sh!t crazy at all. Man the Rs are evil.
 

USAF

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
4,255
Points
113
Right, this “audit” will definitely give people the right to do that. And courts will be forced to allow that now because of this “audit”. The supreme court’s hands are tied. But the “audit” only allows that for the Rs. Not the Ds. As usual, a totally rational theory from you. Not bat sh!t crazy at all. Man the Rs are evil.
Spoof rides in to claim the fraudit proves it's the Democrats who are bat shit crazy.

You can't make this up.

Fraud.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113

FACT FOCUS: AZ election review spurs false claims online​

By ALI SWENSON and ANGELO FICHERA, AP
16 hours ago






Presenting its findings in a six-month-long review of the 2020 presidential election in Arizona’s largest county on Friday, a Republican-backed cybersecurity firm ended in much the same place where it began: without any evidence to contradict certified election results showing Joe Biden won.
Still, the Cyber Ninjas firm, which had never audited an election before, spread numerous falsehoods that ignored the basic facts of how elections work in Maricopa County, including unfounded claims about duplicate ballots, missing files and illegitimate votes.
Over the weekend, bits of the firm’s findings — including from various drafts of its report — proliferated on social media, driving a surge in false posts suggesting the election results were flawed. Biden won Maricopa County by about 45,000 votes, key to his 10,500-vote win of Arizona.
Here’s a closer look at some of the claims.
CLAIM: More than 57,000 ballots cast in Maricopa County had serious issues and should have been disqualified.
THE FACTS: That's not true. The number is calculated from a laundry list of misleading and debunked claims in a draft version of the report.
Claims that there were 57,734 ballots with “serious issues,” that were “illegal” or that “should’ve been disqualified” are citing the sum of what a draft of the report called “Ballots Impacted.” The draft itself noted, “In many cases there could be legitimate and legal votes within the Ballots Impact amount.”
In fact, the three largest components of the total — all of the purported ballot issues billed as being either “critical” or “high” severity — are flawed.
One of the “critical” figures included in the total is 23,344 mail-in ballots cast by people who allegedly moved before ballots were sent out. But that number is based on a commercial database unrelated to elections, and it doesn’t mean something improper happened. Election officials explained many voters move to temporary locations while still legally voting at their registered address.
Another claim rolled into the total is that 9,041 voters were recorded as receiving one mail-in ballot, but returning two. However, Maricopa County said on Twitter that this occurs when a voter returns a ballot with a signature discrepancy — such as a blank or mismatched signature — and election officials contact the voter to resolve the issue. A second record is then created in the system. In those cases, of course, only one ballot is counted per voter.
The draft report also included the flawed claim that there were 10,342 voters who voted in multiple counties.
__
CLAIM: Voters who voted in multiple counties totaled 10,342.
THE FACTS: This claim from a draft version of Cyber Ninjas’ report is false. The number is a tally of votes from people who share the same full names and birth years. Experts say such overlap is common in a county where more than two million people cast ballots.
County officials offered an example on Twitter: “If you search for Maria Garcia born in 1980, you’ll get 7 active voters in Maricopa County and 12 statewide. And that’s just one name.”
Election officials typically rely on additional information to maintain voter lists, such as the complete birth date and last four digits of a voter’s Social Security number.
Cyber Ninjas softened its language in the final report, saying it was plausible that the repeated names and birth years could come from “legitimate, separate individual voters.”
__
CLAIM: More than 17,000 duplicate ballots were counted in the 2020 presidential election in Maricopa County.
THE FACTS: No, they weren’t. Shiva Ayyadurai, the COVID-19 vaccine skeptic and failed U.S. Senate candidate who made this claim, based his analysis on images of ballot envelopes, not ballots. Contrary to Ayyadurai’s assessment, images of the same ballot envelope often exist but the ballot inside is counted only once.
County election officials say they re-scan images of ballot envelopes anytime a voter submits an envelope with a blank or mismatched signature and it gets resolved. When the county contacts the voter and he or she signs the envelope, a new image of the envelope is captured.
Since the Senate’s subpoena requested all the ballot envelope images, the county included both original and duplicate envelope images, even though each ballot was only counted once.
Ayyadurai also pointed out that many duplicate ballot envelope images came in after Election Day. There’s a simple explanation for that: Under Arizona law, there is a period of five business days after an election during which voters can address certain irregularities with their ballots. Maricopa County hired additional staff to contact voters and resolve discrepancies in the final days of voting and in the days after the election.
Social media users seized on a moment in Ayyadurai’s presentation when he said that Maricopa County had failed to list the duplicate ballots in its canvass report. But that report lists how many ballots were cast, counted and rejected, and does not address scanned images of ballot envelopes.
___
CLAIM: Maricopa County purged the machine records from the 2020 election the day before an outside review of the vote started.
THE FACTS: The data never disappeared. While officials moved election data off a server and onto backup drives to prepare for a county-commissioned audit in February, they archived and retained it all, the county confirmed.
Maricopa County denied claims that it had been “CAUGHT” intentionally deleting data in some kind of sinister plot, explaining there is not enough space for the data to remain on the server indefinitely.
“We have backups for all Nov. data & those archives were never subpoenaed,” Maricopa County tweeted on Friday.
__
Associated Press writer Jude Joffe-Block contributed to this report from Phoenix.
__
This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.
Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
 

GopherJake

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
18,867
Reaction score
2,657
Points
113
They should just claim that 57 million ballots should have been thrown out. It's equally valid to the current claim. Go big or go home.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
If the audit is to be trusted, we do know how the votes were used.
No, we don't because of the way they ruined the chain of custody, failed to do signature checks, allowed ballot harvesting, and basically broke every rule in the book in addition to using all the new cheating methods that were made up.

