Search results

This format is so unsatisfying, as a fan of sports.

Feels like a season that’s truly up for grabs.

Good wake up call for Indiana before a huge game against the Buckeyes. Let me know if you predicted Georgia losing by three scores

There’s always next, next year

Rutgers players made some outstanding key plays, Gopher players didn’t. The XP miss was foreshadowing. Taylor looks hurt/slow. He can catch, which is a good reason to keep trotting him out there. Brosmer had an off day but he was under immediate pressure. There is a ton of parity in CFB...

This game

Which generation can I blame for this

Absolutely amazing how he falls apart in second halves.

There it is

MN couldn’t run well against OSU after the injury. The rest of the year was strictly average on yards per rush, Fleck just ran a lot. Mo had a way of getting the tough yards the others couldn’t.

OK, yeah -assuming oddsmakers didn’t have inside knowledge or pre-cognition feelings of the situation - it greatly improves our odds. A healthy Monangai is a really good player/game changer. The line at -6 is interesting, regardless (I only make lunch bets, don’t follow this stuff)

Fair, but show me a coach that isn’t highly confident/arrogant. Genuinely can’t think of one at any level. A job requirement. He’s clearly an excellent communicator/coach with a GOAT track record.

Most concise summary of modeling utility I’ve seen. GIGO still a thing in 2024.

This greatly improves the odds for the good guys

I could listen to Saban on Gameday all day long. Iowa’s inability to run versus stop the run was something. They made UCLA look like a vintage Alabama defense. Bruins dominated TOP almost 38 minutes. As we saw at our game Garbers is pretty good. UCLA is a good story. Poor Iowa fans.

Grandmas forced to pay for ESPN by our favorite media/fun park/merch/cruise and hotel conglomerate🙄 Maybe somebody should look into that.

It would depend on the formula. Recruiting rankings, “strength of schedule”, height/weight, coach “it” factor, past performance, scoring margin, game control, or anything put out by Eastern Bloc mathematicians or statisticians are an automatic no/nyet. Win/loss, tiebreaker hierarchy...

The way FBS is currently set up makes it difficult in any totally objective way. If/when the P2 split away that allows a cleaner tournament free of the craziness in that Athletic article. If/when the players are allowed to collectively bargain that changes incentives on a longer season and...

Good Lord, that is nonsense. This is one area where the NFL is head and shoulders over CFB.

The rankings are compounding errors of circular logic on top of guesswork on top of groupthink. I guess they’re ok to argue about but…some teams play better by seasons end, some worse. The nice thing is this playoff system will not leave out as many worthy teams as before.