Search results

Probably not many! But the groups could change from year to year If they don’t care about playing everyone your previous concern isn’t really validated True. The money will matter at some point. And at some point the money doesn’t want the best teams to have the middle records because they...

I don’t think it’ll ever go two divisions again. There’ll be groups. Maybe 4 groups and you fully play 2 including your own Maybe 6 groups and you play yours, another, and then random Grouping is also the way to get regular rotations of everyone playing everyone without a boondoggle of a...

If it morphs into auto bids the conference is going to want it so the best teams in the conference go to the playoff rather than the luckiest schedules going to the playoff The reasons the divisions went away was because it was routinely putting the 3-5th best team in the conference...

You don’t need divisions to have balanced scheduling Divisions are never coming back. But scheduling groups probably will in the next round of expansion to create more internal round robins

I don’t disagree. I think that Texas A&M and Missouri are the most realistic targets for the big ten. But Florida or Georgia would be interesting. If the SEC hadn’t added Texas and Oklahoma there is no doubt the big ten would’ve added Texas + one more

I suppose that one depends on who you credit the transitions backs to If kill gets the end of the careers of guys he recruited that played under fleck it’s close

No because he wanted it to sound like 12

Agree with all of this. Unless 2+ big names in portal and/OR big name teams in non conference home schedule…it will be (more) desolate next year

Agree LB was slightly better under Kill/Claeys DB was good under both Every other position probably better under fleck by at least a little Maybe TE was better under kill but that was one guy. Specialists I didn’t think about and don’t want to think about.

Man maybe if we didn’t put him in we would’ve struggled to score in OT…wait a minute

Didn’t watch postgame but did anyone ask BJ why he didn’t play Mitchell in OT

USt to the big east is insanely far away. Upside potential is them joining the Missouri valley in 4-6 years

Agree

Johnson had Rutgers -6.5 Only way to explain Mitchell not playing in OT

Possibly the dumbest thing in the history of basketball

Would’ve liked to have seen him possibly play in overtime

He did it again!

They’re going to start spending their NIL now that they’re eligible