Ask a Mizzou Fan

MizzouMatt

New member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
First of all, congrats on the great season. I know you all had a couple of close calls against quality teams (and one against a not-so quality team, but hey, stones and glass houses and all...) but still turned in a great result landing in the Citrus Bowl.

Much of my family attended the U including both of my parents who hold degrees at both U of M and Mizzou. Still have a good number of relatives who live in Minnesota and are big supporters of the Gophers. Been to Minnesota MANY times and consider it one of my favorite spots to spend free time...in the summer months at least.

Anyway...

Seeing as that we don't know much, if anything about our respective opponents, I've been spending a few days lurking on the board. Found some good info here. I've also notice the complaints that there are no quality Mizzou boards to gather info, and that's right. Tigerboard is a relic and generally, a free for all with little information. PowerMizzou is fantastic, but is a paysite and their free board has no traffic.

I don't hold myself out as the end all be all expert on things Mizzou related, granted. But, I thought I'd offer to answer any questions about the program, the conference, our season, our squad, matchups, the state or whatever you want.

Congrats again on the season and I look forward to an entertaining game.
 

What did most Mizzou fans prefer, joining the SEC or the Big Ten?
 

What did most Mizzou fans prefer, joining the SEC or the Big Ten?

I think it was pretty split...StL region was all B10,KC region was stay B12,Ozarks region had dreams of the Sec but it never seemed possible.Everyone was Ok with the move to the BIG after a fashion! But after we got jilted by The B10 most fans where resigned to the dis-functional B12...we had little belief the Sec was even a possibility. Once the process was in motion the Fan base was never more excited and determined to make it happen. Sec chants at games,sec t-shirts etc and big money boosters backing it as well. I saw none of that excitement during the B10 days. Personally I wanted the SEC hands down...nothing wrong with the BIG but the SEC is the most prestiges and football centered conference in the nation.

The sports fans love the Sec....the egg head academic types still covet and dream of the B10!
 

How has your rivalry with KU changed since you switched conferences? Is there still a strong mutual hatred in both sports between the schools?

As an aside, I was working for the KU Sports Information department in the late 1990s and I was there during Norm Stewart's last season when he knocked off KU in his last appearance at AFH. One of my post-game duties was to immediately deliver stat sheets to the opposing teams locker room so I was the only non-member of the Missouri program in the locker room to witness the celebration and Stewart's raw emotion. It was incredible.

Go Gophers!!
 



How are your ticket sales going for this Bowl game? How many fans do you expect to have in Orlando?
 

General thoughts on keys to the game? Seems like it will be strength vs. strength when we have the ball: you guys are quite good at stopping the run, and if we had our way, we wouldn't even attempt a pass. Tevin Coleman was the only back all year to burn the Mizzou D, though we run a different style than what you're used to seeing in the SEC. How about when the Tigers are on offense - what to expect there? I know Mauk was up-and-down, probably in large part to losing such a talented receiving corps from last year, but Hansbrough-Murphy seems to be a pretty dangerous 1-2 punch.
 

I think it was pretty split...StL region was all B10,KC region was stay B12,Ozarks region had dreams of the Sec but it never seemed possible.Everyone was Ok with the move to the BIG after a fashion! But after we got jilted by The B10 most fans where resigned to the dis-functional B12...we had little belief the Sec was even a possibility. Once the process was in motion the Fan base was never more excited and determined to make it happen. Sec chants at games,sec t-shirts etc and big money boosters backing it as well. I saw none of that excitement during the B10 days. Personally I wanted the SEC hands down...nothing wrong with the BIG but the SEC is the most prestiges and football centered conference in the nation.

The sports fans love the Sec....the egg head academic types still covet and dream of the B10!

Big screw-up by Delany not taking Mizzou. If it's FB vs FB, the Nebraska legacy trumps Mizzou. Personally I don't think Nebraska will ever be what it was in football, and Mizzou seems to be moving up.

Everything else:........Mizzou wins the debate:
Basketball
TV sets
Academics
 

What were the top reasons why Mizzou wanted out of the B12. I'm guessing they all started with Texas.
 



Big screw-up by Delany not taking Mizzou. If it's FB vs FB, the Nebraska legacy trumps Mizzou. Personally I don't think Nebraska will ever be what it was in football, and Mizzou seems to be moving up.

Everything else:........Mizzou wins the debate:
Basketball
TV sets
Academics

I'd have taken both Nebraska and Mizzou personally. Then take Maryland as well, leave Rutgers alone. Shift Purdue to the East division and plunk Mizzou in the West. Boom, great setup.
 

