Search results

I believe a few plays earlier said (57) perpetrator was carrying on similarly on a Mn d-lineman well behind and after the play. Just a little to jacked for the game.

College Stats should change sacks from negative rushing to negative passing yards. This would change the yards per attempt and completion to show actuality, and be more realistic. The college game used to be dominated by running QBs, no longer and the statistics should get with the times.

….but Coach needs to find some receivers who can get some separation, and beat someone deep. Been lacking for a number of years, IMHO.

Minnesota 27 Iowa 16

Iowa SMU Utah State Cincinnati

But we got corn fields out my way, lots of em!

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/b1g-time-overlook-p-j-fleck-and-minnesota-at-your-own-peril-its-even-worse-than-it-looks-at-wisconsin/

Wetjen ia a returner like Dejean, how do they find these guys.

I read some guy on espn said if not forthe horrible loss to Cal., they would be ranked in their top 25. Hard to believe that loss cost them 24 spots, they sit at 49. I believe Nebraska is 40, really?

Always lucky.

“Isn’t she lovely” Stevie Wonder song.

That Kingsbury play was classic football right there.

Minnesota continues domination of the Huskers with classic beat down.

I remember all the beatings of the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. This is fun.

This is the defensive line that was expected, at least by me.(maybe not 9 sacks, but pressure)

If we beat Iowa, for sure. If we don’t, it will be a struggle.

Minnesota 29 Nebraska 24

Lucky for you, you WILL be pleasantly surprised. Maybe I’ve just seen the mediocre parts of the Huskers, just not sold on the Ruhle, Raiola regime.

Minnesota Auburn LSU BYU

Purdue’s mistakes cost them the game. Minnesota capitalized and had less mistakes, definitely more fun to dominates stats and win, in my opinion. But I’d rather almost lose than almost win. Better than advertised: Purdue, Northwestern, UCLA, maybe Washington, and Indiana. Not as good as...