Search results

I agree Martin provided solid depth although its probably a wash between him and Schad who likely would have still been here if we didn’t take Martin.

Pinckney and Carter were pretty interchangeable and played both 3-tech and 1.

I'd be more excited about him than I was when Sergers or Jeffries committed.

Not only is Akers playing but he is playing well. Everyone's situation and body is different but that's a nice, new data point in favor of Mo.

Wow, that was pretty mild. Certainly no mega tongue.

He's listed at 6-2 on his Harvard page.

I went with B. it would be A if we got a more sure fire starter at DT and DE. I like Filiaga lot and the two CB’s. Carroll is solid and Jeffries and Surgers are a little meh.

What? He started very game for Michigan last year and 4 this year and has played in 30. This is a huge addition.

I think they'd probably like to have both.

I like the move not playing them, don’t validate them as a program.

Hayo was a 5 star on Scout.

We were 12th in yards per play which may be a better metric since our O dominates TOP and eats up so much clock shrinking the game.

He’s only going to be a second year player. Same with Shuster and Booker. We can get away with having 3 second year players on the two deep DL if we are content to win 8 or so games, have a pretty good D and finish 2nd or third in the west but if we want to be the clear favorites to win the...

I mean, HS film should not be a consideration when one is four years removed from it. What they did in HS means nothing now.

I hope we take a second DT transfer like Chris Smith. Jeffries is fine for a depth piece, but as a starter, I'd like someone a little better if we want to be the favorites to win the West.

He finished 11-2 with a top ten final ranking. I'd rather have that than a division title and that is taking the program to another level. It should be an A due to that season alone. I think if you told us that's what the record would be before we hired him, I think we'd all be ecstatic.

I don't hate the idea of Guedet starting, if it comes to that I think he'd probably do alright. But he is just the least proven of the potential starters. JMS is proven, Axel was a starter two years ago, Shaw was a two year starter and a quality one at that in the Mountain West and Ersery had...

I’d substitute Guedet for Shaw or maybe Boe it we’ll see. Agree with the rest.

He started 8 games for them.

Started 8 games at Vandy this year. Probably will start over Joiner and JLR opposite Rush I’d imagine so an upgrade over what we currently have which is always nice.