Do college coaches recruit more during the AAU season vs the high school season? I understand relationships are important but if one group of coaches wield more power is it best to spend more time with the AAU coaches or the high school coaches?
Will not happen. If the blame isn’t on Ben it will be placed on the U in some way. The club basketball Ben connection doesn’t completely compute with me. Ben is a straight arrow good guy and these clubs are influence peddlers who want coaches to bow down to them. Doesn’t make complete sense.So on a similar but somewhat different note...are others extremely anxious to see what happens to these high school AAU coaches when the high profile players continue to not come to the U?
They got the guy they wanted as head coach here. Can the blame for that trend finally be placed somewhere else besides the U basketball coach?
Edit: Can they please be under fire from the local media?
It's time that the media shift focus to those coaches as the reasoning. If Ben is their guy but their players won't play for him that's not a U problem or a Johnson problem.Will not happen. If the blame isn’t on Ben it will be placed on the U in some way. The club basketball Ben connection doesn’t completely compute with me. Ben is a straight arrow good guy and these clubs are influence peddlers who want coaches to bow down to them. Doesn’t make complete sense.
Yet Tyus Jones could only win one state title in his career? And that’s while playing with a great supporting cast.I saw Tyus Jones sleep walk to 35ish against Rosemount. Tyus could have scored 50ppg in high school. He chose not to. EYBL he was great but had to try to be great. Couldn’t just walk into the gym knowing the other team had no one who could possibly defend him.
You know AAU coaches don’t pick schools right? The kids do?So on a similar but somewhat different note...are others extremely anxious to see what happens to these high school AAU coaches when the high profile players continue to not come to the U?
They got the guy they wanted as head coach here. Can the blame for that trend finally be placed somewhere else besides the U basketball coach?
Edit: Can they please be under fire from the local media?
It's time that the media shift focus to those coaches as the reasoning. If Ben is their guy but their players won't play for him that's not a U problem or a Johnson problem.
I am sure he does. I think he just means that, wether correct or not, they are perceived to have a decent amount of influence on the player’s decision of where the play at the next level.You know AAU coaches don’t pick schools right? The kids do?
Even longer than that. I graduated HS in 2002, and by that time basketball recruiting was already being dominated by the AAU scene.It’s all club and it has been this way for 10-15 years.
Not at all. There are other great players. But some teams are very bad. On the Nike Aau circuit there aren’t bad teams. If a coach is going to evaluate a guy he is guaranteed to see him against good players in AAU instead of like a 25% chance in high school. Imagine flying from Texas to MN on a Tuesday, driving to Burnsville and seeing the kid you want to watch play 12 minutes?Yet Tyus Jones could only win one state title in his career? And that’s while playing with a great supporting cast.
You underrate high school basketball.
None of what you just said disagrees with anything I saidNot at all. There are other great players. But some teams are very bad. On the Nike Aau circuit there aren’t bad teams. If a coach is going to evaluate a guy he is guaranteed to see him against good players in AAU instead of like a 25% chance in high school. Imagine flying from Texas to MN on a Tuesday, driving to Burnsville and seeing the kid you want to watch play 12 minutes?
If you're flying from TX to MN on a Tuesday night to see a kid play, I'm sure you've seen plenty of film on him. How much are you going to rely on that one event's performance? I'd think that sort of trip is so the TX coach can be seen as putting forth the time and effort needed to land the kid.Not at all. There are other great players. But some teams are very bad. On the Nike Aau circuit there aren’t bad teams. If a coach is going to evaluate a guy he is guaranteed to see him against good players in AAU instead of like a 25% chance in high school. Imagine flying from Texas to MN on a Tuesday, driving to Burnsville and seeing the kid you want to watch play 12 minutes?
I wasn’t disagreeing? Sometimes you can have conversations while agreeing. I was pointing out that I wasn’t undervaluing high school basketball but it can make for tough recruiting because competition isn’t consistent. Is that ok if w3 agree?None of what you just said disagrees with anything I said
It may not be for evaluation but seems wasteful to watch him play 1/4 of the game.If you're flying from TX to MN on a Tuesday night to see a kid play, I'm sure you've seen plenty of film on him. How much are you going to rely on that one event's performance? I'd think that sort of trip is so the TX coach can be seen as putting forth the time and effort needed to land the kid.
You are undervaluing high school basketball when you said he could score 50 points per game in high school “if he wanted to”I wasn’t disagreeing? Sometimes you can have conversations while agreeing. I was pointing out that I wasn’t undervaluing high school basketball but it can make for tough recruiting because competition isn’t consistent. Is that ok if w3 agree?
50 was a stretch, my sincerest apologies. 30-35 in reasonable. Could have made hay against some really bad teams but didn’t. I’m sorry you’re so offended. I’m sure Johnson will hit the high school games hard and evaluate plenty of kids this spring at AAU games if allowedYou are undervaluing high school basketball when you said he could score 50 points per game in high school “if he wanted to”
that’s just flat out not true.
I guess it depends on what the intended outcome of the trip is in the first place. I wouldn't say it's wasteful if the coach still gets to interact with the player, and maybe even more importantly, the community and media get to see it so they can all say, "Wow, this coach must be all in on me/ ______ to make that kind of trip on a Tuesday!"It may not be for evaluation but seems wasteful to watch him play 1/4 of the game.
A lot of the time they can’t even talk to the player. Which is silly.I guess it depends on what the intended outcome of the trip is in the first place. I wouldn't say it's wasteful if the coach still gets to interact with the player, and maybe even more importantly, the community and media get to see it so they can all say, "Wow, this coach must be all in on me/ ______ to make that kind of trip on a Tuesday!"
Blaming aau/club is akin to blaming the barn for the poor performance. It’s the losing. End of storyI am sure he does. I think he just means that, wether correct or not, they are perceived to have a decent amount of influence on the player’s decision of where the play at the next level.
I’m just saying there is a lot of people speculating in here what is more important between AAU and high school basketball. And when people throw out that a guy could average 50 points per game if they wanted to in high school so that’s why coaches go to AAU games instead...it’s important for other people to know that’s not really true. And it’s why coach K (and dozens of other college coaches) went to multiple Apple Valley High School games.50 was a stretch, my sincerest apologies. 30-35 in reasonable. Could have made hay against some really bad teams but didn’t. I’m sorry you’re so offended. I’m sure Johnson will hit the high school games hard and evaluate plenty of kids this spring at AAU games if allowed
Of course I do, but why are the local coaches involved in this process? Coyle said in the presser that they consulted many of them.You know AAU coaches don’t pick schools right? The kids do?
I don’t have a lot of HS and AAU basketball contacts but the guys who do tell me Johnson is a real dude who has open and honest conversations of where they are at and kids take well to talking to him.Of course I do, but why are the local coaches involved in this process? Coyle said in the presser that they consulted many of them.
If kids continue to go to other schools than the problem is one of two things...
1. The coaches don't care at all about the U or who the coach is and are advising their players to play college elsewhere.
2. The coaches have no control over where the kids go (more obvious).
In either case we know where we stand having brought in a guy mainly to better recruit MN (Coyle's words). Moving forward we can look at hiring coaches who are winners and can close the book on putting all our chips in on MN kids.