What you are saying is tantamount to telling the IRS auditor is not trustable because you hid your tax documents and he is having a hard time putting the facts back together. That's insane. But that's what you are arguing here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDR

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113
No, we don't because of the way they ruined the chain of custody, failed to do signature checks, allowed ballot harvesting, and basically broke every rule in the book in addition to using all the new cheating methods that were made up.

What you are saying is tantamount to telling the IRS auditor is not trustable because you hid your tax documents and he is having a hard time putting the facts back together. That's insane. But that's what you are arguing here...
You are essentially saying the whole Ninja audit is worthless, and all we have to work with is the suspicion that the other side is dirty. Why bother, if this is your conclusion?
 


bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
You are essentially saying the whole Ninja audit is worthless, and all we have to work with is the suspicion that the other side is dirty. Why bother, if this is your conclusion?
Well that was the most Howie post you have written. You dodged my point, because you can't refute it and then made up a false position on my behalf. Move to the front of the Howie line.

No. I am not saying anything of the sort. The ninja audit essentially shows that the county lost chain of custody and broke their own rules. It demands accountability (before the people) to explain why this all happened. We know for a fact that the county internal audit was a joke and their own guy Churci, is on tape saying so. Their reject rate on mail in ballots, for example was .3%. Normal reject rates for Arizona mail in or provisional ballots is 2%. So normally 42,000 of the 2.1 million Maricopa County votes would have been rejected. In 2020? 6000 rejects. The mail ins are heavy Biden vote weighted. Signature steps stopped being done. Harvesting occurred heavily. Dead people voted. Non- residents voted and we still do not know fit there was machine manipulation. Why did they try so hard to withhold the equipment? Why did they fight the audit at every turn?

Again, the point of this is not to install Trump at this point. We have the Biden administration and we will be paying for losing control of our elections for the next 4 years. That's baked in. We have to hold people accountable. Never again should there be a mass mail in/ vote harvesting election like this. As I say this California is in the midst of passing a law requiring every voter be sent a mail in ballot- push ballots. The Democrats are out to make the elections dirtier and dirtier. No ID, just mail out that ballots and take them back in. This is ripe for massive fraud and it is exactly what the Dems want because they are willing to play the election game that way. You want it to happen because you are a lefty. The ends justify the means for you.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
58,200
Reaction score
13,875
Points
113
Right, this “audit” will definitely give people the right to do that. And courts will be forced to allow that now because of this “audit”. The supreme court’s hands are tied. But the “audit” only allows that for the Rs. Not the Ds. As usual, a totally rational theory from you. Not bat sh!t crazy at all. Man the Rs are evil.
As long as they "follow" their newly passed state laws, SCOTUS won't stop them. The R's fire local election officials in the Atlanta area. Take over "counting" the votes. Trump wins.

SCOTUS is loath to involve themselves in political processes no matter how much Fool2 assures you that Trump's plan for Pence to declare him the winner could never have happened.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
4,820
Points
113
Well that was the most Howie post you have written. You dodged my point, because you can't refute it and then made up a false position on my behalf. Move to the front of the Howie line.

No. I am not saying anything of the sort. The ninja audit essentially shows that the county lost chain of custody and broke their own rules. It demands accountability (before the people) to explain why this all happened. We know for a fact that the county internal audit was a joke and their own guy Churci, is on tape saying so. Their reject rate on mail in ballots, for example was .3%. Normal reject rates for Arizona mail in or provisional ballots is 2%. So normally 42,000 of the 2.1 million Maricopa County votes would have been rejected. In 2020? 6000 rejects. The mail ins are heavy Biden vote weighted. Signature steps stopped being done. Harvesting occurred heavily. Dead people voted. Non- residents voted and we still do not know fit there was machine manipulation. Why did they try so hard to withhold the equipment? Why did they fight the audit at every turn?

Again, the point of this is not to install Trump at this point. We have the Biden administration and we will be paying for losing control of our elections for the next 4 years. That's baked in. We have to hold people accountable. Never again should there be a mass mail in/ vote harvesting election like this. As I say this California is in the midst of passing a law requiring every voter be sent a mail in ballot- push ballots. The Democrats are out to make the elections dirtier and dirtier. No ID, just mail out that ballots and take them back in. This is ripe for massive fraud and it is exactly what the Dems want because they are willing to play the election game that way. You want it to happen because you are a lefty. The ends justify the means for you.
The reject rate was lower because they spent more resources curing the ballots--if a signature has a problem, they made a strong effort to help the voter get it right.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,722
Reaction score
5,727
Points
113
The reject rate was lower because they spent more resources curing the ballots--if a signature has a problem, they made a strong effort to help the voter get it right.
hmmmm- or they stopped checking signatures at all. So you are telling me that with this unheard of influx of mail in ballots they had more time to make sure they fixed them and they were more thorough than in the past when there were far fewer. You are really straining here. Doesn't it cause you a little embarrassment to try this hard to defend cheating?

It gives you no pause to see a Democrat run party "curing ballots" with new found super efficiency versus state history- often not allowing oversight?

There are so many problems with this that a logical person would see......
 




Top Bottom