Search results

Better to win ugly than to lose pretty (yes, I know there is another option but it wasn't available tonight)

Man, I think this has been a great game. If you think that's a ridiculous statement...

ME TOO! They need a TD, 2 timeouts, length of the field. This has to be nearly the best case scenario

Nope, you are very obstinate with this. Just look it up and be done with it

It should be a statement like this... When the down and distance is 3rd and 17, the likelihood of a first down is ____%.

Sure didn't

Not answering my question

What's the 3rd and 18 success rate again? I asked for it earlier, haven't seen it

Make UCLA make a mistake

In college it doesn't matter, it happened against Iowa too. As long as you have possession outside of the end zone you're good

If we get a 3 and out here we get the ball back around midfield with 2 minutes left. Only need a FG (which makes me throw up in my mouth a little bit)

Absolutely no one fooled on that screen

x100

Wut

About what? That wasn't on 3rd an17, was it?

Surely you've crunched the numbers to determine the success rate when teams do try for the first down and 3rd and 17. Please enlighten us as to what they are

So it's not impossible = it's guaranteed. Good to know

It happens all the time. We should design our offense to maximize our 3rd and 17 opportunities

I get it, but what are the odds of getting a first down on 3rd and 17? 4th and 7 is better than 4th and 17