Search results

Girl, don't get me started.

Now where were we...

Oops-a-daisy.

There's something about the color and lighting at Arrowhead that's super harsh. These two teams in heavy red exacerbates it. It's hard to watch visually, bad FB notwithstanding.

Has to be the young QB

Win is a win. Can we get back to the NW laesuit settlement?

Our best red zone offense is to stay out of it

nifty

Good start for Drake. Rough finish.

It won't behind public now but depending on the status of litigation and discovery, it could have appeared in a court file. My point was this: If NW fired him for cause (no buyout), it's not a simple as NW later deciding it made a bad decision and deciding it was firing him without cause in...

Has anyone seen the actual contract? A lazy Google search turned up nothing for me. The devil in all of this would be in those details. Did the contract authorize NW to fire Fitz for any reason or no reason at all provided he was paid the specified buyout? But didn't NW fire him for cause...

Fitz likewise would have had a similar bill to pay his lawyers, the only certain winners in all of this. If the parties agreed on a settlement consisting of the full buyout plus the agreed upon released statements that were presented, each lost monetarily.

QB is a position where talented but not certain day one or two draft guys with eligibility remaining, especially G6/FCS guys, see a lot more upside to taking the route Brosmer or a guy like Mark Gronowski (South Dakota State and now at Iowa) took. A seven figure pay day and potentially improve...

He has to pay for the fake hunting show and hunting properties his brother operates.

I would think there would a reverse scenario. Max isn't going to the PS. He's the backup for an in game injury. Wentz will be PS until there's a need to bring him to the active roster.

It's not out of the realm of possibility that Wentz hits the practice squad.

In April - a routine litigation procedure that except in the most frivilous cases, is routinely denied. It didn't resolve the case.

There wasn't a ruling. It was a settlement.

Right. The statement that Fitz released was no doubt agreed to in negotiation. Fitz wanted to say loud and clear and unchallenged that he had no part or knowledge of the hazing. NW wanted an acknowledgment that hazing did in fact occur, even if Fitz is allowed to say it didn't occur, while not...

I think when it comes to college QBs, that really is how it works. Chances are very good that no matter the outcome at UTEP in 2025, he'll be on the move again.