As Florida shatters its record for new coronavirus cases, Democrats ask, 'Where is Ron DeSantis?'

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
Liar. I am calling out clearly false data. Do you believe only one person per day in Florida is dying of Covid while every other state of similar size has dozens of deaths?
How Florida is reporting their Deaths has been discussed many times on here. You know very well what the truth is and you just choose to be dishonest. Again. Par for the course. DHB.
 


Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
1/6/22:

CA: 73,413 cases; 108 deaths

TX: 46,448 cases; 121 deaths

GA: 23,813 cases; 72 deaths

SD: 2,183 cases; 13 deaths

FL: 67,369 cases; 1 death

One of these nubmers is obviously absurd and false. Any idiot can see it.

Someone is lying again.

Florida reported 81 deaths on January 6th. They also don't report deaths daily.

This has been discussed before. Everyone should take note at just how dishonest you are.

 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
61,172
Reaction score
16,575
Points
113
Florida started reporting their cases and deaths at the end of the week months ago. Many months ago.

That’s why the chart below looks like it does. They average the cases and deaths over the course of the week, and report it that way. It’s not the same number of people actually dying in the same amounts each day that week.

Moron. Like I said, you have no clue what you are talking about.

View attachment 16393
If they're only reporting weekly, why is there a daily # for cases? And why even the 1 death then? Are they reporting daily or not?

SD went to weekly reporting for awhile when #'s were low. But there was only data of any kind1 day per week. And since Florida is in a massive wave, it seems daily reporting might be prudent in any event?
 

KGF

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
22,522
Reaction score
4,294
Points
113
If they're only reporting weekly, why is there a daily # for cases? And why even the 1 death then? Are they reporting daily or not?

SD went to weekly reporting for awhile when #'s were low. But there was only data of any kind1 day per week. And since Florida is in a massive wave, it seems daily reporting might be prudent in any event?
I don’t claim to know the answers to questions about why and how they are reporting as they are. You’re the one claiming to know that Florida is underreporting…without any evidence other than looking at a chart that put an unusual number in for ONE DAY.

Like I said, if someone was going to conceal data, they wouldn’t report it as to bring attention to it. Like if Chicago was reporting murders and it went to 0 in one month. That would get more scrutiny, not less. Duh.
 


Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
Long lines for COVID tests in Floriday again today! @Go4Broke update coming next....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KGF







Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
  • Like
Reactions: KGF





PeoplesFront

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
580
Reaction score
613
Points
93
Parker Molloy is correct. Florida would have been in much better hands under the leadership of Gillum.


hotel%2Broom.jpg
 


Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
13,957
Reaction score
6,163
Points
113
At this point, everyone other than very young children have free access to vaccines. Open everything up and let the chips fall where they fall, with the stipulation that hospitals can reject anyone suffering from Covid if they cannot prove prior vaccination.

Send them home with a big bottle of ivermectin...🤣
 



TRF Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2019
Messages
1,586
Reaction score
790
Points
113
Re-living your Trump-Russia collusion days again. It was just so much fun until if was proven bullshit.
I wasn’t here then but I can imagine Howard was posting with his chest puffed out 😂
 


kg21

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
4,131
Reaction score
2,106
Points
113
I wasn’t here then but I can imagine Howard was posting with his chest puffed out 😂
Haven't you heard? Russian collusion still happened, even though it didn't happen.

Liberalism 101
 


howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
61,172
Reaction score
16,575
Points
113
Re-living your Trump-Russia collusion days again. It was just so much fun until if was proven bullshit.
So much lying.

Myth: Mueller found “no collusion.”

Response: Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.

While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

To find conspiracy, a prosecutor must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the crime: an agreement between at least two people, to commit a criminal offense and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.

 


KGF

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
22,522
Reaction score
4,294
Points
113
So much lying.

Myth: Mueller found “no collusion.”

Response: Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.

While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

To find conspiracy, a prosecutor must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the crime: an agreement between at least two people, to commit a criminal offense and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.

Time.com? Impressive.

And you make fun of My Pillow guy. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Geezus howie.

4A8F0882-6A78-43EA-9538-E97D89192EED.jpeg
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
Only if they have insurance. Otherwise a tube of apple flavored paste from Tractor Supply will do.
Can’t let this propaganda go either.
Ivermectin is only for horses. CNN said so. #SheepBeSheep
 
  • Like
Reactions: KGF

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
Re-living your Trump-Russia collusion days again. It was just so much fun until if was proven bullshit.
The Steele Dossier was fabricated, but everything was still true. Everything still makes sense then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KGF

KGF

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
22,522
Reaction score
4,294
Points
113
So much lying.

Myth: Mueller found “no collusion.”

Response: Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.

While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

To find conspiracy, a prosecutor must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the crime: an agreement between at least two people, to commit a criminal offense and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.

And if that was collusion, what was Hillary’s campaign paying people who paid Russians for BS narratives and phony information?
 

Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
7,794
Points
113
Only if they have insurance. Otherwise a tube of apple flavored paste from Tractor Supply will do.
Some might even find your ignorance refreshing.


Conclusions:​

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

 

KGF

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
22,522
Reaction score
4,294
Points
113




Top Bottom