Search results

OSU and Michigan are balking.

On field success would be a very small part of the equation but only as it relates to viewer interest. The real question will be what schools will get the most viewers. Some might take that view. But there's a whole lot of fans of schools that would have never made a January 1 bowl game, the...

I believe Peej averages 8.5 if 2020 is tossed out.

Assuming we're funding a full 105 schollies then there is no such thing as a walk on.

Arizona will be in the Mountain West by then and Minnesota and Bama will both be in the new Super League of College Football brought to you by Dr. Pepper.

This is a correct combo

I don't know if this counts as the "oily sloganeering" that PJ has been accused of but it is the type of corporate motivational speaker type speak that really does him no favors, especially if the team falls on its face against New Jersey this week. More then anything, it's a product of the...

We gave up 27 to a team that got blanked by a MWC team. I don't think the verdict is in on this defense just yet.

My gut told me we were going to look good against Cal. My gut tells me this is a game we blow. If I go with the opposite of my gut, as I should, I'd say MN17-13NJ. But my gut really says: No DT+no pass catchers+no NJ defense vs. AK+KC+MN rushing 3+MN DBs not awesome: NJ31-16MN

Glen Taylor is the lead donor along with significant gifts from Adam Thielen and ISG Group (who is no doubt involved in the design and engineering). University link below. FB will temporarily be played at the track in '28 and in the new facility in '29. Long overdue...

Maybe in Jersey the intel on who will be available for Rutgers is pretty solid.

Somebody dualed up the ol' U-SJSU Streveler game plan.

TT seams to gave NIL $ and institutional support.

On Iowa's first offensive possession, Rutgers got away with a blatant PI, too. Our secondary might be better than Rutger's secondary, but what's more important is how their receivers match up with our secondary and vice versa. Rutgers has receivers. We don't. I thought AK looked night and day...

So your point is that we aren't better talent wise than 2/3rds of the conference but rather on par with the bulk of conference talent wise and then it comes down to coaching and execution. I'd say that's fair.

I see people on here refer to our talent level from time to time as a reason for optimism. I'm genuinely curious where the optimism comes from or is relative to? Is the talent level relative to last year? To other B1G teams? At what positions are we more often than not going to win...

If it isn't self evident (Stanford and Cal were spurned by the B1G and are now in the ACC) you can google and find plenty of commentary on the value, or lack thereof, in the Stanford and Cal programs, the hard on some here have for Stanford, particularly, notwithstanding. Hell, the ACC wasn't...

I wonder if the volume of portalling players will stay the same but be consolidated into the single portal window instaed of spread over two? I would guess a lotof guys that previously entered the spring window were already contemplating transferring but waited to see where they stood in...

Except that neither Stanford or Cal move the viewership needle in the Bay area, at least not enough to warrant a B1G invite. But there are probably plenty of UCLA and USC grads in the Bay Area.

What I don't understand about the NFL is why there is such a huge drop off from starting O-lineman to backups? How is this Skule on an NFL roster? And why does RIsner sit unsigned the last three years until the first week of the season? I don't know where he ended up this year but he was a...