Search results

  1. Costa Rican Gopher

    Pre-dawn raid of Project Veritas

    Yes. If this is "well established", let's see the link proving this is true.
  2. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Cut 'n' paste the language that says it applies EXCEPT when hunting! This should be so simple. Post the damn stature number. Then cut 'n' paste the text backing your claim. You've spent post, fter post, refusing to do so. Just point to us where it says a 17 y/o can not be in possession of a a...
  3. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Your claim is that KR broke the following statute correct? "948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18." Where does it state the statute applies EXCEPT when hunting?
  4. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Which statute? Use the statute # please. Or, feel free to cut 'n' paste the actual language.
  5. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Edit: 29.304 refers only to people 16 y/o and under. KR was 17 y/o at the time of the shooting. I think we can agree KR was 17 y/o at the time of the shooting? That leaves only 29.593. 29.593 you claim KR broke refers specifically to hunting. KR was not hunting. Where's the violation?
  6. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Was that so hard? So you're claiming KR broke: 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. Now go to paragraph 3, section C: (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of...
  7. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    You're accusing him of breaking an unnamed law/statute, which I've asked you to clarify, and now you're asking me to clarify what he's accused of? Why don't you save us all some time, and just list the specific statute you claim he broke?
  8. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Ok, so no violation of 941.28 agreed?
  9. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    I asked you to list specifically which statute or law you claim he broke, and you would not do that. Instead you linked to lol...politifact. You claim via proxy that the specific statute KR broke was: "any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is...
  10. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Tangent. Stay on topic.
  11. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    941.28  Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle. (b) “Short-barreled rifle" means a rifle having one or more barrels having a length of less than 16 inches measured from closed breech or bolt face to muzzle or a rifle having an overall length of less than 26 inches. (c)...
  12. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18...
  13. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    I asked you specifically which law, or statute do you believe he broke? I'm really not interested in politifact, or wikipedia, but since you haven't read the statutes yourself, and appear to just be getting your info from politifact, I'll ask you to clarify politifact's position. They cite the...
  14. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Which law/statute specifically do you believe KR broke regarding him carrying the rifle? I'm reading through them right now. I was unaware until this morning that there is an exemption in Wisconsin for 16 & 17 y/o's to carry rifles and shotguns (but not hand guns).
  15. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    No doubt the allegation by Black will have to be looked into. Does Black have some sort of paper trail to prove this conversation and/or transaction actually happened?
  16. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    The strawman purchase would be on the man who purchased it, not on KR, so let's set that aside. That leaves carrying it as a minor. I'm reading the statutes on that right now (as you know there's plenty of debate), as Wisconsin allows exemptions for minors to carry a rifle or shotgun as long as...
  17. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    This was not a very impressive string by Rupar. We already knew KR wasn't a certified EMT. That's not a qualification though to provide medical assistance to people injured in a riot, and there's no law against lying to a journalist about it. KR stated, albeit clumsily, that the scene had...
  18. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    Admittedly KR was nervous, and it wasn't a good sequence for him. That said, it didn't prove anything, and he still hadn't broken any laws. Yes, the police had secured the scene, but they had secured the same scene, and then left it for the protesters to reclaim already once.
  19. Costa Rican Gopher

    Rittenhouse situation

    What illegal activity do you believe he was engaged in?



Top Bottom