Thanks, Southpaw, that's what I was thinking of. I understand your comments and probably agree with most if not all of them.
Part of me wants to say, "hey, no one has to buy the tickets.. if Minnesota feels they can sell them at price x and they actually do sell them, then I really shouldn't worry about the price or how it compares to what some other school is doing.. the market says it's a fair price".
As you mention, though... this season, despite proclaiming their nonconference home schedule to be "the toughest in the Big Ten", Minnesota had a double-digit attendance drop. I'm very curious to see how they price and promo single game tickets in 2012-13.
When I do the math (with some assumptions, because I do not know the dollars collected on premium seating that has existing prior to 2012-13), the seat pricing changes being implemented don't result in a huge increase in revenues for the U. Not at all.
I probably still go back to my free market thinking... but, what might rub me a little wrong is if there are really certain folks that can keep their seats, I just wish the U would be open & honest about it -- I think everything I've read has said that all sections are being reseated. If this is not accurate, then just tell em "except for members of the this or that club, or with some exceptions... etc."
Also, the goofy comparison page in the Spring 2012 brochure.. the Gophers example isn't consistent with the 2012-13 pricing and and it's strange they'd choose Nebraska as the one comparison.. first, Nebraska is new to the Big Ten.. isn't there a better comparison? second, Nebraska is moving to a brand spanking new arena in one year and has said, "it is the goal of the Athletic Department to not raise men's or women's basketball ticket prices in the immediate future."...
PS - not directly related & I'm sure it's been talked about here already, but the plan at the new Nebraska arena looks to include one sideline filled with student seating.. nice.