SelectionSunday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 24,702
- Reaction score
- 4,848
- Points
- 113
Desmond Howard got me to thinking last night, specifically regarding ESPN's tired mantra/agenda.
As I was sitting there watching the NIU/Ball State game, listening to Howard doing color, saying, "No disrespect to the Big Ten teams that NIU has beaten, Iowa and Purdue, but this Ball State team is by far the best team they have played this year."
I think Howard was gagging as he read the bullet points from the mother ship (ESPN).
But those are exactly the wins the morons at ESPN are pointing to as to why NIU is ranked ahead of the likes of Michigan State and Wisconsin. So the wins are great if you're NIU, but trash if you're in the Big Ten?
Can't have it both ways, guys. If it's not a good win for a Big Ten team, why is it considered a notch in the belt for an NIU?
To be clear, I understand the Big Ten is nowhere near on par with the SEC and is behind the Pac 12, but it's ridiculous how much grief the Big Ten gets from the mother ship when you look at what the ACC and Big XII have to offer. I would argue at worst the Big Ten is the equal of both those conferences, especially the ACC, which is basically Florida State and Clemson and that's it. And has ESPN taken a look at the ACC's awful record in BCS games since the BCS came into being?
As I was sitting there watching the NIU/Ball State game, listening to Howard doing color, saying, "No disrespect to the Big Ten teams that NIU has beaten, Iowa and Purdue, but this Ball State team is by far the best team they have played this year."
I think Howard was gagging as he read the bullet points from the mother ship (ESPN).
But those are exactly the wins the morons at ESPN are pointing to as to why NIU is ranked ahead of the likes of Michigan State and Wisconsin. So the wins are great if you're NIU, but trash if you're in the Big Ten?
Can't have it both ways, guys. If it's not a good win for a Big Ten team, why is it considered a notch in the belt for an NIU?
To be clear, I understand the Big Ten is nowhere near on par with the SEC and is behind the Pac 12, but it's ridiculous how much grief the Big Ten gets from the mother ship when you look at what the ACC and Big XII have to offer. I would argue at worst the Big Ten is the equal of both those conferences, especially the ACC, which is basically Florida State and Clemson and that's it. And has ESPN taken a look at the ACC's awful record in BCS games since the BCS came into being?