So… your argument is that he isn’t a great coach because he’s the greatest talent evaluator of all time?
That’s what you’re saying if you think he has a roster full of 2 stars with more talent than rosters full of 4 and 5 stars.
As mentioned earlier, Indiana has 8 guys that were 4 star or higher. The other 3 teams have at least 40…
Indiana does not have the talent of the teams they’re playing but they are destroying them anyway.
Indiana is playing at a level that whole is greater than the sum of their parts. What...
There’s got to a significant amount of scouting into the mentality of each player too. Every player is dialed in and working his ass off for the success of the team. It doesn’t appear that anyone is chasing glory, they’re all just there to win.
I don’t think it makes Cignetti one of the greatest coaches ever but this is one of the greatest coaching jobs ever. Now if he is able to sustain this level…
The power of knowing exactly what you need to make your team good and getting players that have proven they have those qualities on a college football field.
They called it production or potential on the broadcast and makes all the sense in the world for the portal.
Are you saying that collection of talent is better than everyone else before Cignetti and staff even get to work?
That’s a wild take!
Their better than everyone else because the coaches have got the team to buy in and believe in themselves and their process.
Yes, moving Smith to a DT on obvious passing downs makes a ton of sense. The post I quoted seemed to insinuate doing that on a permanent basis which would not be a good idea.
One year contracts with a team option for another year with pay set by the previous years performance?
Somewhat like the baseball arbitration process.
A salary cap would be nice too but probably not realistic.