2026 Rules Changes

Unregistered User

Wild animal with a keyboard
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
17,897
Reaction score
9,769
Points
113

Players would not have to miss the first half of the next game on a first offense

For the 2026 season, the Division I Football Bowl Subdivision Oversight Committee on Thursday approved a one-year trial rule to modify the penalty structure when players are penalized for targeting.

Under the rule, a player disqualified for targeting for the first time during the season, regardless of which half it occurs, may participate in the next game.

Any player disqualified for targeting a second time during the season will be required to miss the first half of the next game. If a player is disqualified for a third targeting penalty during the season, the player will be required to miss the entire next game. No players were disqualified for targeting three times in the 2025 season.

A conference has the option to initiate an appeals process after a player’s second targeting offense. The appeal, which can cover the first and second targeting offenses, would be sent to the NCAA national coordinator of football officials, who would then facilitate a video review.

If the call is overturned on appeal, the player will be able to play without sitting out the first half of the next game.

Previously, players disqualified for targeting would be disqualified for the remainder of that game, and if the foul occurred in the second half, the player would sit the first half of the next game.

Since the 2022 season, conference offices have been allowed to appeal second-half targeting disqualifications to the NCAA national coordinator of officials in hopes of having the call overturned so the player would not have to miss the first half of the next game.

Fair catch kick​

Under another rule approved Thursday by the oversight committee, a team can choose to attempt a kick after a completed or awarded fair catch. The kick will be a field goal place kick with a holder (no tee) or a drop kick from the spot where the returner caught the ball.

If the ensuing kick goes through the uprights, it will add 3 points to that team’s total. The defense is required to be at least 10 yards from the spot of the kick.

This rule further aligns Division I with similar rules that exist in NFL and high school football.

Other rule changes approved​

  • On punts where jersey number exceptions (players who do not wear numbers 50-79) are used, the snapper and two adjacent linemen on either side who are lined up in (or touching) the tackle box are ineligible receivers by position and become exceptions to the numbering rule when the snapper takes his position. This clarifies which players are eligible receivers in the formation.
  • While the Division I Football Rules Subcommittee is comfortable with the administration of unsportsmanlike conduct penalties, the oversight committee approved clarifying the rule to give on-field officials guidance to align with the current game. Officials will focus on unsportsmanlike conduct where a player taunts an opponent; actions that interfere with game administration; and celebrations found demeaning to the game or opponent.
  • Offensive pass interference penalties will be 10 yards. Previously, the penalty for offensive pass interference was 15 yards.

Uniforms​

The oversight committee did not approve a proposal that would have required players to wear leg coverings from the top of their shoes to the bottom of their pants.
 

Wish they'd change the "if your knee touches you're down" rule, especially for kickoff and punt returns.

Also, IMO offensive holding should be a 5-yard penalty vs. 10 yards. It's such a subjective call, and 10 yards is just too much of a drive killer.

I'm glad that unlike the NFL, in college you can still tackle the QB.
 

I’m honestly surprised some teams with great defenses and bad offenses don’t use the fair catch kick more often.

Uncontested FG on first down, miss ball goes to 20 (or 25, unsure what touchback rule says)
Make it, 3 points and kickoff.

Iowa could win a game 15-0 without ever running an offensive play
 

Wish they'd change the "if your knee touches you're down" rule, especially for kickoff and punt returns.

Also, IMO offensive holding should be a 5-yard penalty vs. 10 yards. It's such a subjective call, and 10 yards is just too much of a drive killer.

I'm glad that unlike the NFL, in college you can still tackle the QB.
I know I'm probably in the minority on this, but I don't care for the NFL rule of needing to be touched to be down. If you don't want to be ruled down, stay on your feet.
 



I know I'm probably in the minority on this, but I don't care for the NFL rule of needing to be touched to be down. If you don't want to be ruled down, stay on your feet.
For me the biggest problem I have with the knee issue is on punt and kickoff returns, where the returner may drop to a knee to complete the catch and no one from the kicking team is anywhere near them. It doesn't happen a lot, but I don't like it when it does. Let 'em try to return the ball.
 

Another rule I'd like to see changed is that when a fumbled football goes out of the end zone, it's considered a turnover and the other team gets the ball.
 

For me the biggest problem I have with the knee issue is on punt and kickoff returns, where the returner may drop to a knee to complete the catch and no one from the kicking team is anywhere near them. It doesn't happen a lot, but I don't like it when it does. Let 'em try to return the ball.
I'd like to see it treated like they treat it for the holder on a FG or PAT. Clearly the knee is down, but there is an exception for that. They could waive it off if it's in the act of catching a kicked ball. Easy fix.
 

For me the biggest problem I have with the knee issue is on punt and kickoff returns, where the returner may drop to a knee to complete the catch and no one from the kicking team is anywhere near them. It doesn't happen a lot, but I don't like it when it does. Let 'em try to return the ball.
I think that would be a good exception to the rule like the holder on extra points and field goals.
 



Another rule I'd like to see changed is that when a fumbled football goes out of the end zone, it's considered a turnover and the other team gets the ball.
So, what is the result of a ball fumbled through the end zone? Do over? Ball at the 1?

Personally, I don't have a problem with that rule, but would love to hear other options, and can be swayed if it would make sense or increase fairness.
 