I hope Matt doesn't mind me sharing some of my opinions as a Mizzou fan.



What did most Mizzou fans prefer, joining the SEC or the Big Ten?

You have to remember that it wasn't an either/or situation, which I"m sure you know...

I'm from St. Louis, and I can tell you that in 2010, many if not most Mizzou fans were eager for the move to the B1G. Yes, we'd lose the kU rivalry (k is never capitalized in kansas, mind you...F them). However, it would get us away from Texas' control of the Big 12. Make no mistake, UT runs that conference. The conference didn't share revenue equally, and Mizzou often was getting pennies when Texas and OU were making fortunes. Bottom Line: It was an ABUSIVE relationship, and Mizzou needed to move on. The B1G seemed like a natural transition. I mean, we'd even have a natural rival in Illinois...

I have to tell you, when it was announced that NU was getting the B1G bid over Mizzou, people were devastated... Some fans were calling for the University President's head. It was bad. We felt trapped... In fact, people feared that if Texas, OU, OSU, and Texas Tech/A&M would leave for the PAC, we'd get stuck in the Mountain West... No joke. Those were conversations on PowerMizzou, the true Mizzou message board for fans in the know (unfortunately, it's a subscribed service.)

When the SEC offer came along a year later, we were ALL in shock. We didn't see it. Needless to say, the entire state was thrilled... except I think there was SOME reservation in the KC area. The kU rivalry and the kSU rivalry is in their backyard, but I would say they've gotten over it... I mean, the road games, tailgating, and atmosphere of SEC football truly is extraordinary. It's been much more fun going to the Grove at Ole Miss versus another game in freezing Ames, Iowa.

Consequently, season tickets are at all time highs, and donations are through the roof. Mizzou has been able to pour millions into facilities and upgrading our stadium. Within the next 5+ years, we'll seat in the 80K range... we're around 72K now. It's been very good and very profitable for the university.


How has your rivalry with KU changed since you switched conferences? Is there still a strong mutual hatred in both sports between the schools?

As an aside, I was working for the KU Sports Information department in the late 1990s and I was there during Norm Stewart's last season when he knocked off KU in his last appearance at AFH. One of my post-game duties was to immediately deliver stat sheets to the opposing teams locker room so I was the only non-member of the Missouri program in the locker room to witness the celebration and Stewart's raw emotion. It was incredible.

Go Gophers!!

Well, I'm sorry to hear you worked for those dirty birds to the west. ;)

I actually worked for Mizzou's SID from 01-04. Fun experience. But I'm glad not to work in sports these days...

To answer your question: The hate still exists (at least on our end), but unfortunately, the rivalry is dead... for now. kU refuses to play us in anything. We reach out to them every year -- to play even basketball, where we've really tumbled. But they won't do it. They have a major case of butt hurt over us leaving a dying conference, while they have no real options.

I'm sure, however, in the next decade the rivalry will be rekindled. I mean, it has too. It's one of the oldest rivalries in the country... and as you saw from Coach Stewart, people are VERY passionate about it.



What's the key to beating you?

I'll try and make this short: The key is to keep our defense on the field the whole game. Our defense is exceptional against the run and the pass -- the only true blip being that Indiana game, but we were without two of our best players (Golden for the whole game; Ray for much of it). HOWEVER, our offense is wildly inconsistent and average at best... Our receivers are among the country leaders in dropped balls. And while Mauk throws an excellent deep ball, he's inconsistent on short and intermediate passes.

Soooo... Force our offense into a bunch of three and outs. Win the time of possession. And eventually you'll wear down our defense and be able to put up points. Your defense playing well is the key.


How are your ticket sales going for this Bowl game? How many fans do you expect to have in Orlando?

I'm not really sure. I wish I could share info, but I don't have it.


General thoughts on keys to the game? Seems like it will be strength vs. strength when we have the ball: you guys are quite good at stopping the run, and if we had our way, we wouldn't even attempt a pass. Tevin Coleman was the only back all year to burn the Mizzou D, though we run a different style than what you're used to seeing in the SEC. How about when the Tigers are on offense - what to expect there? I know Mauk was up-and-down, probably in large part to losing such a talented receiving corps from last year, but Hansbrough-Murphy seems to be a pretty dangerous 1-2 punch.

