While technically true, if you compare where he went to high school to where he'll be playing next year, most people wouldn't feel like they're in the same state. I mean, this was the description of one of the events before one of their home games last year:
Not much in common with the...
Didn't know that, thanks. Maybe it's just me, but Senior Female would come off better. Senior Woman just came off as old fashioned and rude, and I think that's why I thought it was a mistake.
I gotta agree. From 2025 and 2026 on the list you have, I only recognized one name, and that's because the guy went to Michigan and people kept mentioning his $12M or whatever.
I used to follow high school recruiting way more and I knew the top players at almost all positions. Your post made...
Yeah, I bet the thought process went about like this, "lemme think of another team that hasn't had a lot of success and had plenty of down years like Indiana", then he identifies us and thinks, "well, QB is the most important position on the field so if they get one they can turn things around"...
Not sure I've ever heard the title "Senior Woman Administrator". I think I know what he meant, but man....
That being said, the article makes the home games seem like a real cool experience.
Either way, QB isn't the limiting factor like ol' Bundy claimed. None of the Heisman finalists would have gotten us to the CFP with our offensive line, WRs, etc.
I kinda agree, especially when you see what happened to Jackson Kollack. Pretty much a year prior he was a highly regarded recruit with multiple options. One year on the bench and he might not have a good offer to play somewhere.
While I appreciate any respect our team gets, the bolded makes me think the author isn't paying much attention to us. I think it's obvious our right side of the offensive line, WRs, and maybe DTs/CBs are the positions we'd need elite play from, not QB.