More so Kill played Amaefula right away because they needed the depth on the DL and wanted to RS Cockran not that he had the strength. Kill didn't want to waste a RS year on freshman he thinks will help further down the road instead of playing them during a wasted season. He really wanted to RS Tommy Olson but couldn't due to injuries that is why Tommy didn't play the first 3 or 4 games, but clearly he was our best lineman.
That's why he RS guys like Cobb, Westerhaus, Matilus ect... Kill had just enough depth to avoid playing these guys, but from what I have heard he really wanted too.
A little Birdie tells me that Cobb is in line to get a bunch of carries next year, he might even be the 1RB but more than likely the 2. You can bank on it!
Huh?
Tommy Olson played the first game of the season. They may have wanted to RS Tommy in an ideal world, but there were never any plans to redshirt him. He played (mostly special teams), in the first game of the season.
Why? Because he was more ready to play right away than our other FR OL (Bush, McAvoy, McAvoy, Bjorklund).
If your theory that we burn the RS on players who we expect less from down the road, you are arguing that the U liked Tommy Olson less than Bush, McAvoy, McAvoy, and Bjorklund. It doesn't make sense.
More importantly, Tommy Olson played in the very first game of the season.
Cobb didn't RS. He played this season as late as the Iowa game, so he did not RS. Your little birdy might have simply been common sense. Cobb will get a lot of carries next year. Whoever #1 is going to be depends largely on how good Gillum is, and then who wins out between Cobb and Kirkwood. No little birdy is needed to come to that conclusion.
Matilus: I think he redshirted because he played a position where we had/have relative depth. They'd prefer to RS everyone, if they can, they will.