The Tigers went through an identity crisis on offense after the Indiana and Georgia loses. The coaches realized we need to run the ball more. And that's really what Mizzou has done. We've run the ball very well for the most part... Marcus Murphy is our starting back. He also is one of the best returners in the country (both in punts and kick offs). He's very much a speed back that prefers running on the edges. Hansborough, while not a big guy, runs big and angry. The kid rarely loses yards on carries. He's much more of our between the tackles runner. Both kids are very talented. Murphy may have a chance in the NFL because of his return skills...

The passing game is... well... we never know... We have three highly recruited receivers in Bud Sasser (who's the best), Jimmy Hunt, and Darius White. All three of these kids were Four or Five-Star talents, according to Rivals and Scouts. However, all of them have been back-ups until now... their senior year. And we know why: They struggle to catch the ball. Mizzou is one of the leaders in the country in dropped passes. It's very frustrating.

Mauk, our QB, has had an up and down year, but he is only a sophomore. He really struggle in the middle of the year, but is playing better now. He struggles with the short and intermediate passes -- often throwing them too hard. HOwever, his talent is throwing the bomb. Almost every game he's had at least one, if not two or three, LONG receptions. He really excels at throwing deep balls... it's by far his biggest talent. And it's something that must be defended...

It should be noted that Mauk, for whatever reason, loves to scramble and often does so to his detriment... running into pressure, peeling back as much as 20 yards from the line of scrimmage. It kills drives when he gets sacked... because they're HUGE loses. The key to stopping the Mizzou pass game is -- no shocker -- apply pressure.
 

What were the top reasons why Mizzou wanted out of the B12. I'm guessing they all started with Texas.


See my answer in my post above -- Texas greed. They ran the Big 12. They didn't allow even revenue distribution. They wanted their own TV network. It simply wasn't fair to the other member institutions... Mizzou was leaving tons of money on the table by staying in, what I call, an abusive relationship. I, and most Mizzou fans, loathe Texas. I hate 'em.
 

See my answer in my post above -- Texas greed. They ran the Big 12. They didn't allow even revenue distribution. They wanted their own TV network. It simply wasn't fair to the other member institutions... Mizzou was leaving tons of money on the table by staying in, what I call, an abusive relationship. I, and most Mizzou fans, loathe Texas. I hate 'em.

I've always liked Mizzou and wish they would have found a way into the B1G. If we do another expansion you would be a great fit. However, with the success you're having in the SEC, I doubt that would ever happen. One thing is for sure, your move to the SEC has been a huge success.
 



Which SEC school/fans do you guys feel the most kindred spirit with thus far? I was thinking perhaps Arkansas simply due to state proximity. But perhaps there is another school you guys feel closest to. Thoughts?
 

I've always liked Mizzou and wish they would have found a way into the B1G. If we do another expansion you would be a great fit. However, with the success you're having in the SEC, I doubt that would ever happen. One thing is for sure, your move to the SEC has been a huge success.

It has been a great transition for us.

Which SEC school/fans do you guys feel the most kindred spirit with thus far? I was thinking perhaps Arkansas simply due to state proximity. But perhaps there is another school you guys feel closest to. Thoughts?

Definitely not Arkansas. The two states, especially if you're from southern MO, NEVER got along much. I see it as a blossoming rivalry. It burns their a$$ that we've beaten them in football this year and blew them out in our bowl game in 08.

I'm not sure we have another program where we feel like buddies. I will say that, before my son was born this year, I went to most road games. The hospitality of the southern fan is second to none. I know Minnesota may never play Ole Miss, but you really must go to Oxford and experience the Grove. It's southern hospitality to the "T". But really, I've had great times in Oxford, Knoxville, Lexington, Nashville (love Nashville) etc...

Really, for St. Louis Mizzou fans (and St. Louis, by far, as the most MU alums), many of our road games have gotten closer since moving to the SEC... Nashville is 5 hours. Lexington is 5 hours. Oxford is 5 hours. Knoxville is a little over 6 hours. Arkansas is 5 hours. Mississippi State is around 7 hours... When we were in the Big 12, the closest schools were Lawrence (5 hours) and Aimes (6 hours). Everything else really required a flight.

You know, if there's anyone we feel some kindred spirit with, I'd say it's Texas A&M, simply because we're both the "new guys."
 

I'll get to each question chronologically, but it may take me a while.

What did most Mizzou fans prefer, joining the SEC or the Big Ten?

