Unregistered User
Wild animal with a keyboard
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 16,976
- Reaction score
- 8,268
- Points
- 113
OK edgelordAt least I'm honest. I'm fairly impressed at how many others here are honest as well.
OK edgelordAt least I'm honest. I'm fairly impressed at how many others here are honest as well.
Nonsense.This idea that someone cannot consent because of various power dynamics is nonsense.
I agree its wrong. No idea in this case who started it or whatever happened, but it obviously did not end well. And in my opinion I have no idea why anyone would think this is a good idea.Nonsense.
I doubt there's an organization in the western world that doesn't prohibit supervisor/subordinate relationships. Because the subordinate might not have the power to not consent.
It's clearly wrong.
While I would like to believe that I have higher standards for myself and my team, the truth is that the Gophers winning a natty would almost certainly kill me, so I wouldn't ever have to deal with the fallout. So I say yes.If instead of the Wolverines, it would have been the Gophers who won the national title in 2023, in addition to having won three consecutive B1G titles in that time?
NGL, I think I would be fine with it.
FIFYI don't remember roughly how many she did, but it was FAR more than a couple papers. Haskins screwed up big time. Kidsarewere here to get an education. Think the parents like that for the most part?
No. The basketball team has undergone almost three decades of futility after the Gangelgate scandal and subsequent sanctions. It has practically destroyed my interest in that sport. There are only a very small handful of programs in football and basketball that have the political power to overcome major scandal. MN is not one of them.
Silly. Gangelgate isn't responsible for decades long futility. It's an ongoing incompetent/non caring admin. Sadly, that will never change in Minnesota
Anyone "voting" no on this topic is a liar or a fool
Anyone "voting" no on this topic is a liar or a fool
What he said.Not a liar and not a fool, so fuck off.
I do wonder what the population of UMN grads are on this board. I suspect the serious variation in this question would correlate highly between people who graduated and those who like this program because it’s the biggest cfb program in the state.That’s a stupid thing to say and insulting to the people of integrity here who take pride in The University, and that is not a lie.
But, I do respect you and your views on this board. And that is a lie.
Not a liar and not a fool, so fuck off.
That's certainly a take.Silly. Gangelgate isn't responsible for decades long futility. It's an ongoing incompetent/non caring admin. Sadly, that will never change in Minnesota
Anyone "voting" no on this topic is a liar or a fool
100% it's wrong. I never said it wasn't wrong. I saying it has no impact on consent.Nonsense.
I doubt there's an organization in the western world that doesn't prohibit supervisor/subordinate relationships. Because the subordinate might not have the power to not consent.
It's clearly wrong.
Good grief. Definitely not surprised by your response, though.Silly. Gangelgate isn't responsible for decades long futility. It's an ongoing incompetent/non caring admin. Sadly, that will never change in Minnesota
Anyone "voting" no on this topic is a liar or a fool
Good grief. Definitely not surprised by your response, though.
My, my. Thin skinned, you are.Stupid. Nothing to add like most of your 17.5k posts; but thanks for playing
Monopolies, oligarchs, and corrupt leadership is the US baseline today. Sad that people think that is the way forward even for our state beacon of higher education.
At least I'm honest. I'm fairly impressed at how many others here are honest as well.
I always wonder if the same posters that condone cheating/winning-at-all-costs also encourage their kids to cheat in school? Cheat on their boyfriends, girlfriends, spouses? Or if they coach youth sports do they cheat there too? Embezzle funds from their employer?The human brain is an incredible engine of rationalization of ends justifying the means. I’d wager there is high correlation between the “yes” posters” here with strident right or left political leanings. It’s tempting to see cheaters getting rewarded (like Michigan, or UNC, or XYZ or in business or life in general)) and just give up on trying to adhere to rules and code of conduct, ethics, morals. I see it in family and friends and it’s astonishing but nothing new in human behavior or history.
The OP:
As I said.
I think at our base level, all people are good (sans people with debilitating mental illneses such as socio/psychopathy). Then circumstances or poor guidance/upbringing turn them into shittier versions of themselves, and that perpetuates generationally unless an outside factor enters and stops the cycle. It's why you see chronic domestic assault, for instance, occurring among certain families and not others. If you grow up seeing it, that's the norm/acceptable.I always wonder if the same posters that condone cheating/winning-at-all-costs also encourage their kids to cheat in school? Cheat on their boyfriends, girlfriends, spouses? Or if they coach youth sports do they cheat there too? Embezzle funds from their employer?
It is 1) Moore’s association with Stallions and Harbaugh and the associated recruiting and play stealing, and 2) the pattern of lack of institutional control that kept him and others in their roles when they should’ve been out. If UM had stricter self oversight and swifter disciplinary action (I’m not only talking about Moore’s affair), maybe they wouldn’t have won as much as they did. It doesn’t matter whether the scandal has to do with on field play. If it keeps coaches or players on the field when they shouldn’t be, then the wins could be undeserved.The current Michigan situation isn't "cheating" in the way stealing opponants' play calls is.
Or for that matter, the way Ganglegate was.
Moore cheated his family, and displayed zero integrity, but he didn't "cheat" the competition.