Search results

Some buzz is UCLA might be the landing spot for a lot less, and he’d compete with a transfer from App st.

I don’t think that’s true. Teams are happy to have players develop, now they don’t want a kid just warming the bench for 4-5 years, but if they can develop into a starter or significant player as an upper classman that’s fine. A lot of players don’t have the patience for that though.

That and basically refusing to run the ball.

It’s pretty hard to argue that the players don’t have enough rights at this point and that the impact of being an athlete isn’t compensated well enough.

I don’t think anyone would want contact with the starting qbs allowed in a preseason game.

Yeah that would be interesting to know. Does the HC have to sign off on all offers? Does he let some coaches have more freedom with that?

You’re going to have to replace way more if they all can enter with no threat of consequences. Plus you’ll end up with way more competing offers to deal with. It’s not being a jerk, it’s the only power the schools still have. If it was how you want it you’d have over 1,000 players just from...

If you enter the portal your scholarship is only protected for the current term. After that the school can yank it if they choose to, even if the player wants to stay. If it was protected why wouldn’t every player enter it every year to see what offers are available?

They definitely don’t have to let the player come back, that’s why you see so many enter and end up worse off or without any offers.

What’s with all the posts about interest dwindling just now? This stuff started years ago.

Since when is there an option to come back that is controlled by the player?

Well I assume that wouldn’t be Iowa either at least.

I can’t remember the last time we got a sophomore commitment prior to their junior year. I remember we got an Illinois rb to commit pretty early maybe during the Brewster era? I don’t remember the name or what ended up happening with him, don’t think he ended up signing anywhere if I recall.

I don’t see how you can replace Perich there.

Maybe my memory isn’t great, but I don’t recall him giving up a lot of chunk plays or committing a lot of penalties. Maybe by nfl draftee standards?

Interesting to see Witke at #2. He does have an extra year in the system compared to Pyron.

Just saying plenty of people don’t like him and it has nothing to do with jealousy. If I was a Colorado fan I would be glad to be winning some games after a poor stretch, but I still wouldn’t be a fan of Sanders.

Who and how many transfer is what I was referring too. Yes obviously everyone has transfers…

I think Bowden, Bryan, and Kelly will be a very solid foundation. Since they only took one cb in the portal I’m guessing they must have confidence in what they’ve seen after a year with the redshirt freshmen group of Madu, Gerald, and Seidl.

Didn’t say fans were upset, I said I’m sure they don’t all love him. Which should be obvious if you spend time on here and see different fans feelings towards Fleck. As for the players, it’s a carousel of transfers.