Students paying students: How the U is trying to stay competitive in athletics

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
63,210
Reaction score
20,971
Points
113
Per STrib:

University of Minnesota students will pay a new $200 athletics fee this year even if they never don a Gophers football helmet or attend a single game.

The Twin Cities campus for the first time has added a $100-per-semester fee to offset the substantial price tag for paying student athletes to play on Gophers teams. Even so, the athletics budget is $8.75 million short, though U officials said they’re hopeful they can close the gap.

The new fees are drawing ire from student government leaders and come at the same time as a significant tuition increase of 6.5% for in-state undergraduates and 7.5% increase for out-of-state undergraduates there this fall.

Riley Hetland and Ethan Fiegel, the president and vice president of the U’s Undergraduate Student Government, said in a statement that “while we acknowledge that student-athletes deserve fair compensation for the amazing work they do, Gopher Athletics already generates revenue from students through voluntary contributions in the form of tickets and merchandise sales.”

“Students should not be forced to pay an additional fee on top of this,” they said.

Mark Coyle, the U’s athletic director, said in an interview this week that the fee is not uncommon among other institutions and helps maintain athletic facilities used by the student body.

Paying student athletes the full $20.5 million will make up 12% of the U’s $174.2 million athletic budget for 2026, more than the cost of scholarships, maintaining facilities or paying down debt. The nearly $9 million shortfall is after the new student fees are accounted for; they are expected to bring in $7 million, U officials said.


Go Gophers!!
 

This is so incredibly wrong! Tuition-paying students should not have to pay for athletes. Not every school is doing this, e.g, University of Wisconsin

1. Raise ticket/user fees on tickets.
2. Get more sponsors.
3. Get more concerts.
4. Get more NIL.
5. Get a more creative athletic director.

The Board of Regents should reverse this decision.
 

In other words this is 1% of tuition for instate students and .5% for out of state students per year.
 

Per STrib:

University of Minnesota students will pay a new $200 athletics fee this year even if they never don a Gophers football helmet or attend a single game.

The Twin Cities campus for the first time has added a $100-per-semester fee to offset the substantial price tag for paying student athletes to play on Gophers teams. Even so, the athletics budget is $8.75 million short, though U officials said they’re hopeful they can close the gap.

The new fees are drawing ire from student government leaders and come at the same time as a significant tuition increase of 6.5% for in-state undergraduates and 7.5% increase for out-of-state undergraduates there this fall.

Riley Hetland and Ethan Fiegel, the president and vice president of the U’s Undergraduate Student Government, said in a statement that “while we acknowledge that student-athletes deserve fair compensation for the amazing work they do, Gopher Athletics already generates revenue from students through voluntary contributions in the form of tickets and merchandise sales.”

“Students should not be forced to pay an additional fee on top of this,” they said.

Mark Coyle, the U’s athletic director, said in an interview this week that the fee is not uncommon among other institutions and helps maintain athletic facilities used by the student body.

Paying student athletes the full $20.5 million will make up 12% of the U’s $174.2 million athletic budget for 2026, more than the cost of scholarships, maintaining facilities or paying down debt. The nearly $9 million shortfall is after the new student fees are accounted for; they are expected to bring in $7 million, U officials said.


Go Gophers!!

Was your Thread Title a George Costanza call back to The Human Fund?
 



I feel like this is basically wrong.
It is wrong.

NCAA college football is nearly as lucrative as every sports league outside of the NFL with a fraction of the costs while operating as a supposed "non-profit". If they can't find the money in the immense amount of revenue flowing into these schools then i'd love to see where all the money is going.

The world has decided these are professional leagues. Pay the players in the sports that bring in money and don't pay the rest. I love football but it feels morally wrong to make some kid who just wants to study engineering pay for our hobby.
 

It is wrong.

NCAA college football is nearly as lucrative as every sports league outside of the NFL with a fraction of the costs while operating as a supposed "non-profit". If they can't find the money in the immense amount of revenue flowing into these schools then i'd love to see where all the money is going.

The world has decided these are professional leagues. Pay the players in the sports that bring in money and don't pay the rest. I love football but it feels morally wrong to make some kid who just wants to study engineering pay for our hobby.
I agree with everything except how lucrative NCAA football is painted out to be. Some schools yes, but most no. And maybe they could be more lucrative as the point was never to make money before, but it is now.

But I'll admit, I have followed the Gophs since I was a kid and watch a copious amount of college football, but if it is second tier professional sports, I'll pass. The NFL offers a better product and has measures in place for parity and continuity. And outside of superfan forums like this, many, many people feel the same way. The cash cow, whether real or not, is in real jeopardy...
 

It is wrong.

NCAA college football is nearly as lucrative as every sports league outside of the NFL with a fraction of the costs while operating as a supposed "non-profit". If they can't find the money in the immense amount of revenue flowing into these schools then i'd love to see where all the money is going.

The world has decided these are professional leagues. Pay the players in the sports that bring in money and don't pay the rest. I love football but it feels morally wrong to make some kid who just wants to study engineering pay for our hobby.
If you get rid of all of the sports sucking up the money made by the football team, then the $200 fee might go away
 

Get rid of every sport not carrying its weight. Or, cut it down to the ones Coyle has publicly stated the U is going to divvy up to pay (FB, MBB, MHOC, VB, WBB).

That's where this has all been headed for a long time, even before NIL & paying players (legally) came into play. So just cut the cord now and be done with it. If the other sports want to stay on as a Division 1 program, raise your own funds. Football, men's basketball, and men's hockey have been carrying the freight forever.
 
Last edited:



It is wrong.

NCAA college football is nearly as lucrative as every sports league outside of the NFL with a fraction of the costs while operating as a supposed "non-profit". If they can't find the money in the immense amount of revenue flowing into these schools then i'd love to see where all the money is going.

The world has decided these are professional leagues. Pay the players in the sports that bring in money and don't pay the rest. I love football but it feels morally wrong to make some kid who just wants to study engineering pay for our hobby.
When this "paying players" thing first hit, my immediate prediction was that it was just going to become another in a series of money pits for fans...which it did. But at least fans have the choice whether to opt in or not. Students are involuntary captives to the leeching.
 
Last edited:

Get rid of every sport not carrying its weight. Or, cut it down to the ones Coyle has publicly stated the U is going divvy up to pay (FB, MBB, MHOC, VB, WBB).

That's where this has all been headed for a long time, even before NIL & paying players (legally) came into play. So just cut the cord now and be done with it. If the other sports want to stay on as a Division 1 program, raise your own funds. Football, men's basketball, and men's hockey have been carrying the freight forever.
I understand the sentiment, but to compete in FBS, a school must compete in at least 16 varsity sports, including football.

Everything else is changing, so maybe this will too.
 

I love when people say "other sports should carry their own weight" like the sports are choosing how they are attended and perceived :rolleyes:

Sorry but I have no interest in schools ignoring non-revenue sports. Guess what hockey won't be profitable either when half the schools drop it for not making money.

Then again im old enough to remember making fun of Wisconsin for cutting baseball...
 




Top Bottom