Search results

I agree that rebuilding a bullpen is not easy, but in comparison to other areas, might be the easiest and also the most volatile from year to year. And after watching pretty much every game this year, I would say that the 13 game win streak was more flukish than the 38-57 record outside of that...

Give me Steven Richardson over Mario Reese. Richardson was an absolute plug in the middle.

Agreed. Even we give him credit for what he was defensively, a glove first SS, with limited power is not worth even a quarter of what he makes, so anyone who will take even some of that money off our books is a godsend.

Please God....

If you could really bet(and collect) against the GH diehards you would be a billionaire.

Seemed like a really good guy. RIP.

He's a complete unknown so not surprised that is where he is rated. Doesn't have a lot to do with where he ends up, but all we have is hope to go on right now.

Sorry didn’t mean to interrupt up the silly nose in the air circle J.

There are parts of MPLS that have the high sophistication you speak of, but before we crown ourselves the cultural jewel of the Midwest, you can also just as easily see a guy taking a dump on 1st Avenue or borderline OD’ing on the light rail.

When the program fires your best buddy, I guess it probably takes away some of the fun.

Paddack and Pagan for Rogers and Rooker(should have been AS last year) was a real stinker. Holding out hope for Gonzalez but essentially no value for Polanco as of yet. I’d say Berrios return was okay. Cano for Lopez was not a win and Cano became an alll star like you asked about. I’d say a...

I don't see it. I was kind of surprised he got drafted.

If you get rid of collegiate sports leaving just second rate professional sports that pretend d they have some affiliation with the U, a lot of people will just be done with the revenue sports sports.

This makes more sense now

I wonder what his motivation was? Maybe some beef with his own team. Long time buddies with McCown? Weird.

To me the action of deliberately sabotaging your own team is much worse than cheating to gain an extra advantage for your own team to win. Not that either makes the other okay, which is why I didn't get why the two were interrelated.

What does this have to do with Michigan?

Purdue(The DB's home this year) and the conference said there is really nothing here?!?!? How could that be nothing. He is deliberately handing over information to help the other team. How could this be interpreted as nothing?

Why does it have to be either?

I agree. At this point, deal em both.