Geers interception play in front of sudeline judge?

I think generally it's just incompetence, not bias. I do think there is an element though when we play an OSU, etc that human nature enters their mind about what is "supposed to happen".
OR a Michigan, when there really wasn't an offside on the kickoff, which allowed them to keep the ball and win by 3... is that the 'element' you're thinking about?
 



Can't set a pick, just flat run into a guy , just bounce off like that in the NCAA, just like receivers can't set picks or a basketball player cannot undercut a player landing. I know it used to be legal, and in NFL still is, but in rule books now that play would be considered illegal contact. I know they allow contact but not at a defender just cutting off WR across and blasting the route like that. Once they started calling the pick plays on offense as offensive pass interference they changed the rule on illegal contact under 5 yards. It's a nuance and easy for the referees to miss.You are right that this was once considered legal in HS and College. You would see ot on every screen or drag play if it were still legal.
Thanks.

In that case Fleck should be livid because Geers could’ve been injured.
 

Am I the only one that thinks yesterday's Big 10 crew is bias against the Gophers? Isn't that Geers play covered by Article 2 Illegal contact within 5 yards rule by NCAA or HS. NFL has a different rule but in college when a guy is even with you, under 5 yards, you cannot grab, blast or hold at that point. The Buffalo linebacker just flat out ran straight into Geers knocking him over. For those listening on the radio, did the radio guys call this play out. I was at the game and I noticed contact but didn't think referee or side judge saw it. I don't think you can hit a guy like that once the offensive player and defender are to the same spit or hash mark. Once your even you can't grab or hit a dude otherwise every defender in College football would do it. I mean Iowa teaches grab ass and clutching all over the field and they get away with it. I thought the Geers play the side judge wasn't even looking and it happened in front of him. I thought on # 8 the Smith over ruled catch there was illegal contact to head and kneck area with that blow to the head on a defensive back, if not targeting it was a personal foul illegal contact to a defenseless receiver. I know these referees overlap with calling a lot of games, but that Big 10 crew with yesterday's head referee seems to always be involved in controversial calls when it comes to fouls comitted against the Gophers. It wasn't obvious but the Buffal defender committed either illegal contact or Holding against Geers. That play is a foul in College it's not the same rule as the NFL. A lot of NFL people would say no foul or penalty, but in college that play is a penalty by the definition in the rule book. I thought yesterday's crew had some bad misses, refs have a tough job but they didn't give Gophers the Big 10 treatment you usually see of a home team. Can someone post the footage if they have it of the play? Disagree if you want but I thought live that play was fishy and wrong.
I thought there was questionable contact to the head neck area of Taylor on many of his carries. This obviously in addition to what you mentioned.

I questioned how #36? shoved/ threw Geers on the play in question. Glad our team responds and doesn't let that stuff get to them.
 


At Fleck's press conference last night, he said it was a legal play. Perhaps he thinks differently now after seeing it today.
 

As the play developed, I presumed Drake threw the ball at Geers to emphasize that his receiver got taken out before he could even be in a position to catch the pass and was trying to help draw a penalty. Just a bizarre result
Re-watching on DVR I think Lindsey saw Geers open and separated from the defender thus quickly checked down it him. He didn't realize that the separation was because Geers was blasted a couple of yards backwards and losing his balance to the ground when he was releasing the ball.
 

Re-watching on DVR I think Lindsey saw Geers open and separated from the defender thus quickly checked down it him. He didn't realize that the separation was because Geers was blasted a couple of yards backwards and losing his balance to the ground when he was releasing the ball.
I think it was just young QB jitters. I played the position and sometimes your check downs are just instinct and you throw without looking. It's muscle memory due to the thousands of reps you throw in practice.
 

I think it was just young QB jitters. I played the position and sometimes your check downs are just instinct and you throw without looking. It's muscle memory due to the thousands of reps you throw in practice.
I didn’t see many “jitters”. A game is just faster than practice. The Cal game will tell us a lot.
 



I don’t know the college rule but that’s absolutely legal in high school
 


Seems like a great strategy then. Used often in high school?
A high school coach directs guys to be physical before the ball is in the air
You can’t grab, that’s holding, but a push happens. Especially on crossers LBs will give them shots

Your strategy can’t be just light them up though. Because if you swing and miss they’re wide open
 




Top Bottom