It wasn't really an "either/or" situation. In 2010, all the talk centered on the Big 10. We wanted out of the Big 12. I think events since our departure have adequately explained why. Our first option was the Big 10, because it seemed obvious. You all had 11 teams, we were had no "ties" to bring. Then Nebraska jumped in. We later find that they were even more concerned (rightly so) so they jumped on a Junior Membership offer. At the time, it was disappointing.

Then a year passes, and aTm is talking about making the jump to the SEC. Yada, yada, yada...Mizzou ends up in the SEC.

It's not really possible to say what we would have preferred at the time, as the options were never both available at the same time.

As for now?

Most would say SEC. Obviously it's our home now, so you're going to have biases. Most Mizzou fans recognize the pros of each. But the big one was obviously the immediate fully vested membership. The mainly football fans love the SEC. The mainly hoops fans would've probably preferred the Big 10. The football road trips edge goes to the SEC, the academic side goes to the Big 10.

What it comes down to is this: Mizzou was in a terrible conference situation and needed a home. One offered a great set up, while the other did not. Therefore, the SEC is the preference. Both have their strengths.

Personally, I would've been fine with either.
 

How has your rivalry with KU changed since you switched conferences? Is there still a strong mutual hatred in both sports between the schools?

As an aside, I was working for the KU Sports Information department in the late 1990s and I was there during Norm Stewart's last season when he knocked off KU in his last appearance at AFH. One of my post-game duties was to immediately deliver stat sheets to the opposing teams locker room so I was the only non-member of the Missouri program in the locker room to witness the celebration and Stewart's raw emotion. It was incredible.

Go Gophers!!

Absolutely it has. I'm on the east side of the state, so I don't deal with ku fans on a daily basis. That makes a huge difference. There is still a hatred, but for me, it never has a chance to manifest itself. There's the deep rooted history between the states/schools that will never go away.

But, again, since we don't meet on the field, it's definitely different. If Mizzou and kansas ever meet up (in a sport that people follow), it will pick right back up.
 



What's the key to beating you?

Scoring more points.

But seriously, I'd say the keys to the game are this:

1. Get a lead early. Perhaps more accurately, don't fall behind early. Mizzou's strength is generating a pass rush. The ends get all of the discussion (and rightly so), but we have a rotation 4-deep at DT that are very good players. Only Alabama and Georgia have neutralized them, and it's taken gameplanning for them to do it. If you're behind and don't have a top passing game, you're in trouble.

2. Don't make mistakes. Mizzou feasts on turnovers. Teams that don't turn the ball over have the best chance at beating us. Mizzou is often careless with penalties, so if you commit just a few, you'll likely have the advantage.

3. Keep the defense honest. This ties in with number 1. If you're only running, or only passing, Mizzou will stop that with little issue. The teams that beat Mizzou can move the ball on the ground and are effective at play-action.

4. Stopping Mizzou on offense is kind of a mystery. Sometimes they're good, sometimes air could stop them. Mauk has a tendency to bail with pressure, especially when it comes up the middle. If you make him roll out, your chances of success go way up (despite hitting a few in the SEC title game)
 

How are your ticket sales going for this Bowl game? How many fans do you expect to have in Orlando?

Honestly, haven't heard much. Mizzou has always had the rap of a light traveling fanbase (sometimes deserved). In the bigger bowl games we've went to (Cotton, namely) we've brought 25K+. Mizzou has been traveling better to road games in SEC play (in part because our biggest alumni base is in STL which is now closer).

I'd imagine Mizzou has 15-20K if I had to guess. I think a lot of families will make the trip due to timing and location, as I'm sure is the case with you all.

The SEC title game confuses things a little bit sense it's short notice and often eats into the travel budget of some fans. Not to mention it's not much closer than the bowl game.
 

General thoughts on keys to the game? Seems like it will be strength vs. strength when we have the ball: you guys are quite good at stopping the run, and if we had our way, we wouldn't even attempt a pass. Tevin Coleman was the only back all year to burn the Mizzou D, though we run a different style than what you're used to seeing in the SEC. How about when the Tigers are on offense - what to expect there? I know Mauk was up-and-down, probably in large part to losing such a talented receiving corps from last year, but Hansbrough-Murphy seems to be a pretty dangerous 1-2 punch.

As i mentioned in another post, Mizzou is kind of an enigma on offense. At times they look dynamic through the air, at times they can't complete a pass. Mizzou jammed the ball down a good Arkansas defense's throat, and then couldn't gain a yard against Alabama (obviously some great competition).