Another rule I'd like to see changed is that when a fumbled football goes out of the end zone, it's considered a turnover and the other team gets the ball.
What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurred?
 

What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurred?
That seems fair.
 

What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurred?
Why not just eliminate the turnover rule and treat it like a fumble between the goal lines out of bounds? Ball is brought back to the point of fumble - ball can't be advanced by a fumble. That would leave as the only turnover exception a fumble out of the back of your own end zone (resulting in a safety).
 



What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurred?
If the fumble occurs before November 14th, 2026, the starting QB from the fumbling team "gets" to give @The Deliberate Stranger a hand job, but they get the ball at the point the fumble occurred.

But we'll have to change the circumstances for November 15th, 2026 and beyond
 

What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurred?
Move it back to the point of the fumble. You can't advance a fumble; make it apply in this case as well.
 

Another rule I'd like to see changed is that when a fumbled football goes out of the end zone, it's considered a turnover and the other team gets the ball.
I was thinking the exact opposite. A fumble out of bounds anywhere on the field results in a turnover. If you have possession, and want to retain possession, either hang on to the ball or get it back before it goes out.
 

I was thinking the exact opposite. A fumble out of bounds anywhere on the field results in a turnover. If you have possession, and want to retain possession, either hang on to the ball or get it back before it goes out.
If memory serves me right, in Canadian football whoever last touched a fumbled ball before it goes out of bounds gets possession.
 

What would you change it to? Go back to where the fumble occurred? I agree the rule should be changed in some way but also think the fumbling team should have some kind of consequence. Maybe move it back 5 yards from where the fumble occurr

I was thinking the exact opposite. A fumble out of bounds anywhere on the field results in a turnover. If you have possession, and want to retain possession, either hang on to the ball or get it back before it goes out.
How about a jump ball?
 


If memory serves me right, in Canadian football whoever last touched a fumbled ball before it goes out of bounds gets possession.
If so, I don't hate that rule. Puts a premium for both teams on actually securing and recovering the ball, and doesn't give the offense the safety of the sideline on a loose ball.
 

Why not just eliminate the turnover rule and treat it like a fumble between the goal lines out of bounds? Ball is brought back to the point of fumble - ball can't be advanced by a fumble. That would leave as the only turnover exception a fumble out of the back of your own end zone (resulting in a safety).
I think you should retain possession but if you fumble out the back of the endzone you’re trying to score in you go back to your own 20 and loss of down.

2nd and goal from your own 20
 

I thought the fair catch rule in the NFL had limitations. Something like only when the fair catch was the last play of the quarter the receiving team got one free kick for goal. Am I wrong? Seems silly to take a free kick for goal in the middle of a quarter
 

re the fumble out of the end zone
Pros: encourages play to the whistle (even if you may not get guy down, can knock ball out), if ball is out back of end zone, why should defender be restricted on recovering a play they forced?
Cons: aggressively punitive (no where else on the field is it a turnover)
To me, I think if it goes out of the back of the end zone, i'd call it a turnover (you are clearly not in possession). Goes out on the sidelines (i.e. you're jumping to break the pylon), then returns to the spot of the fumble. Allows you to reward the runner trying to make the spectacular play, but also allows defenders to try make a play at the goal line (think chase down) while not being aggressively punitive for what typically are your bang bang plays (the one at the pylon) as the one's out of the back of the end zone the ball is typically waaaaay gone from the ball carrier

We have enough cameras to make this work, and if it is not easy to tell, it stays with the offense.
 

I think you should retain possession but if you fumble out the back of the endzone you’re trying to score in you go back to your own 20 and loss of down.

2nd and goal from your own 20
think the 10 would be better in the college game given most teams don't have the passing game to be remotely threatening enough when you need 20 in 2 downs
 

I thought the fair catch rule in the NFL had limitations. Something like only when the fair catch was the last play of the quarter the receiving team got one free kick for goal. Am I wrong? Seems silly to take a free kick for goal in the middle of a quarter
there is no restriction on timing per the NFL rulebook, but would not make sense to attempt the kick unless there's 5 seconds or less on the clock in most circumstances (that is the maximum amount of time that can come off unless there is a return) given if you miss, the other team gets the ball immediately and could try a FG as well and by trying a free kick, you're giving up the opportunity to gain yards/score a TD.

Would be interesting in college for teams with a very good kicker late in a half (say like 30 seconds) given offenses often struggle in 2 minute drills and you get to eliminate having a rush come at you on an attempt from say the 45-55 yards
 


there is no restriction on timing per the NFL rulebook, but would not make sense to attempt the kick unless there's 5 seconds or less on the clock in most circumstances (that is the maximum amount of time that can come off unless there is a return) given if you miss, the other team gets the ball immediately and could try a FG as well and by trying a free kick, you're giving up the opportunity to gain yards/score a TD.

Would be interesting in college for teams with a very good kicker late in a half (say like 30 seconds) given offenses often struggle in 2 minute drills and you get to eliminate having a rush come at you on an attempt from say the 45-55 yards
In the college game I believe it is less risky because it’s a “free kick” not a field goal

So the ball doesn’t go to other team where you kicked from, it would be covered and fielded like a kickoff. Likely a touchback
 

In the college game I believe it is less risky because it’s a “free kick” not a field goal

So the ball doesn’t go to other team where you kicked from, it would be covered and fielded like a kickoff. Likely a touchback
really really good point
 




Top Bottom