Mizzou probably wants to run it 60-40, unless the defense is stacking the box. The like working the perimeter with the pass. Bud Sasser, an All-SEC receiver is a very good possession guy. He's the guy that makes the tough catches. Jimmie Hunt is a complete enigma. Turns in a huge play, drops a TD on the next pass. Darius White got off to a hot start as a deep threat, but injuries and better defenses have negated him. Hansbrough and Murphy are good backs. Murphy is more of a multi-threat guy with better top end speed. Hansbrough is the primary option, and not dissimilar from Cobb in terms of style. The line has good games, they have average games.

Mauk is the x-factor. He's like a Manziel mixed with Joel Stave early this year (I know you'll get that reference). He really struggled midway through the year completing easy passes. He seems to have corrected that. He's usually a boom or bust type guy, but the staff has worked on him being more consistent. He played a pretty good game against Alabama considering he got little help from the run game.

Bottom line is think back to the dynamic Mizzou offenses of recent years past...and forget all of it. We've got little in common with those squads.
 

What were the top reasons why Mizzou wanted out of the B12. I'm guessing they all started with Texas.

Started with, ended with, and everything in between.

Texas wanted the Big 12 to be their league. Between moving the offices from KC to Dallas to starting up the Longhorn Network (still have yet to see who actually carries that).

Other teams were looking around (both in the Big 12 and elsewhere) and the Big 12 was not stable. Revenue sharing wasn't equal, and the Big 12 lagged behind others in terms of revenue.

The fear was that if we weren't proactive, the league would bust and everyone would fend for themselves. If we waited too long, the Big 10 would be full, the SEC would be full, and Mizzou would be SOL.

Then there were the bowls. Finishing 10-2 in 2010 got us a 7th place bowl slot and a trip to Tempe for the Insight Bowl. Finishing in 10-2 in the SEC got us a 4th place bowl slot and a trip to the Citrus.

Once teams started jumping, there was no other option. They seemed to have pulled out of the death spiral, but I think it's only temporary. Should OU or UT move, the league is shot. We took that out of their hands and put it in ours.

Outhouse to the penthouse.
 

Which SEC school/fans do you guys feel the most kindred spirit with thus far? I was thinking perhaps Arkansas simply due to state proximity. But perhaps there is another school you guys feel closest to. Thoughts?

None, really.

It's definitely an assimilation process.

We're definitely thought of as the outsiders. A 5-7 pants-crapping in year 1 didn't help. The back to back East wins have certainly helped us get "known."

I guess in a way we're similar to aTm. Came from the same conference, at the same time, and are dealing with the same transition. We've played them every year. So there's some of that.

We're not really hated yet (besides Arkansas, but they're just jealous we've done in 3 years what they've done in 20+).

Every road trip has been great in terms of opposing fans.
 

Started with, ended with, and everything in between.

Texas wanted the Big 12 to be their league. Between moving the offices from KC to Dallas to starting up the Longhorn Network (still have yet to see who actually carries that).

Other teams were looking around (both in the Big 12 and elsewhere) and the Big 12 was not stable. Revenue sharing wasn't equal, and the Big 12 lagged behind others in terms of revenue.

The fear was that if we weren't proactive, the league would bust and everyone would fend for themselves. If we waited too long, the Big 10 would be full, the SEC would be full, and Mizzou would be SOL.

Then there were the bowls. Finishing 10-2 in 2010 got us a 7th place bowl slot and a trip to Tempe for the Insight Bowl. Finishing in 10-2 in the SEC got us a 4th place bowl slot and a trip to the Citrus.

Once teams started jumping, there was no other option. They seemed to have pulled out of the death spiral, but I think it's only temporary. Should OU or UT move, the league is shot. We took that out of their hands and put it in ours.

Outhouse to the penthouse.


The constant bowl game snubs was absolutely infuriating.
 


Well Mizzou Bob & Matt and the rest of you: You're going to see first hand about the wisconsin/Minnesota rivalry with the news on Gary Anderson. My guess is there will be no prisoners taken. Sit back and enjoy.
 

The Key to the game is on offense......Mauk has to play within himself! He is a gunslinger and is usually looking for a big play down field....He loves to chuck it deep and break the pocket in a effort to do so all the while ignoring the underneath routes and the flare back who are wide open. He has gotten better a bit in the latter part of the season but still has a long ways to go IMO to be a better than avg. QB. In our offense 50% comp. rate is Lousy and won't get it done. To counter act some of His freelancing junk the OC wisely started to rely on the Run game...problem is that our OL is just avg. at best....We do run the Ole counter Trey well and vary that scheme by even pulling our OC as opposed to backside OG/OT. That has been our most effective run play but we still lack in that dept... we can't Hoss it up and even bucket step with much success in a simple zone play. Our WR are not real Great either....Sasser is GOOD but not Great,Hunt is very inconsistent and drops way to many balls....White is a Disaster for the most part A 4 star who doesn't live up to his hype, but at 6'3 and with some speed teams respect him. TE Culkin not a great blocker and has avg. hands. Mauk would be well served to run straight ahead more but we don't.

In short our offense is very,very flawed....We have been winning on the Big play usually a broken pass play to Sasser sometimes Hunt.....outside of the ARK. game where we wore them down late and gashed them in the run game. But if we can put up some points and make a drive or two and not get a lot of yellow flags...I believe most penalty laden team in the SEC....then it allows Our DEF to dictate the game. A bit of a footnote all the yellow this year is not the norm GP squads usually are in the top 3 LEAST penalty ladden squads...not sure what is the problem this year. Some insiders blame it on Mauk said his gunslinger Freelance style has sort of creeped into the whole offense. One thing about Mauk is he does have a air about him and he is a winner and a Leader. He just needs to mature up IMO in certain aspects of his game.

Our Def. is nails....I know BAMA put of a lot of points on us as did UGA but that was a by product of the Offense not doing their fair share. Our Front 4 is really stout, 2 top flight DE and the Back ups are good. The DT all 4 of them are really good. LB's are above Avg. not great but pretty salty and the DB's are strong as well. Webb at safety is really good and Dennis at CB can make a lot of plays and is physical. We create a lot Turnovers. And we can score off of them...Check out the Florida Box score!

This game will ride on the Offense....if we score and move the ball then we can win. If we sputter around and go 3 and out late in the Game you will expose us and wear our Def. down and take home the victory.
 

How has your rivalry with KU changed since you switched conferences? Is there still a strong mutual hatred in both sports between the schools?

As an aside, I was working for the KU Sports Information department in the late 1990s and I was there during Norm Stewart's last season when he knocked off KU in his last appearance at AFH. One of my post-game duties was to immediately deliver stat sheets to the opposing teams locker room so I was the only non-member of the Missouri program in the locker room to witness the celebration and Stewart's raw emotion. It was incredible.

Go Gophers!!


To me the Rivalry is dead... I will always Hate KU but I don't ever want to play them again....To many Mizzou fans seem desperate to renew the rivalry....WHO fracken cares we have SEC teams to battle why waste our time on KU a lame Basketball school. We gain nothing by playing them, if we win we are suppose to we are a SEC team and a better program...if we lose they stick it in our gullet and have braggin rights. Let's not throw them a bone in the KC region or Mizzou land.
 

Big screw-up by Delany not taking Mizzou. If it's FB vs FB, the Nebraska legacy trumps Mizzou. Personally I don't think Nebraska will ever be what it was in football, and Mizzou seems to be moving up.

Everything else:........Mizzou wins the debate:
Basketball


TV sets
Academics

I agree it was a Mess up by Delany...he was getting greedy IMO...Dr.Tom panicked and didn't want to be left out in the Cold and he gave a Great Sales pitch to the B10 powers that be. We where a bit standoffish in our reservation about a junior membership..we don't have the Cash support like NU to take a partial share and remain competitive for very long..so when NU agreed and seemed ready and was a Much better brand as well it was only natural for the B10 to put us on the back burner for a later date. That made good business sense get the Better brand upfront and then come and take us when the B12 was folding and get the TV markets and when we had to take the JR membership or head to the MWC and doom.

Nobody ever suspected we could land in the SEC.....thank GoSH for Dr.Tom because the exposure,Hype,access to recruits,and revenue is UNREAL and can't hardly be surpassed. He saved us from ourselves. I'm sure Delany and the rest of the B10 thought we would be theirs in the next go around and Locking up STL,KC and the Springfield region TV markets 3 in the top 75 in the nation would of been a huge windfall for them.....Now it's just another feather in the SEC mega ESPN/SECN deal.......In fact this whole thing is like we sort of won the Football lottery in a way.

Don't get me wrong if we had headed to the B10 that would of been fine,but the SEC is football. Love the old school tradition and history of the B10,but the passion and pride in the SEC is a thing to behold.

P.S. The gulf between The SEC and the other conferences isn't as Great as many would lead you to believe. The SEC is the best conference but it's not like the teams are head and shoulders above the other squads.
 




Top Bottom